Rotation reveals the importance of configural cues in handwritten word perception

A dramatic perceptual asymmetry occurs when handwritten words are rotated 90 ° in either direction. Those rotated in a direction consistent with their natural tilt (typically clockwise) become much more difficult to recognize, relative to those rotated in the opposite direction. In Experiment 1, we compared computer-printed and handwritten words, all equated for degrees of leftward and rightward tilt, and verified the phenomenon: The effect of rotation was far larger for cursive words, especially when they were rotated in a tilt-consistent direction. In Experiment 2, we replicated this pattern with all items being presented in visual noise. In both experiments, word frequency effects were larger for computer-printed words and did not interact with rotation. The results suggest that handwritten word perception requires greater configural processing, relative to computer print, because handwritten letters are variable and ambiguous. When words are rotated, configural processing suffers, particularly when rotation exaggerates the natural tilt. Our account is similar to theories of the “Thatcher illusion,” wherein face inversion disrupts holistic processing. Together, the findings suggest that configural, word-level processing automatically increases when people read handwriting, as letter-level processing becomes less reliable.

[1]  P. Jolicoeur,et al.  The time to identify disoriented letters: effects of practice and font. , 1987, Canadian journal of psychology.

[2]  John R. Beech,et al.  The Word Shape Hypothesis Re-Examined: Evidence for an External Feature Advantage in Visual Word Recognition. , 2005 .

[3]  Neal F. Johnson,et al.  On the function of letters in word identification: Some data and a preliminary model , 1975 .

[4]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[5]  J. Norman,et al.  Reading rotated words. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  R. Dodge.  The Psychology and Pedagogy of Reading, with a review of the history of reading and writing, and of methods, texts, and hygiene in reading , 1908 .

[7]  James L. McClelland.  Letter and configuration information in word identification , 1977 .

[8]  David L. Sheinberg,et al.  Does Thompson's Thatcher Effect Reflect a Face-Specific Mechanism? , 2010, Perception.

[9]  J. Bartlett,et al.  Inversion and Configuration of Faces , 1993, Cognitive Psychology.

[10]  Park Te.  Optical illusions in invertions. , 1983 .

[11]  P. Thompson,et al.  Margaret Thatcher: A New Illusion , 1980, Perception.

[12]  Linda Jeffery,et al.  Now You See It, Now You Don’t , 2010, Psychological science.

[13]  Francis K C Hui,et al.  The arcsine is asinine: the analysis of proportions in ecology. , 2011, Ecology.

[14]  Thomas H. Killion,et al.  Interaction of visual and cognitive effects in word recognition. , 1977 .

[15]  K R Paap,et al.  Word shape's in poor shape for the race to the lexicon. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  James C. Johnston,et al.  Reading and the mental lexicon: on the uptake of visual information , 1989 .

[17]  J. Coney.  Word frequency and the lateralization of lexical processes , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[18]  Marc Brys,et al.  Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English , 2009 .

[19]  Claus-Christian Carbon,et al.  Faces as Objects of Non-Expertise: Processing of Thatcherised Faces in Congenital Prosopagnosia , 2007, Perception.

[20]  G. McConkie,et al.  The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading , 1975 .

[21]  Mark W. Becker,et al.  Attending to a misoriented word causes the eyeball to rotate in the head , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[22]  J. Freyd,et al.  Representing the dynamics of a static form , 1983, Memory & cognition.

[23]  I Rock,et al.  On Thompson's Inverted-Face Phenomenon (Research Note) , 1988, Perception.

[24]  Michael B. Lewis,et al.  The Lady'S Not for Turning: Rotation of the Thatcher Illusion , 2001, Perception.

[25]  I. Rock,et al.  Illusory Contour Lightness: A Neglected Possibility , 1983, Perception.

[26]  J. M. Cattell.  THE TIME TAKEN UP BY CEREBRAL OPERATIONS , 1886 .

[27]  Stephen D Goldinger,et al.  Interpreting chicken-scratch: lexical access for handwritten words. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  R. Shepard,et al.  Mental Images and Their Transformations , 1982 .

[29]  Kenneth R. Paap,et al.  Word shape's in poor shape for the race to the lexicon. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.