Examining the relationship between farmer participation in an agri-environment scheme and the quantity and quality of semi-natural habitats on Irish farms
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Browne,et al. The delivery of ecosystem services through results-based agri-environment payment schemes (RBPS): three Irish case studies , 2022, Biology and Environment: Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy.
[2] J. Finn,et al. A REVIEW OF EVIDENCE ON THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF IRELAND'S RURAL ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION SCHEME (REPS) , 2022, Biology and Environment: Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy.
[3] R. Huber,et al. Comparing effectiveness and return on investment of action‐ and results‐based agri‐environmental payments in S witzerland , 2021, American Journal of Agricultural Economics.
[4] Lei Xu,et al. The Impact of an Un(Der)Funded Inclusive Education Policy: Evidence from the 2013 China Education Panel Survey , 2021, SSRN Electronic Journal.
[5] M. Ryan,et al. More than two decades of Agri-Environment schemes: Has the profile of participating farms changed? , 2021, Journal of environmental management.
[6] D. Cavicchioli,et al. Estimating the CAP greening effect by machine learning techniques: A big data ex post analysis , 2021, Environmental Science & Policy.
[7] Qian Zhang,et al. Gains or losses? A quantitative estimation of environmental and economic effects of an ecological compensation policy. , 2021, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.
[8] Emily A. Martin,et al. A multitaxa assessment of the effectiveness of agri-environmental schemes for biodiversity management , 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[9] D. Viaggi,et al. In search of factors determining the participation of farmers in agri-environmental schemes – Does only money matter in Poland? , 2021 .
[10] E. Kihiu,et al. Agricultural market access and dietary diversity in Kenya: Gender considerations towards improved household nutritional outcomes , 2020 .
[11] M. Aubert,et al. How does crop insurance influence pesticide use? Evidence from French farms , 2020, Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies.
[12] Xiao-yuan Dong,et al. Is rented accommodation a good choice for primary school students' academic performance? – Evidence from rural China , 2020 .
[13] A. Povellato,et al. Do differential payments for agri-environment schemes affect the environmental benefits? A case study in the North-Eastern Italy , 2020 .
[14] M. Ryan,et al. Impact of farmer self-identity and attitudes on participation in agri-environment schemes , 2020 .
[15] D. Ó hUallacháin,et al. Assessment of semi-natural habitats and landscape features on Irish farmland: New insights to inform EU Common Agricultural Policy implementation , 2020, Ambio.
[16] F. Thorne,et al. Participation in agri-environmental schemes: A contingent valuation study of farmers in Ireland. , 2020, Journal of environmental management.
[17] E. Dillon,et al. Can technology help achieve sustainable intensification? Evidence from milk recording on Irish dairy farms , 2020, Land use policy.
[18] T. Hyvönen,et al. The legitimacy of result-oriented and action-oriented agri-environmental schemes: A comparison of farmers’ and citizens’ perceptions , 2019 .
[19] J. Finn,et al. Semi-natural habitats and Ecological Focus Areas on cereal, beef and dairy farms in Ireland , 2019, Land Use Policy.
[20] A. Webster,et al. The gender pay gap in the USA: a matching study , 2019, Journal of Population Economics.
[21] René van Bavel,et al. Behavioural factors affecting the adoption of sustainable farming practices: a policy-oriented review , 2019, European Review of Agricultural Economics.
[22] D. Chadwick,et al. What can management option uptake tell us about ecosystem services delivery through agri-environment schemes? , 2019, Land Use Policy.
[23] D. Ivajnšič,et al. The failure of agri-environment measures to promote and conserve grassland biodiversity in Slovenia , 2019, Land Use Policy.
[24] M. Raggi,et al. AES Impact Evaluation With Integrated Farm Data: Combining Statistical Matching and Propensity Score Matching , 2018, Sustainability.
[25] A. Barnes,et al. Which factors influence farmers' intentions to adopt nutrient management planning? , 2018, Journal of environmental management.
[26] Ray Franke,et al. Taking a Break, or Taking a Class? Examining the Effects of Incentivized Summer Enrollment on Student Persistence , 2018, Research in Higher Education.
[27] B. K. Jack,et al. Self-selection into payments for ecosystem services programs , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[28] J. Subervie,et al. Do European Agri-environment Measures Help Reduce Herbicide Use? Evidence From Viticulture in France , 2018, Ecological Economics.
[29] K. Koffijberg,et al. Present agri-environment measures in Europe are not sufficient for the conservation of a highly sensitive bird species, the Corncrake Crex crex , 2018 .
[30] Allyson Flaster. Kids, College, and Capital: Parental Financial Support and College Choice , 2018 .
[31] E. Kebebe. Household nutrition and income impacts of using dairy technologies in mixed crop–livestock production systems , 2017 .
[32] J. Freer,et al. The potential benefits of on-farm mitigation scenarios for reducing multiple pollutant loadings in prioritised agri-environment areas across England , 2017 .
[33] S. Green,et al. Farmland habitat diversity in Ireland , 2017 .
[34] C. Rothe. Robust Confidence Intervals for Average Treatment Effects Under Limited Overlap , 2017, SSRN Electronic Journal.
[35] J. Finn,et al. A comparison of grassland vegetation from three agri-environment conservation measures , 2016 .
[36] F. Quétier,et al. Challenges of achieving biodiversity offset outcomes through agri-environmental schemes: Evidence from an empirical study in Southern France , 2016, Ecological Economics.
[37] Tomas Jusys. Quantifying avoided deforestation in Pará: Protected areas, buffer zones and edge effects , 2016 .
[38] J. Graaff,et al. The role of EU agri-environmental measures preserving extensive grazing in two less-favoured areas in Portugal , 2016 .
[39] P. Gibbons,et al. The cost-effectiveness of agri-environment schemes for biodiversity conservation: A quantitative review , 2016 .
[40] G. Garrod,et al. What drives farmers’ participation in EU agri-environmental schemes?: Results from a qualitative meta-analysis , 2015 .
[41] R. Greiner. Motivations and attitudes influence farmers' willingness to participate in biodiversity conservation contracts , 2015 .
[42] David Kleijn,et al. The role of agri-environment schemes in conservation and environmental management , 2015, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.
[43] Céline Nauges,et al. Evaluating Greening Farm Policies: A Structural Model for Assessing Agri-environmental Subsidies , 2014, Land Economics.
[44] G. Murphy,et al. An investigation into the type of farmer who chose to participate in Rural Environment Protection Scheme (REPS) and the role of institutional change in influencing scheme effectiveness , 2014 .
[45] W. Huffman,et al. The Adoption and Impact of Soil and Water Conservation Technology: An Endogenous Switching Regression Application , 2014, Land Economics.
[46] A. Mishra,et al. Is participation in agri-environmental programs affected by liquidity and solvency? , 2013 .
[47] J. Sekhon,et al. Regression-adjusted matching and double-robust methods for estimating average treatment effects in health economic evaluation , 2013, Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology.
[48] Jane C. Stout,et al. Impacts of organic and conventional dairy farmer attitude, behaviour and knowledge on farm biodiversity in Ireland , 2013 .
[49] J. Isselstein,et al. Agri-environment schemes: Farmers’ acceptance and perception of potential ‘Payment by Results’ in grassland—A case study in England , 2013 .
[50] K. Heanue,et al. Quantifying the Effect of Discussion Group Membership on Technology Adoption and Farm Profit on Dairy Farms , 2012 .
[51] S. Green,et al. Assessing the compatibility of farmland biodiversity and habitats to the specifications of agri-environmental schemes using a multinomial logit approach , 2011 .
[52] J. Finn,et al. Pastoral farmland habitat diversity in south-east Ireland , 2011 .
[53] Alexis Cerezo,et al. Pasture area and landscape heterogeneity are key determinants of bird diversity in intensively managed farmland , 2011, Biodiversity and Conservation.
[54] Kirsty J. Park,et al. The effectiveness of agri‐environment schemes for the conservation of farmland moths: assessing the importance of a landscape‐scale management approach , 2011 .
[55] P. Austin. An Introduction to Propensity Score Methods for Reducing the Effects of Confounding in Observational Studies , 2011, Multivariate behavioral research.
[56] P. Dupraz,et al. Does intensity of change matter? Factors affecting adoption of agri-environmental schemes in Spain , 2010 .
[57] Eric Ruto,et al. What Do Farmers Want From Agri‐Environmental Scheme Design? A Choice Experiment Approach , 2010 .
[58] Matias D. Cattaneo,et al. Efficient semiparametric estimation of multi-valued treatment effects under ignorability , 2010 .
[59] Oliver Kuss,et al. The ongoing tyranny of statistical significance testing in biomedical research , 2010, European Journal of Epidemiology.
[60] S. Hynes,et al. Modelling farmers' participation in an agri-environmental scheme using panel data: an application to the rural environment protection scheme in Ireland. , 2009 .
[61] C. Weiß,et al. Evaluating the effects of farm programmes: results from propensity score matching , 2009 .
[62] J. Peterseil,et al. Impact of the Austrian Agri-environmental scheme on diversity of landscapes, plants and birds , 2008 .
[63] Mario Díaz,et al. Effects of landscape complexity on the ecological effectiveness of agri-environment schemes , 2008, Landscape Ecology.
[64] Merit Mikk,et al. Farmers’ perceptions of biodiversity and their willingness to enhance it through agri-environment schemes: A comparative study from Estonia and Finland , 2007 .
[65] D. Gillmor,et al. Effects of an agri-environment scheme on farmland biodiversity in Ireland , 2005 .
[66] Marco Caliendo,et al. Some Practical Guidance for the Implementation of Propensity Score Matching , 2005, SSRN Electronic Journal.
[67] Rolf A. Groeneveld,et al. Ecological Effectiveness of Agri‐Environment Schemes in Different Agricultural Landscapes in The Netherlands , 2004 .
[68] William J. Sutherland,et al. How effective are European agri‐environment schemes in conserving and promoting biodiversity? , 2003 .
[69] John Feehan,et al. Developing a field boundary evaluation and grading system in Ireland , 2003 .
[70] P. Dupraz,et al. The Environmental Supply of Farm Households: A Flexible Willingness to Accept Model , 2003 .
[71] T. Benton,et al. Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key? , 2003 .
[72] G. Wilson,et al. Financial Imperative or Conservation Concern? EU Farmers' Motivations for Participation in Voluntary Agri-Environmental Schemes , 2000 .
[73] D. Rubin,et al. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects , 1983 .
[74] OUP accepted manuscript , 2021, European Review Of Agricultural Economics.
[75] OUP accepted manuscript , 2021, European Review of Agricultural Economics.
[76] Ireland ’ s Environment – An Integrated Assessment 2020 , 2020 .
[77] Giacomo Aletti,et al. Estimating the effects of agri-environmental measures using difference-in-difference coarsened exact matching , 2020 .
[78] Romy Greiner,et al. Farmers’ intrinsic motivations, barriers to the adoption of conservation practices and effectiveness of policy instruments: Empirical evidence from northern Australia , 2011 .
[79] K. Salhofer,et al. Self-selection as a problem in evaluating agri-environmental programs /доклад на 87 семинаре ЕААЕ, Assessing Rural Development Policies of the CAP, Vienna, Austria, 21-23 April 2004 , 2004 .
[80] J. Heckman. Sample selection bias as a specification error , 1979 .