Adaptive Edge Analytics for Distributed Networked Control of Water Systems

Over the last decade, there has been a trend where water utility companies aim to make water distribution networks more intelligent in order to improve their quality of service, reduce water waste, minimize maintenance costs etc., by incorporating IoT technologies. Current state of the art solutions use expensive power hungry deployments to monitor and transmit water network states periodically in order to detect anomalous behaviors such as water leakage and bursts. However, more than 97% of water network assets are remote away from power and are often in geographically remote underpopulated areas, facts that make current approaches unsuitable for next generation more dynamic adaptive water networks. Battery-driven wireless sensor/actuator based solutions are theoretically the perfect choice to support next generation water distribution. In this paper, we present an end-to-end water leak localization system, which exploits edge processing and enables the use of battery-driven sensor nodes. Our system combines a lightweight edge anomaly detection algorithm based on compression rates and an efficient localization algorithm based on graph theory. The edge anomaly detection and localization elements of the systems produce a timely and accurate localization result and reduce the communication by 99% compared to the traditional periodic communication. We evaluated our schemes by deploying non-intrusive sensors measuring vibrational data on a real-world water test rig that have had controlled leakage and burst scenarios implemented.

[1]  Babak Aghaei,et al.  Using wireless sensor network in water, electricity and gas industry , 2011, 2011 3rd International Conference on Electronics Computer Technology.

[2]  Gerhard Geiger,et al.  State-of-the-Art in Leak Detection and Localisation , 2006 .

[3]  Julie A. McCann,et al.  High Quality Graph-Based Similarity Search , 2015, SIGIR.

[4]  Mohamed F. Younis,et al.  A sensor network for non-intrusive and efficient leak detection in long pipelines , 2011, 2011 IFIP Wireless Days (WD).

[5]  L. Nachman,et al.  PIPENET: A Wireless Sensor Network for Pipeline Monitoring , 2007, 2007 6th International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks.

[6]  Julie A. McCann,et al.  Efficient Partial-Pairs SimRank Search for Large Networks , 2015, Proc. VLDB Endow..

[7]  Julie A. McCann,et al.  Co-Simmate: Quick Retrieving All Pairwise Co-Simrank Scores , 2015, ACL.

[8]  Mudasser Iqbal,et al.  Wavelet-based Burst Event Detection and Localization in Water Distribution Systems , 2013, J. Signal Process. Syst..

[9]  G. Olsson,et al.  Burst detection and location in water distribution networks , 2005 .

[10]  Julie A. McCann,et al.  Real-time Edge Analytics for Cyber Physical Systems using Compression Rates , 2014, ICAC.

[11]  A. C. Radder,et al.  On the parabolic equation method for water-wave propagation , 1978, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[12]  Marcus Filtering Sensor Data with a Kalman Filter , 2009 .

[13]  Mudasser Iqbal,et al.  Water Distribution System Monitoring and Decision Support Using a Wireless Sensor Network , 2013, 2013 14th ACIS International Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing.

[14]  Burr Settles,et al.  Active Learning Literature Survey , 2009 .

[15]  Francesco Archetti,et al.  Analytical Leakages Localization in Water Distribution Networks through Spectral Clustering and Support Vector MACHINES. The Icewater Approach , 2014 .

[16]  Manuel Mazo,et al.  On event-triggered and self-triggered control over sensor/actuator networks , 2008, 2008 47th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[17]  Wei Debao Remote Water Quality Monitoring System Based on WSN and GPRS , 2010 .

[18]  R. Olfati-Saber,et al.  Distributed Kalman Filter with Embedded Consensus Filters , 2005, Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[19]  J. Shaffer Multiple Hypothesis Testing , 1995 .