The Icarus paradox revisited: how strong performance sows the seeds of dysfunction in future strategic decision-making

This article reports on two studies that examine the relationship between performance and strategic issue-framing and decision-processing.The results suggest strong performance promotes a defensive mindset that may lead to dysfunctional outcomes. Study 1 draws its data from 51 CEOs and shows that performance is associated with framing issues as threats rather than opportunities. Study 2 draws its data from 45 top management teams and shows that performance is associated with less comprehensiveness in decision-making. Implications of these findings provide insights into why organizations that perform well sometimes squander their success subsequently through poor decision-making.

[1]  Kyung Min Park.  Antecedents of Convergence and Divergence in Strategic Positioning: The Effects of Performance and Aspiration on the Direction of Strategic Change , 2007 .

[2]  Pino G. Audia,et al.  Reluctant to change: Self-enhancing responses to diverging performance measures , 2007, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes.

[3]  Jeffrey Q. Barden,et al.  Cognitive Underpinnings of Institutional Persistence and Change: A Framing Perspective , 2006 .

[4]  Daniel P. Forbes.  Managerial determinants of decision speed in new ventures , 2005 .

[5]  K. Atuahene–Gima,et al.  Strategic Decision Comprehensiveness and New Product Development Outcomes in New Technology Ventures , 2004 .

[6]  H. Greve.  A Behavioral Theory of R&D Expenditures and Innovations: Evidence from Shipbuilding , 2003 .

[7]  J. Baum,et al.  STRATEGIC DECISION SPEED AND FIRM PERFORMANCE , 2003 .

[8]  B. Hamilton,et al.  Correcting for Endogeneity in Strategic Management Research , 2003 .

[9]  Gerardo A. Okhuysen,et al.  The Speed Trap: Exploring the Relationship Between Decision Making and Temporal Context , 2002 .

[10]  G. Huber,et al.  Organizational Actions in Response to Threats and Opportunities , 2001 .

[11]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  The Paradox of Success: An Archival and a Laboratory Study of Strategic Persistence Following Radical Environmental Change , 2000 .

[12]  Ronald K. Mitchell,et al.  Who Matters to Ceos? An Investigation of Stakeholder Attributes and Salience, Corpate Performance, and Ceo Values , 1999 .

[13]  Richard P. Larrick,et al.  Goals as Reference Points , 1999, Cognitive Psychology.

[14]  William T. Ross,et al.  The Impact of Positive and Negative Affect and Issue Framing on Issue Interpretation and Risk Taking , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[15]  C. Carver,et al.  On the Self-Regulation of Behavior , 1998 .

[16]  C. Carver,et al.  On the Self-Regulation of Behavior , 1998 .

[17]  H. Greve.  Performance, Aspirations, and Risky Organizational Change , 1998 .

[18]  Mark P. Sharfman,et al.  Flexibility in Strategic Decision Making: Informational and Ideological Perspectives , 1997 .

[19]  Joseph L. C. Cheng,et al.  Organizational Slack and Response to Environmental Shifts: The Impact of Resource Allocation Patterns , 1997 .

[20]  D. Schendel,et al.  STRATEGIC REFERENCE POINT THEORY , 1996 .

[21]  Allen C. Amason.  Distinguishing the Effects of Functional and Dysfunctional Conflict on Strategic Decision Making: Resolving a Paradox for Top Management Teams , 1996 .

[22]  Kent D. Miller,et al.  Corporate Risk-Return Relations: Returns Variability Versus Downside Risk , 1996 .

[23]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  Efficacy-Performing Spirals: A Multilevel Perspective , 1995 .

[24]  Elazar J. Pedhazur,et al.  Measurement, Design, and Analysis: An Integrated Approach , 1994 .

[25]  Phyllis C. Panzano,et al.  THE INFLUENCE OF ISSUE FRAME AND ORGANIZATIONAL SLACK ON RISKY DECISION MAKING: A FIELD STUDY. , 1994 .

[26]  D. Hambrick,et al.  TOP EXECUTIVE COMMITMENT TO THE STATUS QUO: SOME TESTS OF ITS DETERMINANTS , 1993 .

[27]  Glen Whyte,et al.  Escalating Commitment in Individual and Group Decision Making: A Prospect Theory Approach , 1993 .

[28]  Deepak K. Datta,et al.  Strategic Decision Processes: Critical Review and Future Directions , 1993 .

[29]  Theresa K. Lant,et al.  Aspiration Level Adaptation: An Empirical Exploration , 1992 .

[30]  O. Douglas Moses,et al.  Organizational slack and risk-taking behaviour: tests of product pricing strategy , 1992 .

[31]  W Q Judge,et al.  Antecedents and Outcomes of Decision Speed in Different Environmental Contexts , 1991, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[32]  P. Bromiley.  Testing a Causal Model of Corporate Risk Taking and Performance , 1991 .

[33]  James B. Thomas,et al.  Interpreting Strategic Issues: Effects of Strategy and the Information-Processing Structure of Top Management Teams , 1990 .

[34]  James W. Fredrickson,et al.  Inertia And Creeping Rationality In Strategic Decision Processes , 1989 .

[35]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Making Fast Strategic Decisions In High-Velocity Environments , 1989 .

[36]  Ari Ginsberg,et al.  Measuring and modelling changes in strategy: Theoretical foundations and empirical directions , 1988 .

[37]  Mark P. Sharfman,et al.  Antecedents of Organizational Slack , 1988 .

[38]  J. Dutton,et al.  Discerning threats and opportunities. , 1988 .

[39]  Frances J. Milliken,et al.  Challenger: Fine-Tuning the Odds Until Something Breaks , 1988 .

[40]  David C. Wilson,et al.  Top Decisions: Strategic Decision-Making in Organizations. , 1987 .

[41]  David John Hickson,et al.  Top decisions : strategic decision-making in organizations , 1987 .

[42]  Gregory G. Dess.  Consensus on strategy formulation and organizational performance: Competitors in a fragmented industry , 1987 .

[43]  S Ferguson,et al.  Regression toward the mean? , 1987, Archives of neurology.

[44]  J. Dutton,et al.  THE CREATION OF MOMENTUM FOR CHANGE THROUGH THE PROCESS OF STRATEGIC ISSUE DIAGNOSIS , 1987 .

[45]  Sanford B. Ehrlich,et al.  The Romance of Leadership and The Evaluation of Organizational Performance , 1987 .

[46]  D. Isenberg.  Thinking and Managing: A Verbal Protocol Analysis of Managerial Problem Solving , 1986 .

[47]  Jitendra V. Singh.  Performance, Slack, and Risk Taking in Organizational Decision Making , 1986 .

[48]  T. Mitchell,et al.  Strategic Decision Processes: Comprehensiveness and Performance in an Industry with an Unstable Environment , 1984 .

[49]  R. Daft,et al.  Toward a Model of Organizations as Interpretation Systems , 1984 .

[50]  A. Tversky,et al.  Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: the conjunction fallacy in probability judgment , 1983 .

[51]  Liam Fahey,et al.  Toward understanding strategic issue diagnosis , 1983 .

[52]  L. J. Bourgeois,et al.  Organizational Slack and Political Behavior Among Top Management Teams. , 1983 .

[53]  K. Marino,et al.  Measuring Organizational Slack: A Note on the Convergence and Divergence of Alternative Operational Definitions , 1983 .

[54]  W. Powell,et al.  THE IRON CAGE REVISITED: , 1983, The New Economic Sociology.

[55]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  Threat-rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis. , 1981 .

[56]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  The Structure of "Unstructured" Decision Processes , 1976 .

[57]  P. Nystrom,et al.  Camping on Seesaws: Prescriptions for a Self-Designing Organization , 1976 .

[58]  E. Rosch,et al.  Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[59]  E. Rosch.  Cognitive reference points , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[60]  Graham Allison,et al.  Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis , 1972 .

[61]  M. Shubik,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. , 1964 .

[62]  L. Cronbach.  Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .

[63]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk — Source link , 2007 .

[64]  R. Gulati.  Is Slack Good or Bad for Innovation ? , 2007 .

[65]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  Efficacy-performance spirals: A multilevel perspective. , 1995 .

[66]  G. A. Baker,et al.  EFFECTS OF DECISION MOTIVE AND ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE LEVEL ON STRATEGIC DECISION PROCESSES , 1992 .

[67]  Danny Miller,et al.  The Icarus Paradox: How Exceptional Companies Bring About Their Own Downfall , 1990 .

[68]  D. Norburn,et al.  The chief executive: A breed apart , 1989 .

[69]  T. S. Bateman,et al.  The psychological context of strategic decisions: A model and convergent experimental findings , 1989 .

[70]  J. Dutton,et al.  Categorizing Strategic Issues: Links to Organizational Action , 1987 .

[71]  Liam Fahey,et al.  The Micro-Politics of Strategy Formulation1 , 1982 .

[72]  I. Janis.  Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes , 1982 .

[73]  L. Bourgeois.  On the Measurement of Organizational Slack , 1981 .

[74]  E. Rosch,et al.  Categorization of Natural Objects , 1981 .

[75]  J. Heckman.  Sample selection bias as a specification error , 1979 .