Super-resolution in medical imaging : An illustrative approach through ultrasound

The requirements for better resolution in all medical imaging modalities currently represent a very important and open challenge. Accurate measurement and visualization of structure in living tissues is intrinsically limited by the imaging system features. Imaging beyond these limits in medical imaging is referred to as super-resolution. We provide first a brief overview of super-resolution imaging and present a technique for achieving super-resolution in medical imaging based on analysis of the imaging system point spread function, and illustrate the methodology in the case of ultrasound imaging. The technique proposed uses parametric modeling to estimate B-mode images. The technique behavior is illustrated using phantom and in vivo images.

[1]  R. Jirik,et al.  High-resolution ultrasonic imaging using two-dimensional homomorphic filtering , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[2]  John William Strutt,et al.  On the Manufacture and Theory of Diffraction-Gratings , 2009 .

[3]  Michael J. Welch,et al.  MicroPET imaging with non-conventional isotopes , 2001 .

[4]  A.J. den Dekker Model-based optical resolution , 1996, Quality Measurement: The Indispensable Bridge between Theory and Reality (No Measurements? No Science! Joint Conference - 1996: IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference and IMEKO Tec.

[5]  Moon Gi Kang,et al.  Super-resolution image reconstruction: a technical overview , 2003, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[6]  P. Vaska,et al.  An MR compatible PET scanner based on RatCAP for small animal imaging at 9.4 T , 2008, 2008 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[7]  Peyman Milanfar,et al.  Statistical and Information-Theoretic Analysis of Resolution in Imaging , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[8]  Russell C. Hardie,et al.  A Fast Image Super-Resolution Algorithm Using an Adaptive Wiener Filter , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[9]  Denis Kouame,et al.  Multidimensional Complex Number Parametric Model Order and Parameters Estimation , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing Proceedings.

[10]  Peyman Milanfar,et al.  Imaging below the diffraction limit: a statistical analysis , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[11]  Steven Kay,et al.  Modern Spectral Estimation: Theory and Application , 1988 .

[12]  Piero Tortoli,et al.  Introduction to the Special Issue on Novel Equipment for Ultrasound Research , 2006 .

[13]  L.R. Furenlid,et al.  A new PET system for small-animal imaging , 2004, IEEE Symposium Conference Record Nuclear Science 2004..

[14]  Gregory T. Clement,et al.  Superresolution ultrasound imaging using back-projected reconstruction. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  Hongkai Zhao,et al.  Super-resolution in time-reversal acoustics. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  Jan Sijbers,et al.  Model-based two-object resolution from observations having counting statistics , 1999 .

[17]  Takeo Kanade,et al.  Limits on super-resolution and how to break them , 2000, Proceedings IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2000 (Cat. No.PR00662).

[18]  A. van den Bos,et al.  Ultimate resolution: a mathematical framework , 1991 .

[19]  D. A. Christopher,et al.  Advances in ultrasound biomicroscopy. , 2000, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[20]  J.Th.M. De Hosson,et al.  Superlattice dislocations in the L12 ordered structure of Cu2NiZn , 1983 .