Epidemiologic research and Web 2.0--the user-driven Web.

The basic information technology for epidemiologic surveillance was once (and often still is) “shoe-leather”—a term that harkens back to the days of John Snow and his predecessors, when data collection was limited by how far an epidemiologist could walk. Since then, the technological tools for data collection have evolved. The gradual adoption of the telephone in the late 19th and early 20th centuries facilitated the use of phones for surveillance purposes. By the 1950s, public health officials were using telephone interviews to conduct outbreak investigations and, in doing so, helped to usher in a new era in survey methodology. Likewise, the advent of the computer age profoundly altered the landscape of population-health research. In the last 30 years, electronic medical records, health insurance claims data, and population-based registers have allowed investigators to conduct research on large samples, and usage of computer data repositories has become accepted practice. More recently, epidemiologists have taken advantage of the Internet as a communications medium to facilitate research. The world is increasingly “wired”: over 1.8 billion persons worldwide use the Internet, and population percentages of Internet users are high for many developed regions. Accordingly, many aspects of research, including recruitment, data collection, and even certain interventions have been implemented through the Internet. But the value of the Internet for epidemiologic research is not simply as a faster method of reaching potential participants or conducting a survey, or as a replacement for the telephone when people are increasingly reluctant to respond to solicitations. Userdriven Internet content—particularly the content produced under the Web 2.0 platform— offers research opportunities for epidemiology that have only begun to be explored.

[1]  Philip J Troped,et al.  Portable global positioning units to complement accelerometry-based physical activity monitors. , 2005, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[2]  J. Brownstein,et al.  Early detection of disease outbreaks using the Internet , 2009, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[3]  B. Motheral,et al.  The use of claims databases for outcomes research: rationale, challenges, and strategies. , 1997, Clinical therapeutics.

[4]  B. Breyer,et al.  Use of Google in study of noninfectious medical conditions. , 2010, Epidemiology.

[5]  A. Flahault,et al.  More Diseases Tracked by Using Google Trends , 2009, Emerging infectious diseases.

[6]  Iris Pigeot,et al.  Handbook of epidemiology , 2005 .

[7]  H. Morgenstern,et al.  Ecologic studies in epidemiology: concepts, principles, and methods. , 1995, Annual review of public health.

[8]  S. Goodreau,et al.  Effect of an Online Video-Based Intervention to Increase HIV Testing in Men Who Have Sex with Men in Peru , 2010, PloS one.

[9]  Amanda Williams,et al.  A review of online social networking profiles by adolescents: implications for future research and intervention. , 2008, Adolescence.

[10]  J. Klausner,et al.  Tracing a syphilis outbreak through cyberspace. , 2000, JAMA.

[11]  Kei-Hoi Cheung,et al.  Case Report: Development of Grid-like Applications for Public Health Using Web 2.0 Mashup Techniques , 2008, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[12]  G. Laveck,et al.  Staphylococcal disease; an obstetric, pediatric, and community problem. , 1956, American Journal of Public Health and the Nations Health.

[14]  Douglas D. Heckathorn,et al.  Respondent-driven sampling II: deriving valid population estimates from chain-referral samples of hi , 2002 .

[15]  Crystale Purvis Cooper,et al.  Cancer Internet Search Activity on a Major Search Engine, United States 2001-2003 , 2005, Journal of medical Internet research.

[16]  Hossein N Yarandi,et al.  The Digital Divide and Urban Older Adults , 2010, Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN.

[17]  R. Ravenholt,et al.  The telephone in epidemiology of staphylococcal disease. , 1961, The American journal of nursing.

[18]  Jan-Eric Litton,et al.  An Internet-Based Hearing Test for Simple Audiometry in Nonclinical Settings: Preliminary Validation and Proof of Principle , 2010, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[19]  D. Borzekowski,et al.  e-Ana and e-Mia: A content analysis of pro-eating disorder Web sites. , 2010, American journal of public health.

[20]  Danielle E. Ramo,et al.  Reaching young adult smokers through the internet: comparison of three recruitment mechanisms. , 2010, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[21]  David Osimo Web 2.0 in Government: Why and How? , 2008 .

[22]  J. Brownstein,et al.  Digital disease detection--harnessing the Web for public health surveillance. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  M. Rosén,et al.  Use of disease registers , 2005 .

[24]  G. Eysenbach Infodemiology and Infoveillance: Framework for an Emerging Set of Public Health Informatics Methods to Analyze Search, Communication and Publication Behavior on the Internet , 2009, Journal of medical Internet research.

[25]  Thomas W Scott,et al.  Usefulness of commercially available GPS data-loggers for tracking human movement and exposure to dengue virus , 2009 .

[26]  Paul Wicks,et al.  The power of social networking in medicine , 2009, Nature Biotechnology.

[27]  Jeremy Ginsberg,et al.  Detecting influenza epidemics using search engine query data , 2009, Nature.

[28]  Daniel Westreich,et al.  Propensity score estimation: neural networks, support vector machines, decision trees (CART), and meta-classifiers as alternatives to logistic regression. , 2010, Journal of clinical epidemiology.