Computational and experimental analysis of DNA shuffling

We describe a computational model of DNA shuffling based on the thermodynamics and kinetics of this process. The model independently tracks a representative ensemble of DNA molecules and records their states at every stage of a shuffling reaction. These data can subsequently be analyzed to yield information on any relevant metric, including reassembly efficiency, crossover number, type and distribution, and DNA sequence length distributions. The predictive ability of the model was validated by comparison to three independent sets of experimental data, and analysis of the simulation results led to several unique insights into the DNA shuffling process. We examine a tradeoff between crossover frequency and reassembly efficiency and illustrate the effects of experimental parameters on this relationship. Furthermore, we discuss conditions that promote the formation of useless “junk” DNA sequences or multimeric sequences containing multiple copies of the reassembled product. This model will therefore aid in the design of optimal shuffling reaction conditions.

[1]  S. Govindarajan,et al.  Advances in directed protein evolution by recursive genetic recombination: applications to therapeutic proteins. , 2001, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[2]  Frances H Arnold,et al.  Analysis of shuffled gene libraries. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[3]  E Schütz,et al.  Oligonucleotide melting temperatures under PCR conditions: nearest-neighbor corrections for Mg(2+), deoxynucleotide triphosphate, and dimethyl sulfoxide concentrations with comparison to alternative empirical formulas. , 2001, Clinical chemistry.

[4]  F. Arnold,et al.  Functional and nonfunctional mutations distinguished by random recombination of homologous genes. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  C D Maranas,et al.  Predicting crossover generation in DNA shuffling , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  K D Wittrup,et al.  Directed evolution of antibody fragments with monovalent femtomolar antigen-binding affinity. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  I. Pastan,et al.  Random recombination of antibody single chain Fv sequences after fragmentation with DNaseI in the presence of Mn2+. , 1995, Nucleic acids research.

[8]  Fengzhu Sun.  Modeling DNA Shuffling , 1999, J. Comput. Biol..

[9]  R. Samulski,et al.  AAV vectors: is clinical success on the horizon? , 2000, Gene Therapy.

[10]  W. Stemmer.  DNA shuffling by random fragmentation and reassembly: in vitro recombination for molecular evolution. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  F. Arnold,et al.  Designed evolution of enzymatic properties. , 2000, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[12]  J. SantaLucia,et al.  Thermodynamics of internal C.T mismatches in DNA. , 1998, Nucleic acids research.

[13]  F. Arnold,et al.  Optimization of DNA shuffling for high fidelity recombination. , 1997, Nucleic acids research.

[14]  J. SantaLucia,et al.  Nearest neighbor thermodynamic parameters for internal G.A mismatches in DNA. , 1998, Biochemistry.

[15]  Costas D Maranas,et al.  Predicting out-of-sequence reassembly in DNA shuffling. , 2002, Journal of theoretical biology.

[16]  J. SantaLucia,et al.  Thermodynamics and NMR of internal G.T mismatches in DNA. , 1997, Biochemistry.

[17]  M. Deem,et al.  A hierarchical approach to protein molecular evolution. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  J. SantaLucia,et al.  Nearest-neighbor thermodynamics of internal A.C mismatches in DNA: sequence dependence and pH effects. , 1998, Biochemistry.

[19]  J. SantaLucia,et al.  A unified view of polymer, dumbbell, and oligonucleotide DNA nearest-neighbor thermodynamics. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  W. Stemmer,et al.  Breeding of retroviruses by DNA shuffling for improved stability and processing yields , 2000, Nature Biotechnology.

[21]  L. Loeb,et al.  One small StEP in molecular evolution… , 1998, Nature Biotechnology.

[22]  C D Maranas,et al.  Modeling DNA mutation and recombination for directed evolution experiments. , 2000, Journal of theoretical biology.