Communities of shared interests and cognitive bridges: the case of the anti-vaccination movement on Twitter
暂无分享,去创建一个
Rodrigo Costas | Jonathan Dudek | Francois van Schalkwyk | R. Costas | François B. Van Schalkwyk | J. Dudek
[1] M. M. Kessler. Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers , 1963 .
[2] M. Castells. The rise of the network society , 1996 .
[3] P. Geurts,et al. Forces and functions in scientific communication: an analysis of their interplay , 1997 .
[4] Blaise Cronin,et al. Invoked on the Web , 1998, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[5] David Harel,et al. A Fast Multi-scale Method for Drawing Large Graphs , 2000, Graph Drawing.
[6] Peter R. Monge,et al. Theories of Communication Networks , 2003 .
[7] R. M. Wolfe,et al. Vaccine Criticism on the World Wide Web , 2005, Journal of medical Internet research.
[8] Sheila Jasanoff,et al. Transparency in Public Science: Purposes, Reasons, Limits , 2006 .
[9] Felix Stalder,et al. Manuel Castells: The Theory of the Network Society , 2006 .
[10] Dangzhi Zhao,et al. Evolution of research activities and intellectual influences in information science 1996–2005: Introducing author bibliographic-coupling analysis , 2008 .
[11] Andreas Strotmann,et al. Evolution of research activities and intellectual influences in information science 1996-2005: Introducing author bibliographic-coupling analysis , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[12] M. Castells. Communication Power: Mass Communication, Mass Self-Communication and Power Relationships in the Network Society , 2009, Media and Society.
[13] Ben Shneiderman,et al. Analyzing Social Media Networks with NodeXL: Insights from a Connected World , 2010 .
[14] S. J. Bean. Emerging and continuing trends in vaccine opposition website content. , 2011, Vaccine.
[15] P. Weingart. Science, the Public and the Media – Views from Everywhere , 2011 .
[16] M. Castells. ”Networks of Outrage and Hope. Social Movements in the Internet Age”. , 2019 .
[17] A. Kata. Anti-vaccine activists, Web 2.0, and the postmodern paradigm--an overview of tactics and tropes used online by the anti-vaccination movement. , 2012, Vaccine.
[18] P. Gerbaudo. Tweets and the Streets: Social Media and Contemporary Activism , 2012 .
[19] Tommaso Venturini,et al. Building on faults: How to represent controversies with digital methods , 2012, Public understanding of science.
[20] Shalin Hai-Jew. Analyzing Social Media Networks with NodeXL: Insights from a Connected World , 2012 .
[21] Mike Thelwall,et al. Tweeting Links to Academic Articles , 2013 .
[22] J. V. van Dijck,et al. Understanding Social Media Logic , 2013 .
[23] Dan M. Kahan,et al. A Risky Science Communication Environment for Vaccines , 2013, Science.
[24] Pablo Barberá. How Social Media Reduces Mass Political Polarization. Evidence from Germany, Spain, and the U.S. , 2014 .
[25] Cornelius Puschmann,et al. (Micro)Blogging Science? Notes on Potentials and Constraints of New Forms of Scholarly Communication , 2014 .
[26] Dietram A. Scheufele,et al. Science communication as political communication , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[27] Vincent Larivière,et al. Astrophysicists on Twitter: An in-depth analysis of tweeting and scientific publication behavior , 2014, Aslib J. Inf. Manag..
[28] Éric Archambault,et al. Proportion of Open Access Papers Published in Peer-Reviewed Journals at the European and World Levels—1996-2013 , 2014 .
[29] D. Kahan. Vaccine Risk Perceptions and Ad Hoc Risk Communication: An Empirical Assessment , 2014 .
[30] Richard Rogers,et al. Digital Methods for Web Research , 2015 .
[31] Rodrigo Costas,et al. Interpreting "altmetrics": viewing acts on social media through the lens of citation and social theories , 2015, ArXiv.
[32] S. Haustein,et al. Characterizing Social Media Metrics of Scholarly Papers: The Effect of Document Properties and Collaboration Patterns , 2015, PloS one.
[33] Dietram A. Scheufele,et al. Selecting Our Own Science , 2015 .
[34] Ali Ghazinejad,et al. Who Tweets about Science? , 2015, ISSI.
[35] S. Leonelli,et al. Sticks and carrots: encouraging open science at its source , 2015, Geo : geography and environment.
[36] Daniel Spichtinger,et al. Sticksandcarrots: encouraging open science at its source: Encouraging open science at its source , 2015 .
[37] Winni Johansen,et al. Organizations, Stakeholders, and Intermediaries: Towards a General Theory , 2015 .
[38] Rodrigo Costas. Identifying Twitter audiences: who is tweeting about scientific papers? , 2015 .
[39] J. Leask. Should we do battle with antivaccination activists? , 2015, Public health research & practice.
[40] David Gunnarsson Lorentzen,et al. Twitter conversation patterns related to research papers , 2016, Inf. Res..
[41] Yang Feng. Are you connected? Evaluating information cascades in online discussion about the #RaceTogether campaign , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..
[42] Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al. Using Altmetrics for Contextualised Mapping of Societal Impact: From Hits to Networks , 2016 .
[43] Bernd Blöbaum. Key Factors in the Process of Trust. On the Analysis of Trust under Digital Conditions , 2016 .
[44] Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al. SSH & the City. A Network Approach for Tracing the Societal Contribution of the Social Sciences and Humanities for Local Development , 2016, ArXiv.
[45] M. Moran,et al. What makes anti-vaccine websites persuasive? A content analysis of techniques used by anti-vaccine websites to engender anti-vaccine sentiment , 2016 .
[46] C. Rodrigo. Discussing practical applications for altmetrics: social media profiles for African, European and North American publications , 2016 .
[47] Stefanie Haustein,et al. Grand challenges in altmetrics: heterogeneity, data quality and dependencies , 2016, Scientometrics.
[48] Tim Wu. The Attention Merchants: The Epic Scramble to Get Inside Our Heads , 2016 .
[49] Scott Counts,et al. Understanding Anti-Vaccination Attitudes in Social Media , 2016, ICWSM.
[50] Lars Guenther,et al. Science communication and the issue of trust , 2016 .
[51] Iain G. Johnston,et al. The State of Vaccine Confidence 2016: Global Insights Through a 67-Country Survey , 2016, EBioMedicine.
[52] Gianluca Stringhini,et al. The web centipede: understanding how web communities influence each other through the lens of mainstream and alternative news sources , 2017, Internet Measurement Conference.
[53] Rodrigo Costas,et al. The unbearable emptiness of tweeting—About journal articles , 2017, PloS one.
[54] R. Costas,et al. Beyond the dependencies of altmetrics : conceptualizing ‘ heterogeneous couplings ’ between social media and science , 2017 .
[55] Kim Holmberg,et al. Highly tweeted science articles: who tweets them? An analysis of Twitter user profile descriptions , 2017, Scientometrics.
[56] M. Wacha,et al. The State of OA: A large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles , 2017 .
[57] Brian G. Southwell,et al. Promoting Popular Understanding of Science and Health Through Social Networks , 2017 .
[58] P. Hotez,et al. Public Health and Economic Consequences of Vaccine Hesitancy for Measles in the United States , 2017, JAMA pediatrics.
[59] Davide Bennato. The shift from public science communication to public relations. The Vaxxed case , 2017 .
[60] Mike S. Schäfer. How Changing Media Structures Are Affecting Science News Coverage , 2017 .
[61] Vincent Miller. Phatic culture and the status quo , 2017 .
[62] #Vaccination: Identifying Influencers in the Vaccination Discussion on Twitter through Social Network Visualisation , 2017 .
[63] M. Bucchi. Credibility, expertise and the challenges of science communication 2.0 , 2017, Public understanding of science.
[64] N. Robinson-García,et al. Using Altmetrics for Contextualised Mapping of Societal Impact: From Hits to Networks , 2017 .
[65] Ben Shneiderman,et al. Classifying Twitter Topic-Networks Using Social Network Analysis , 2017 .
[66] Vincent Larivière,et al. Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature , 2016, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[67] M. Moten,et al. Measles: is it still a threat? , 2018, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.
[68] M. Thelwall,et al. Academic information on Twitter: A user survey , 2018, PloS one.
[69] Joshua A. Tucker,et al. Social Media, Political Polarization, and Political Disinformation: A Review of the Scientific Literature , 2018 .
[70] Castells in Africa: Universities and Development , 2018 .
[71] Jure Leskovec,et al. Community Interaction and Conflict on the Web , 2018, WWW.
[72] Fereshteh Didegah,et al. Investigating the quality of interactions and public engagement around scientific papers on Twitter , 2018, J. Informetrics.
[73] Rodrigo Costas,et al. General discussion of data quality challenges in social media metrics: Extensive comparison of four major altmetric data aggregators , 2018, PloS one.
[74] James Williams. Stand Out of Our Light : Freedom and Resistance in the Attention Economy , 2018 .
[75] Grant Blank,et al. The echo chamber is overstated: the moderating effect of political interest and diverse media , 2018 .
[76] Ubaldo Cuesta-Cambra,et al. An analysis of pro-vaccine and anti-vaccine information on social networks and the internet: Visual and emotional patterns , 2019, El Profesional de la Información.
[77] Adrián A. Díaz-Faes,et al. Towards a second generation of ‘social media metrics’: Characterizing Twitter communities of attention around science , 2019, PloS one.
[78] Van Schalkwyk,et al. New potentials in the communication of open science with non‐scientific publics: The case of the anti‐vaccination movement , 2019 .
[79] Stefanie Haustein,et al. How much research shared on Facebook is hidden from public view? A comparison of public and private online activity around PLOS ONE papers , 2019, ArXiv.
[80] A. Crooks,et al. Examining Emergent Communities and Social Bots Within the Polarized Online Vaccination Debate in Twitter , 2019, Social Media + Society.
[81] Juan Pablo Alperin,et al. How much research shared on Facebook happens outside of public pages and groups? A comparison of public and private online activity around PLOS ONE papers , 2019, Quantitative Science Studies.
[82] Jin-Cheon Na,et al. A comparative analysis of Twitter users who Tweeted on psychology and political science journal articles , 2019, Online Inf. Rev..
[83] Mike Thelwall,et al. Who shares health and medical scholarly articles on Facebook? , 2020, Learn. Publ..