Orientation and motion of a plasma discontinuity from single‐spacecraft measurements: Generic residue analysis of Cluster data

(1) A unified minimum-residue approach is presented to the use of classical conservation laws for determination of the orientation and motion of a plasma discontinuity, using data from a single spacecraft that traverses the discontinuity and makes measurements, not only on its two sides but also within it. The method is a generalization of the minimum Faraday residue (MFR) analysis technique described by Khrabrov and Sonnerup (1998a). It includes not only the standard MHD conservation laws for mass, momentum, total energy, and (where applicable) entropy, but also magnetic flux conservation from Faraday's law, absence of magnetic poles from rB = 0, and electric charge conservation from Ampere's law. A method, denoted by COM, for combining the results from more than one conservation law into a single optimal determination of the orientation and motion is presented, along with a general approach to the application of a certain class of constraints that can be placed on the vector normal to the discontinuity. The methodology, which is applicable to many types of discontinuity, including shocks, is illustrated by analysis of one magnetopause encounter by two of the four Cluster spacecraft (C1 and C3). The results from the various individual methods have considerable spread. However, in favorable circumstances and by exercising considerable care, the vector normal to the magnetopause from COM can be accurate to within a couple of degrees. For the C1 crossing, believed to be nearly a tangential discontinuity, albeit with signatures of incipient reconnection, the magnetopause speed (� 56 km s � 1 ) from COM appears accurate to within a few km s � 1 . The plasma flow across the magnetopause and the normal field component are both very nearly zero, and the results are consistent with those obtained from timing of the layer as it crosses the four Cluster spacecraft (assuming a constant thickness of the layer). The results for the velocity of the magnetopause and for the plasma flow across the layer are less consistent for the C3 crossing, believed to be a rotational discontinuity. For this crossing the presence of a component of the magnetic field along the normal direction could not be established with certitude. It is likely that the lower quality of the results for this crossing is caused by local multidimensional structure of the magnetopause.

[1]  M. Dunlop,et al.  Motion of observed structures calculated from multi‐point magnetic field measurements: Application to Cluster , 2006 .

[2]  M. Dunlop,et al.  Discontinuity analysis with cluster , 2006 .

[3]  A. Vaivads,et al.  Characteristics of the near-tail dawn magnetopause and boundary layer , 2005 .

[4]  M. Dunlop,et al.  Dimensional analysis of observed structures using multipoint magnetic field measurements: Application to Cluster , 2005 .

[5]  M. Dunlop,et al.  Optimal reconstruction of magnetopause structures from Cluster data , 2005 .

[6]  H. Reme,et al.  Multiple Flux Rope Events at the High-Latitude Magnetopause: Cluster/Rapid Observation on 26 January, 2001 , 2005 .

[7]  Chijie Xiao,et al.  Inferring of flux rope orientation with the minimum variance analysis technique , 2004 .

[8]  M. W. Dunlop,et al.  Orientation and motion of a discontinuity from Cluster curlometer capability: Minimum variance of current density , 2004 .

[9]  M. Dunlop,et al.  Four-spacecraft determination of magnetopause orientation, motion and thickness: comparison with results from single-spacecraft methods , 2004 .

[10]  M. Dunlop,et al.  Reconstruction of two-dimensional magnetopause structures from Cluster observations: verification of method , 2004 .

[11]  M. Dunlop,et al.  Orientation and motion of a discontinuity from single‐spacecraft measurements of plasma velocity and density: Minimum mass flux residue , 2004 .

[12]  D. Baker,et al.  Analyses on the geometrical structure of magnetic field in the current sheet based on cluster measurements , 2003 .

[13]  K. Glassmeier,et al.  Four‐point Cluster application of magnetic field analysis tools: The discontinuity analyzer , 2002 .

[14]  A. Khrabrov,et al.  Orientation and motion of current layers: minimization of the Faraday residue , 1998 .

[15]  A. Khrabrov,et al.  Error estimates for minimum variance analysis , 1998 .

[16]  A. Khrabrov,et al.  DeHoffmann-Teller Analysis , 1998 .

[17]  B. Sonnerup,et al.  Minimum and Maximum Variance Analysis , 1998 .

[18]  T. Higuchi,et al.  A generalization of the minimum variance analysis method , 1996 .

[19]  Hideaki Kawano,et al.  On the Determination of a Moving MHD Structure: Minimization of the Residue of Integrated Faraday's Equation , 1996 .

[20]  I. Papamastorakis,et al.  Magnetopause properties from AMPTE/IRM observations of the convection electric field: Method development , 1987 .

[21]  J. Scudder,et al.  Fast and optimal solution to the 'Rankine-Hugoniot problem'. [for geometrical shock wave properties, conservation constants and self-consistent asymptotic magnetofluid variables of interplanetary medium] , 1986 .

[22]  N. Maynard,et al.  Electric field measurements at the magnetopause: 1. Observation of large convective velocities at rotational magnetopause discontinuities , 1983 .

[23]  B. Sonnerup,et al.  Ogo 5 magnetopause structure and classical reconnection , 1979 .

[24]  P. Argentiero,et al.  Single spacecraft method of estimating shock normals , 1971 .

[25]  L. J. Cahill,et al.  Magnetopause structure and attitude from Explorer 12 observations. , 1967 .