The differential effects of agency costs on multinational corporations

This study develops arguments explaining why agency costs are more pronounced for firms with higher degrees of multinational business. Empirical tests are conducted to determine whether firms with more exposure to foreign markets have greater agency costs than less exposed firms. Specifically, valuation effects of security offerings are assessed cross-sectionally to determine whether the change in the firm's value attributed to agency costs is associated with the firm's degree of international business. It was found that valuation effects associated with security offering announcements are more negative for firms with higher degrees of international business, which supports the hypothesis presented. The results suggest that better monitoring could be especially beneficial to MNCs with large exposure to foreign markets.

[1]  A. Shleifer,et al.  Management Ownership and Market Valuation: An Empirical Analysis , 1988 .

[2]  Diane K. Schooley,et al.  USING DIVIDEND POLICY AND MANAGERIAL OWNERSHIP TO REDUCE AGENCY COSTS , 1994 .

[3]  Kevin Lee,et al.  Institutional investment, mergers and the market for corporate control☆ , 1989 .

[4]  P. Asquith,et al.  Equity issues and offering dilution , 1986 .

[5]  C. Bartlett,et al.  Managing Across Borders: New Strategic Requirements , 1987 .

[6]  B. Eckbo,et al.  Valuation Effects of Corporate Debt Offerings , 1985 .

[7]  Ronald W. Masulis,et al.  Seasoned Equity Offerings: An Empirical Investigation , 1986 .

[8]  Ronald F. Singer,et al.  Valuation Effect Of Issuing Nonsubordinated Versus Subordinated Debt , 1993 .

[9]  Vojislav Maksimovic,et al.  Consistent Estimation of Cross-Sectional Models in Event Studies , 1990 .

[10]  W. Mikkelson,et al.  Managers' voting rights and corporate control , 1989 .

[11]  Clifford W. Smith INVESTMENT BANKING AND THE CAPITAL ACQUISITION PROCESS , 1986 .

[12]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  THEORY OF THE FIRM: MANAGERIAL BEHAVIOR, AGENCY COSTS AND OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE , 1976 .

[13]  L. Leemis Applied Linear Regression Models , 1991 .

[14]  A. Jaeger,et al.  Multinational Corporations: Control Systems and Delegation Issues , 1984 .

[15]  Separation of Ownership and Control , 1983, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[16]  Lemma W. Senbet,et al.  Market Imperfections, Agency Problems, and Capital Structure: A Review , 1981 .

[17]  Y. Doz Strategic Management in Multinational Companies , 1986 .

[18]  Steven Huddart The effect of a large shareholder on corporate value , 1993 .

[19]  I. Karafiath,et al.  Using Dummy Variables in the Event Methodology , 1988 .

[20]  John Joseph McCall,et al.  The Economics of Information and Uncertainty , 1982 .

[21]  I. Karafiath,et al.  On the Efficiency of Least Squares Regression with Security Abnormal Returns as the Dependent Variable , 1994, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[22]  Jerold B. Warner,et al.  The Distribution of Power Among Corporate Managers, Shareholders, and Directors , 1988 .

[23]  J. Jarillo,et al.  The Evolution of Research on Coordination Mechanisms in Multinational Corporations , 1989 .

[24]  Larry Y. Dann,et al.  Convertible debt issuance, capital structure change and financing-related information: Some new evidence , 1984 .

[25]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers , 1999 .

[26]  W. Mikkelson,et al.  Valuation effects of security offerings and the issuance process , 1986 .

[27]  James A. Brickley,et al.  Ownership structure and voting on antitakeover amendments , 1988 .

[28]  E. Fama,et al.  Agency Problems and Residual Claims , 1983 .

[29]  Rex Thompson,et al.  AN APPROACH TO STATISTICAL-INFERENCE IN CROSS-SECTIONAL MODELS WITH SECURITY ABNORMAL RETURNS AS DEPENDENT VARIABLE , 1986 .

[30]  William L. Megginson,et al.  Restricted Voting Stock, Acquisition Premiums, and the Market Value of Corporate Control , 1990 .

[31]  J. Hennart,et al.  Control in Multinational Firms: the Role of Price and Hierarchy , 1993 .

[32]  Oliver Hart,et al.  Corporate Financial Structure and Managerial Incentives , 1983 .

[33]  George P. Tsetsekos,et al.  Institutional Ownership and the Liquidity of Common Stock Offerings , 1992 .

[34]  John Mcconnell,et al.  Additional evidence on equity ownership and corporate value , 1990 .

[35]  David A. Ricks,et al.  Multinational Parent Companies’ Influence over Human Resource Decisions of Affiliates: U.S. Firms in Mexico , 1989 .

[36]  E. Fama,et al.  Separation of Ownership and Control , 1983, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[37]  G. Hofstede Motivation, leadership, and organization: Do American theories apply abroad? , 1980 .

[38]  Harry DeAngelo,et al.  Managerial ownership of voting rights: A study of public corporations with dual classes of common stock☆ , 1985 .

[39]  B. Balachandran,et al.  More Powerful Portfolio Approaches to Regressing Abnormal Returns on Firm‐Specific Variables for Cross‐Sectional Studies , 1992 .