Mechanistic site-based emulation of a global ocean biogeochemical model (MEDUSA 1.0) for parametric analysis and calibration: an application of the Marine Model Optimization Testbed (MarMOT 1.1)

Abstract. Biogeochemical ocean circulation models used to investigate the role of plankton ecosystems in global change rely on adjustable parameters to capture the dominant biogeochemical dynamics of a complex biological system. In principle, optimal parameter values can be estimated by fitting models to observational data, including satellite ocean colour products such as chlorophyll that achieve good spatial and temporal coverage of the surface ocean. However, comprehensive parametric analyses require large ensemble experiments that are computationally infeasible with global 3-D simulations. Site-based simulations provide an efficient alternative but can only be used to make reliable inferences about global model performance if robust quantitative descriptions of their relationships with the corresponding 3-D simulations can be established. The feasibility of establishing such a relationship is investigated for an intermediate complexity biogeochemistry model (MEDUSA) coupled with a widely used global ocean model (NEMO). A site-based mechanistic emulator is constructed for surface chlorophyll output from this target model as a function of model parameters. The emulator comprises an array of 1-D simulators and a statistical quantification of the uncertainty in their predictions. The unknown parameter-dependent biogeochemical environment, in terms of initial tracer concentrations and lateral flux information required by the simulators, is a significant source of uncertainty. It is approximated by a mean environment derived from a small ensemble of 3-D simulations representing variability of the target model behaviour over the parameter space of interest. The performance of two alternative uncertainty quantification schemes is examined: a direct method based on comparisons between simulator output and a sample of known target model "truths" and an indirect method that is only partially reliant on knowledge of the target model output. In general, chlorophyll records at a representative array of oceanic sites are well reproduced. The use of lateral flux information reduces the 1-D simulator error considerably, consistent with a major influence of advection at some sites. Emulator robustness is assessed by comparing actual error distributions with those predicted. With the direct uncertainty quantification scheme, the emulator is reasonably robust over all sites. The indirect uncertainty quantification scheme is less reliable at some sites but scope for improving its performance is identified. The results demonstrate the strong potential of the emulation approach to improve the effectiveness of site-based methods. This represents important progress towards establishing a robust site-based capability that will allow comprehensive parametric analyses to be achieved for improving global models and quantifying uncertainty in their predictions.

[1]  Watson W. Gregg,et al.  Phytoplankton and iron: validation of a global three-dimensional ocean biogeochemical model , 2003 .

[2]  Richard J. Beckman,et al.  A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output From a Computer Code , 2000, Technometrics.

[3]  Andreas Oschlies,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of simple global marine biogeochemical models , 2012 .

[4]  Richard J. Matear,et al.  Parameter optimization and analysis of ecosystem models using simulated annealing: a case study at Station P , 1995 .

[5]  R. Giering,et al.  Two decades of terrestrial carbon fluxes from a carbon cycle data assimilation system (CCDAS) , 2005 .

[6]  V. Garçon,et al.  Use of SeaWiFS data for light availability and parameter estimation of a phytoplankton production model of the Bay of Biscay , 2007 .

[7]  George C. Hurtt,et al.  A pelagic ecosystem model calibrated with BATS and OWSI data , 1999 .

[8]  Svetlana N. Losa,et al.  Weak constraint parameter estimation for a simple ocean ecosystem model: what can we learn about the model and data? , 2004 .

[9]  Scott C. Doney,et al.  Upper ocean ecosystem dynamics and iron cycling in a global three-dimensional model: GLOBAL ECOSYSTEM-BIOGEOCHEMICAL MODEL , 2004 .

[10]  M. Lévy,et al.  The Modulation of Biological Production by Oceanic Mesoscale Turbulence , 2008 .

[11]  T. R. Anderson,et al.  Medusa-1.0: a new intermediate complexity plankton ecosystem model for the global domain , 2010 .

[12]  M. Ouberdous,et al.  Assimilation of SeaWiFS data in a coupled physical biological model of the Adriatic Sea , 2003 .

[13]  Katja Fennel,et al.  Estimating time-dependent parameters for a biological ocean model using an emulator approach , 2012 .

[14]  Weitao Zhang,et al.  Bayesian calibration of mechanistic aquatic biogeochemical models and benefits for environmental management , 2008 .

[15]  B. V. Leer,et al.  Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. IV. A new approach to numerical convection , 1977 .

[16]  Richard J. Matear,et al.  Parameter optimisation of a marine ecosystem model at two contrasting stations in the Sub-Antarctic Zone , 2011 .

[17]  Fouad Badran,et al.  Improving the parameters of a global ocean biogeochemical model via variational assimilation of in situ data at five time series stations , 2011 .

[18]  Thomas R. Anderson,et al.  Parameter optimisation techniques and the problem of underdetermination in marine biogeochemical models , 2010 .

[19]  G. Evans,et al.  The Use of Optimization Techniques to Model Marine Ecosystem Dynamics at the JGOFS Station at 47 degrees N 20 degrees W [and Discussion] , 1995 .

[20]  M. Dowd Estimating parameters for a stochastic dynamic marine ecological system , 2011 .

[21]  Andrew J. Watson,et al.  Ecosystem dynamics based on plankton functional types for global ocean biogeochemistry models , 2005 .

[22]  Andreas Oschlies,et al.  Simultaneous data-based optimization of a 1D-ecosystem model at three locations in the North Atlantic: Part I— Method and parameter estimates , 2003 .

[23]  Audrey Estublier,et al.  Choice of an advection scheme for biogeochemical models , 2001 .

[24]  Thomas R. Anderson,et al.  Development of a robust marine ecosystem model to predict the role of iron in biogeochemical cycles: A comparison of results for iron-replete and iron-limited areas, and the SOIREE iron-enrichment experiment , 2006 .

[25]  Peter G. Challenor,et al.  Addressing the impact of environmental uncertainty in plankton model calibration with a dedicated software system: the Marine Model Optimization Testbed (MarMOT 1.1 alpha) , 2011 .

[26]  Radu Herbei,et al.  A Bayesian parameter estimation method applied to a marine ecosystem model for the coastal Gulf of Alaska , 2013 .

[27]  I. Totterdell,et al.  Production and export in a global ocean ecosystem model , 2001 .

[28]  Scott C. Doney,et al.  Assessment of skill and portability in regional marine biogeochemical models : Role of multiple planktonic groups , 2007 .

[29]  Marjorie A. M. Friedrichs,et al.  Ecosystem model complexity versus physical forcing: Quantification of their relative impact with assimilated Arabian Sea data , 2006 .

[30]  Galen A. McKinley,et al.  1-D test-bed calibration of a 3-D Lake Superior biogeochemical model , 2012 .

[31]  George B. Arhonditsis,et al.  A Bayesian hierarchical framework for calibrating aquatic biogeochemical models , 2009 .

[32]  Samar Khatiwala,et al.  A computational framework for simulation of biogeochemical tracers in the ocean , 2007 .

[33]  J. Toggweiler,et al.  A seasonal three‐dimensional ecosystem model of nitrogen cycling in the North Atlantic Euphotic Zone , 1993 .

[34]  Mevin B. Hooten,et al.  Assessing First-Order Emulator Inference for Physical Parameters in Nonlinear Mechanistic Models , 2011 .

[35]  M. E. Johnson,et al.  Minimax and maximin distance designs , 1990 .

[36]  Andreas Oschlies,et al.  Towards an assessment of simple global marine biogeochemical models of different complexity , 2010 .

[37]  Xianqing Lv,et al.  Data assimilation in a simple marine ecosystem model based on spatial biological parameterizations , 2009 .

[38]  A. OHagan,et al.  Bayesian analysis of computer code outputs: A tutorial , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[39]  M. Friedrichs,et al.  The assimilation of satellite‐derived data into a one‐dimensional lower trophic level marine ecosystem model , 2014 .

[40]  Kenneth S. Carslaw,et al.  Mapping the uncertainty in global CCN using emulation , 2012 .

[41]  C. Stow,et al.  Skill Assessment for Coupled Biological/Physical Models of Marine Systems. , 2009, Journal of marine systems : journal of the European Association of Marine Sciences and Techniques.

[42]  Andreas Oschlies,et al.  Basin-scale performance of a locally optimized marine ecosystem model , 2005 .

[43]  Thomas R. Anderson,et al.  When is a biogeochemical model too complex? Objective model reduction and selection for North Atlantic time-series sites , 2013 .

[44]  Keith Lindsay,et al.  Upper Ocean Ecosystem Dynamics and Iron Cycling in a Global 3 D Model by , 2004 .

[45]  Janet W. Campbell,et al.  The lognormal distribution as a model for bio‐optical variability in the sea , 1995 .

[46]  Michael Goldstein,et al.  History matching for exploring and reducing climate model parameter space using observations and a large perturbed physics ensemble , 2013, Climate Dynamics.

[47]  Graham Savidge,et al.  Modeling the relative contributions of autotrophs and heterotrophs to carbon flow at a Lagrangian JGOFS station in the Northeast Atlantic: The importance of DOC , 1999 .

[48]  A. O'Hagan,et al.  Bayesian calibration of computer models , 2001 .

[49]  J. Tjiputra,et al.  Assimilation of seasonal chlorophyll and nutrient data into an adjoint three‐dimensional ocean carbon cycle model: Sensitivity analysis and ecosystem parameter optimization , 2007 .

[50]  Jean-Michel Brankart,et al.  Stochastic estimation of biogeochemical parameters from Globcolour ocean colour satellite data in a North Atlantic 3D ocean coupled physical–biogeochemical model , 2013 .

[51]  Slawomir Koziel,et al.  Accelerated parameter identification in a 3D marine biogeochemical model using surrogate-based optimization , 2013 .

[52]  Katharina D. Six,et al.  Effects of plankton dynamics on seasonal carbon fluxes in an ocean general circulation model , 1996 .

[53]  J. Fiechter Assessing marine ecosystem model properties from ensemble calculations , 2012 .

[54]  L. Bopp,et al.  Globalizing results from ocean in situ iron fertilization studies , 2006 .

[55]  Christopher K. Wikle,et al.  Modeling 3‐D spatio‐temporal biogeochemical processes with a forest of 1‐D statistical emulators , 2013 .

[56]  Frédéric Hourdin,et al.  The Use of Finite-Volume Methods for Atmospheric Advection of Trace Species. Part I: Test of Various Formulations in a General Circulation Model , 1999 .

[57]  M. Gehlen,et al.  Skill assessment of three earth system models with common marine biogeochemistry , 2013, Climate Dynamics.

[58]  Samar Khatiwala,et al.  Fast spin up of Ocean biogeochemical models using matrix-free Newton–Krylov , 2008 .

[59]  Meric A. Srokosz,et al.  Split-domain calibration of an ecosystem model using satellite ocean colour data , 2004 .

[60]  Malte Prieß,et al.  Marine ecosystem model calibration with real data using enhanced surrogate-based optimization , 2013, J. Comput. Sci..