Examining the relationship between farmer participation in an agri-environment scheme and the quantity and quality of semi-natural habitats on Irish farms

[1]  Browne,et al.  The delivery of ecosystem services through results-based agri-environment payment schemes (RBPS): three Irish case studies , 2022, Biology and Environment: Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy.

[2]  J. Finn,et al.  A REVIEW OF EVIDENCE ON THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF IRELAND'S RURAL ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION SCHEME (REPS) , 2022, Biology and Environment: Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy.

[3]  R. Huber,et al.  Comparing effectiveness and return on investment of action‐ and results‐based agri‐environmental payments in S witzerland , 2021, American Journal of Agricultural Economics.

[4]  Lei Xu,et al.  The Impact of an Un(Der)Funded Inclusive Education Policy: Evidence from the 2013 China Education Panel Survey , 2021, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[5]  M. Ryan,et al.  More than two decades of Agri-Environment schemes: Has the profile of participating farms changed? , 2021, Journal of environmental management.

[6]  D. Cavicchioli,et al.  Estimating the CAP greening effect by machine learning techniques: A big data ex post analysis , 2021, Environmental Science & Policy.

[7]  Qian Zhang,et al.  Gains or losses? A quantitative estimation of environmental and economic effects of an ecological compensation policy. , 2021, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[8]  Emily A. Martin,et al.  A multitaxa assessment of the effectiveness of agri-environmental schemes for biodiversity management , 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  D. Viaggi,et al.  In search of factors determining the participation of farmers in agri-environmental schemes – Does only money matter in Poland? , 2021 .

[10]  E. Kihiu,et al.  Agricultural market access and dietary diversity in Kenya: Gender considerations towards improved household nutritional outcomes , 2020 .

[11]  M. Aubert,et al.  How does crop insurance influence pesticide use? Evidence from French farms , 2020, Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies.

[12]  Xiao-yuan Dong,et al.  Is rented accommodation a good choice for primary school students' academic performance? – Evidence from rural China , 2020 .

[13]  A. Povellato,et al.  Do differential payments for agri-environment schemes affect the environmental benefits? A case study in the North-Eastern Italy , 2020 .

[14]  M. Ryan,et al.  Impact of farmer self-identity and attitudes on participation in agri-environment schemes , 2020 .

[15]  D. Ó hUallacháin,et al.  Assessment of semi-natural habitats and landscape features on Irish farmland: New insights to inform EU Common Agricultural Policy implementation , 2020, Ambio.

[16]  F. Thorne,et al.  Participation in agri-environmental schemes: A contingent valuation study of farmers in Ireland. , 2020, Journal of environmental management.

[17]  E. Dillon,et al.  Can technology help achieve sustainable intensification? Evidence from milk recording on Irish dairy farms , 2020, Land use policy.

[18]  T. Hyvönen,et al.  The legitimacy of result-oriented and action-oriented agri-environmental schemes: A comparison of farmers’ and citizens’ perceptions , 2019 .

[19]  J. Finn,et al.  Semi-natural habitats and Ecological Focus Areas on cereal, beef and dairy farms in Ireland , 2019, Land Use Policy.

[20]  A. Webster,et al.  The gender pay gap in the USA: a matching study , 2019, Journal of Population Economics.

[21]  René van Bavel,et al.  Behavioural factors affecting the adoption of sustainable farming practices: a policy-oriented review , 2019, European Review of Agricultural Economics.

[22]  D. Chadwick,et al.  What can management option uptake tell us about ecosystem services delivery through agri-environment schemes? , 2019, Land Use Policy.

[23]  D. Ivajnšič,et al.  The failure of agri-environment measures to promote and conserve grassland biodiversity in Slovenia , 2019, Land Use Policy.

[24]  M. Raggi,et al.  AES Impact Evaluation With Integrated Farm Data: Combining Statistical Matching and Propensity Score Matching , 2018, Sustainability.

[25]  A. Barnes,et al.  Which factors influence farmers' intentions to adopt nutrient management planning? , 2018, Journal of environmental management.

[26]  Ray Franke,et al.  Taking a Break, or Taking a Class? Examining the Effects of Incentivized Summer Enrollment on Student Persistence , 2018, Research in Higher Education.

[27]  B. K. Jack,et al.  Self-selection into payments for ecosystem services programs , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  J. Subervie,et al.  Do European Agri-environment Measures Help Reduce Herbicide Use? Evidence From Viticulture in France , 2018, Ecological Economics.

[29]  K. Koffijberg,et al.  Present agri-environment measures in Europe are not sufficient for the conservation of a highly sensitive bird species, the Corncrake Crex crex , 2018 .

[30]  Allyson Flaster Kids, College, and Capital: Parental Financial Support and College Choice , 2018 .

[31]  E. Kebebe Household nutrition and income impacts of using dairy technologies in mixed crop–livestock production systems , 2017 .

[32]  J. Freer,et al.  The potential benefits of on-farm mitigation scenarios for reducing multiple pollutant loadings in prioritised agri-environment areas across England , 2017 .

[33]  S. Green,et al.  Farmland habitat diversity in Ireland , 2017 .

[34]  C. Rothe Robust Confidence Intervals for Average Treatment Effects Under Limited Overlap , 2017, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[35]  J. Finn,et al.  A comparison of grassland vegetation from three agri-environment conservation measures , 2016 .

[36]  F. Quétier,et al.  Challenges of achieving biodiversity offset outcomes through agri-environmental schemes: Evidence from an empirical study in Southern France , 2016, Ecological Economics.

[37]  Tomas Jusys Quantifying avoided deforestation in Pará: Protected areas, buffer zones and edge effects , 2016 .

[38]  J. Graaff,et al.  The role of EU agri-environmental measures preserving extensive grazing in two less-favoured areas in Portugal , 2016 .

[39]  P. Gibbons,et al.  The cost-effectiveness of agri-environment schemes for biodiversity conservation: A quantitative review , 2016 .

[40]  G. Garrod,et al.  What drives farmers’ participation in EU agri-environmental schemes?: Results from a qualitative meta-analysis , 2015 .

[41]  R. Greiner Motivations and attitudes influence farmers' willingness to participate in biodiversity conservation contracts , 2015 .

[42]  David Kleijn,et al.  The role of agri-environment schemes in conservation and environmental management , 2015, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[43]  Céline Nauges,et al.  Evaluating Greening Farm Policies: A Structural Model for Assessing Agri-environmental Subsidies , 2014, Land Economics.

[44]  G. Murphy,et al.  An investigation into the type of farmer who chose to participate in Rural Environment Protection Scheme (REPS) and the role of institutional change in influencing scheme effectiveness , 2014 .

[45]  W. Huffman,et al.  The Adoption and Impact of Soil and Water Conservation Technology: An Endogenous Switching Regression Application , 2014, Land Economics.

[46]  A. Mishra,et al.  Is participation in agri-environmental programs affected by liquidity and solvency? , 2013 .

[47]  J. Sekhon,et al.  Regression-adjusted matching and double-robust methods for estimating average treatment effects in health economic evaluation , 2013, Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology.

[48]  Jane C. Stout,et al.  Impacts of organic and conventional dairy farmer attitude, behaviour and knowledge on farm biodiversity in Ireland , 2013 .

[49]  J. Isselstein,et al.  Agri-environment schemes: Farmers’ acceptance and perception of potential ‘Payment by Results’ in grassland—A case study in England , 2013 .

[50]  K. Heanue,et al.  Quantifying the Effect of Discussion Group Membership on Technology Adoption and Farm Profit on Dairy Farms , 2012 .

[51]  S. Green,et al.  Assessing the compatibility of farmland biodiversity and habitats to the specifications of agri-environmental schemes using a multinomial logit approach , 2011 .

[52]  J. Finn,et al.  Pastoral farmland habitat diversity in south-east Ireland , 2011 .

[53]  Alexis Cerezo,et al.  Pasture area and landscape heterogeneity are key determinants of bird diversity in intensively managed farmland , 2011, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[54]  Kirsty J. Park,et al.  The effectiveness of agri‐environment schemes for the conservation of farmland moths: assessing the importance of a landscape‐scale management approach , 2011 .

[55]  P. Austin An Introduction to Propensity Score Methods for Reducing the Effects of Confounding in Observational Studies , 2011, Multivariate behavioral research.

[56]  P. Dupraz,et al.  Does intensity of change matter? Factors affecting adoption of agri-environmental schemes in Spain , 2010 .

[57]  Eric Ruto,et al.  What Do Farmers Want From Agri‐Environmental Scheme Design? A Choice Experiment Approach , 2010 .

[58]  Matias D. Cattaneo,et al.  Efficient semiparametric estimation of multi-valued treatment effects under ignorability , 2010 .

[59]  Oliver Kuss,et al.  The ongoing tyranny of statistical significance testing in biomedical research , 2010, European Journal of Epidemiology.

[60]  S. Hynes,et al.  Modelling farmers' participation in an agri-environmental scheme using panel data: an application to the rural environment protection scheme in Ireland. , 2009 .

[61]  C. Weiß,et al.  Evaluating the effects of farm programmes: results from propensity score matching , 2009 .

[62]  J. Peterseil,et al.  Impact of the Austrian Agri-environmental scheme on diversity of landscapes, plants and birds , 2008 .

[63]  Mario Díaz,et al.  Effects of landscape complexity on the ecological effectiveness of agri-environment schemes , 2008, Landscape Ecology.

[64]  Merit Mikk,et al.  Farmers’ perceptions of biodiversity and their willingness to enhance it through agri-environment schemes: A comparative study from Estonia and Finland , 2007 .

[65]  D. Gillmor,et al.  Effects of an agri-environment scheme on farmland biodiversity in Ireland , 2005 .

[66]  Marco Caliendo,et al.  Some Practical Guidance for the Implementation of Propensity Score Matching , 2005, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[67]  Rolf A. Groeneveld,et al.  Ecological Effectiveness of Agri‐Environment Schemes in Different Agricultural Landscapes in The Netherlands , 2004 .

[68]  William J. Sutherland,et al.  How effective are European agri‐environment schemes in conserving and promoting biodiversity? , 2003 .

[69]  John Feehan,et al.  Developing a field boundary evaluation and grading system in Ireland , 2003 .

[70]  P. Dupraz,et al.  The Environmental Supply of Farm Households: A Flexible Willingness to Accept Model , 2003 .

[71]  T. Benton,et al.  Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key? , 2003 .

[72]  G. Wilson,et al.  Financial Imperative or Conservation Concern? EU Farmers' Motivations for Participation in Voluntary Agri-Environmental Schemes , 2000 .

[73]  D. Rubin,et al.  The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects , 1983 .

[74]  OUP accepted manuscript , 2021, European Review Of Agricultural Economics.

[75]  OUP accepted manuscript , 2021, European Review of Agricultural Economics.

[76]  Ireland ’ s Environment – An Integrated Assessment 2020 , 2020 .

[77]  Giacomo Aletti,et al.  Estimating the effects of agri-environmental measures using difference-in-difference coarsened exact matching , 2020 .

[78]  Romy Greiner,et al.  Farmers’ intrinsic motivations, barriers to the adoption of conservation practices and effectiveness of policy instruments: Empirical evidence from northern Australia , 2011 .

[79]  K. Salhofer,et al.  Self-selection as a problem in evaluating agri-environmental programs /доклад на 87 семинаре ЕААЕ, Assessing Rural Development Policies of the CAP, Vienna, Austria, 21-23 April 2004 , 2004 .

[80]  J. Heckman Sample selection bias as a specification error , 1979 .