The Hippocampus Supports Both Recollection and Familiarity When Memories Are Strong

Recognition memory is thought to consist of two component processes—recollection and familiarity. It has been suggested that the hippocampus supports recollection, while adjacent cortex supports familiarity. However, the qualitative experiences of recollection and familiarity are typically confounded with a quantitative difference in memory strength (recollection > familiarity). Thus, the question remains whether the hippocampus might in fact support familiarity-based memories whenever they are as strong as recollection-based memories. We addressed this problem in a novel way by using the Remember/Know procedure, which allowed us to explicitly match the confidence and accuracy of Remember and Know decisions. As in earlier studies, recollected items had higher accuracy and confidence than familiar items, and hippocampal activity was higher for recollected items than for familiar items. Furthermore, hippocampal activity was similar for familiar items, misses, and correct rejections. When the accuracy and confidence of recollected and familiar items were matched, the findings were dramatically different. Hippocampal activity was now similar for recollected and familiar items. Importantly, hippocampal activity was also greater for familiar items than for misses or correct rejections (as well as for recollected items vs misses or correct rejections). Our findings suggest that the hippocampus supports both recollection and familiarity when memories are strong.

[1]  John T Wixted,et al.  A demonstration that the hippocampus supports both recollection and familiarity , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  R. Insausti,et al.  Human medial temporal lobe in aging: Anatomical basis of memory preservation , 1998, Microscopy research and technique.

[3]  Daniel L Schacter,et al.  Amygdala Activity Is Associated with the Successful Encoding of Item, But Not Source, Information for Positive and Negative Stimuli , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  Craig K. Jones,et al.  High‐resolution fMRI investigation of the medial temporal lobe , 2007, Human brain mapping.

[5]  L R Squire,et al.  When amnesic patients perform well on recognition memory tests. , 1997, Behavioral neuroscience.

[6]  Brian B. Avants,et al.  A high-resolution computational atlas of the human hippocampus from postmortem magnetic resonance imaging at 9.4 T , 2009, NeuroImage.

[7]  John T Wixted,et al.  Recollection can be weak and familiarity can be strong. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[8]  J. Wixted,et al.  A continuous dual-process model of remember/know judgments. , 2010, Psychological review.

[9]  Arthur P. Shimamura,et al.  Source memory impairment in patients with frontal lobe lesions , 1989, Neuropsychologia.

[10]  J. Dunn Remember-know: a matter of confidence. , 2004, Psychological review.

[11]  E. Tulving,et al.  Frontal lobe damage produces episodic memory impairment , 1995, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[12]  L. Otten,et al.  Fragments of a larger whole: retrieval cues constrain observed neural correlates of memory encoding. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[13]  Shauna M. Stark,et al.  Distinct pattern separation related transfer functions in human CA3/dentate and CA1 revealed using high-resolution fMRI and variable mnemonic similarity. , 2010, Learning & memory.

[14]  H. Soininen,et al.  MR volumetric analysis of the human entorhinal, perirhinal, and temporopolar cortices. , 1998, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[15]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Improved Assessment of Significant Activation in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI): Use of a Cluster‐Size Threshold , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[16]  B. Knowlton,et al.  A Dissociation of Encoding and Retrieval Processes in the Human Hippocampus , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  Zhuang Song,et al.  Different nonlinear functions in hippocampus and perirhinal cortex relating functional MRI activity to memory strength , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  B. Knowlton,et al.  Remembering episodes: a selective role for the hippocampus during retrieval , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[19]  Scott D. Slotnick,et al.  Support for a continuous (single-process) model of recognition memory and source memory , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[20]  John T. Wixted,et al.  Remember/Know Judgments Probe Degrees of Recollection , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[21]  John T Wixted,et al.  Activity in the Medial Temporal Lobe Predicts Memory Strength, Whereas Activity in the Prefrontal Cortex Predicts Recollection , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  Michael A Yassa,et al.  A quantitative evaluation of cross-participant registration techniques for MRI studies of the medial temporal lobe , 2009, NeuroImage.

[23]  R. Clark,et al.  Recognition memory and the medial temporal lobe: a new perspective , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[24]  Michael Wilson,et al.  MRC psycholinguistic database: Machine-usable dictionary, version 2.00 , 1988 .

[25]  Myra A. Fernandes,et al.  Neural correlates of recollection and familiarity: A review of neuroimaging and patient data , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[26]  Craig E. L. Stark,et al.  High-resolution structural and functional MRI of hippocampal CA3 and dentate gyrus in patients with amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment , 2010, NeuroImage.

[27]  Daniela Montaldi,et al.  The role of recollection and familiarity in the functional differentiation of the medial temporal lobes , 2010, Hippocampus.

[28]  L. Squire,et al.  The medial temporal lobe and the attributes of memory , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[29]  Larry R. Squire,et al.  In Search of Recollection and Familiarity Signals in the Hippocampus , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[30]  Can Ceritoglu,et al.  Increasing the power of functional maps of the medial temporal lobe by using large deformation diffeomorphic metric mapping. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  Arno Klein,et al.  Evaluation of 14 nonlinear deformation algorithms applied to human brain MRI registration , 2009, NeuroImage.

[32]  Richard C. Atkinson,et al.  Search and decision processes in recognition memory. , 1974 .

[33]  Rachel A. Diana,et al.  Imaging recollection and familiarity in the medial temporal lobe: a three-component model , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[34]  Pierre Maquet,et al.  Brain activity underlying encoding and retrieval of source memory. , 2002, Cerebral cortex.

[35]  Ramona O Hopkins,et al.  Item memory, source memory, and the medial temporal lobe: concordant findings from fMRI and memory-impaired patients. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  Malcolm W. Brown,et al.  Recognition memory: What are the roles of the perirhinal cortex and hippocampus? , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[37]  P. Suppes,et al.  Contemporary Developments in Mathematical Psychology , 1976 .

[38]  R W Cox,et al.  AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. , 1996, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[39]  R. Cabeza,et al.  Triple dissociation in the medial temporal lobes: recollection, familiarity, and novelty. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[40]  D. Montaldi,et al.  The neural system that mediates familiarity memory , 2006, Hippocampus.

[41]  John T Wixted,et al.  In defense of the signal detection interpretation of remember/know judgments , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[42]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Source monitoring 15 years later: what have we learned from fMRI about the neural mechanisms of source memory? , 2009, Psychological bulletin.

[43]  J. Dunn The dimensionality of the remember-know task: a state-trace analysis. , 2008, Psychological review.

[44]  Morris Moscovitch,et al.  Recollection versus strength as the primary determinant of hippocampal engagement at retrieval , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[45]  M. Rugg,et al.  Separating the Brain Regions Involved in Recollection and Familiarity in Recognition Memory , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[46]  John T Wixted,et al.  Measuring recollection and familiarity in the medial temporal lobe , 2010, Hippocampus.

[47]  H. Eichenbaum,et al.  The medial temporal lobe and recognition memory. , 2007, Annual review of neuroscience.

[48]  G. Mandler Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. , 1980 .

[49]  Jason P. Mitchell,et al.  Multiple routes to memory: Distinct medial temporal lobe processes build item and source memories , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[50]  S Rajaram,et al.  Perceptual effects on remembering: recollective processes in picture recognition memory. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[51]  D. Amaral,et al.  Entorhinal cortex of the monkey: IV. Topographical and laminar organization of cortical afferents , 2008, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[52]  Michael D. Rugg,et al.  Dissociation of the neural correlates of recognition memory according to familiarity, recollection, and amount of recollected information , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[53]  John T Wixted,et al.  A direct test of the unequal-variance signal detection model of recognition memory , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[54]  M. Torrens Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain—3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging, J. Talairach, P. Tournoux. Georg Thieme Verlag, New York (1988), 122 pp., 130 figs. DM 268 , 1990 .

[55]  M Moscovitch,et al.  Frontal Lobes, Memory, and Aging , 1995, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[56]  Jack L. Lancaster,et al.  Clustered pixels analysis for functional MRI activation studies of the human brain , 1995 .

[57]  Caren M Rotello,et al.  Analysis of RT distributions in the remember—know paradigm , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[58]  Craig E. L. Stark,et al.  When zero is not zero: The problem of ambiguous baseline conditions in fMRI , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.