The Environment as a Stakeholder? A Fairness-Based Approach

Stakeholder theory is often unable to distinguish those individuals and groups that are stakeholders from those that are not. This problem of stakeholder identity has recently been addressed by linking stakeholder theory to a Rawlsian principle of fairness. To illustrate, the question of stakeholder status for the non-human environment is discussed. This essay criticizes a past attempt to ascribe stakeholder status to the non-human environment, which utilized a broad definition of the term "stakeholder." This paper then demonstrates how, despite the denial of stakeholder status, the environment is nonetheless accounted for on a fairness-based approach through legitimate organizational stakeholders. In addition, since stakeholder theory has never claimed to be a comprehensive ethical scheme, it is argued that sound reasons might exist for managers to consider their organization's impact on the environment that are not stakeholder-related.

[1]  R. Freeman.  Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach , 2010 .

[2]  L. Preston,et al.  The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications , 1995 .

[3]  D. Vandeveer,et al.  Rights, justice, and the bounds of liberty , 1980 .

[4]  D. Wood,et al.  Business and Society , 1990 .

[5]  Peter Singer,et al.  In Defense of Animals , 1985 .

[6]  R. Nozick.  Anarchy, State, and Utopia , 1975, Princeton Readings in Political Thought.

[7]  R. Phillips.  Stakeholder Theory and A Principle of Fairness , 1997, Business Ethics Quarterly.

[8]  Dianne Dumanoski,et al.  Our Stolen Future , 1996 .

[9]  T. Regan.  The Case for Animal Rights , 1983 .

[10]  K. Warren,et al.  The Power and the Promise of Ecological Feminism , 1990 .

[11]  T. Jones.  INSTRUMENTAL STAKEHOLDER THEORY: A SYNTHESIS OF ETHICS AND ECONOMICS , 1995 .

[12]  R. Eckersley,et al.  Environmentalism And Political Theory: Toward An Ecocentric Approach , 1992 .

[13]  R. King.  Caring about Nature: Feminist Ethics and the Environment , 1991, Hypatia.

[14]  Mark Starik,et al.  Should trees have managerial standing? Toward stakeholder status for non-human nature , 1995 .

[15]  Bryan G. Norton,et al.  Environmental Ethics and Weak Anthropocentrism , 1984 .

[16]  B. K. Burton,et al.  Feminist Ethics as Moral Grounding for Stakeholder Theory , 1996, Business Ethics Quarterly.

[17]  T. Jones,et al.  Stakeholder‐Agency Theory , 1992 .

[18]  M. Clarkson.  A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance , 1995 .

[19]  Isaiah Berlin,et al.  Two Concepts of Liberty , 1958 .

[20]  A. Simmons.  Moral Principles and Political Obligations , 1980 .

[21]  Paul W. Taylor,et al.  Respect for Nature , 2011, The Virtues of Sustainability.

[22]  A. Wicks,et al.  A Feminist Reinterpretation of The Stakeholder Concept , 1994, Business Ethics Quarterly.

[23]  Thomas Donaldson,et al.  The ethics of international business , 1989 .

[24]  W. Evan,et al.  Corporate governance: A stakeholder interpretation , 1990 .

[25]  Tim Rowley.  Moving Beyond Dyadic Ties: A Network Theory of Stakeholder Influences , 1997 .

[26]  Laura Westra,et al.  A New Environmental EthicAn Environmental Proposal for Ethics: The Principle of Integrity , 1994 .

[27]  Garrett Hardin,et al.  Should Trees Have Standing?: Toward Legal Rights for Natural Objects , 2012 .

[28]  Ronald K. Mitchell,et al.  Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of who and What Really Counts , 1997 .

[29]  Holmes Rolston,et al.  Conserving Natural Value , 1994 .

[30]  G. Brundtland,et al.  Our common future , 1987 .

[31]  Kenneth E. Goodpaster,et al.  On Being Morally Considerable , 1978 .

[32]  R. Freeman.  The Politics of Stakeholder Theory: Some Future Directions , 1994, Business Ethics Quarterly.

[33]  J. Boatright.  Fiduciary Duties and the Shareholder-Management Relation: or, What's so Special About Shareholders? , 1994, Business Ethics Quarterly.