Intravascular ultrasound criteria for the assessment of the functional significance of intermediate coronary artery stenoses and comparison with fractional flow reserve.

[1]  K Suzuki,et al.  Clinical potential of intravascular ultrasound for physiological assessment of coronary stenosis: relationship between quantitative ultrasound tomography and pressure-derived fractional flow reserve. , 1999, Circulation.

[2]  M. Leon,et al.  Long-term follow-up after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty was not performed based on intravascular ultrasound findings: importance of lumen dimensions. , 1999, Circulation.

[3]  G. Stone,et al.  Preintervention arterial remodeling as an independent predictor of target-lesion revascularization after nonstent coronary intervention: an analysis of 777 lesions with intravascular ultrasound imaging. , 1999, Circulation.

[4]  D. Berman,et al.  Clinical validation of intravascular ultrasound imaging for assessment of coronary stenosis severity: comparison with stress myocardial perfusion imaging. , 1999, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  M. Leon,et al.  Clinical, intravascular ultrasound, and quantitative angiographic determinants of the coronary flow reserve before and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. , 1998, The American journal of cardiology.

[6]  R. Erbel,et al.  Improved assessment of coronary stenosis severity using the relative flow velocity reserve. , 1998, Circulation.

[7]  W. Wijns,et al.  Long-term follow-up after deferral of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty of intermediate stenosis on the basis of coronary pressure measurement. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  M. Kern,et al.  From research to clinical practice: current role of intracoronary physiologically based decision making in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  P. H. van der Voort,et al.  Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  M. Leon,et al.  In vivo validation of intravascular ultrasound length measurements using a motorized transducer pullback system. , 1996, The American journal of cardiology.

[11]  N. Pijls,et al.  Fractional Flow Reserve , 1995 .

[12]  P. H. van der Voort,et al.  Fractional flow reserve. A useful index to evaluate the influence of an epicardial coronary stenosis on myocardial blood flow. , 1995, Circulation.

[13]  J. Bartunek,et al.  Quantitative coronary angiography in predicting functional significance of stenoses in an unselected patient cohort. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  P Hall,et al.  Intracoronary stenting without anticoagulation accomplished with intravascular ultrasound guidance. , 1995, Circulation.

[15]  T. Ryan.  Guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Assessment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Cardiovascular Procedures (Subcommittee on Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty). , 1988, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  F. Loop,et al.  Guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Assessment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Cardiovascular Procedures (Subcommittee on Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty). , 1988, Circulation.

[17]  N. Mullani,et al.  Relation between geometric dimensions of coronary artery stenoses and myocardial perfusion reserve in man. , 1987, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[18]  George Stricker,et al.  From Research to Clinical Practice , 1985, Springer US.