Using Interactive Data Visualizations for Exploratory Analysis in Undergraduate Genomics Coursework: Field Study Findings and Guidelines

Life scientists increasingly use visual analytics to explore large data sets and generate hypotheses. Undergraduate biology majors should be learning these same methods. Yet visual analytics is one of the most underdeveloped areas of undergraduate biology education. This study sought to determine the feasibility of undergraduate biology majors conducting exploratory analysis using the same interactive data visualizations as practicing scientists. We examined 22 upper level undergraduates in a genomics course as they engaged in a case-based inquiry with an interactive heat map. We qualitatively and quantitatively analyzed students’ visual analytic behaviors, reasoning and outcomes to identify student performance patterns, commonly shared efficiencies and task completion. We analyzed students’ successes and difficulties in applying knowledge and skills relevant to the visual analytics case and related gaps in knowledge and skill to associated tool designs. Findings show that undergraduate engagement in visual analytics is feasible and could be further strengthened through tool usability improvements. We identify these improvements. We speculate, as well, on instructional considerations that our findings suggested may also enhance visual analytics in case-based modules.

[1]  Jonathan I. Flombaum,et al.  Two Items Remembered as Precisely as One , 2013, Psychological science.

[2]  Penny Rheingans,et al.  NIH-NSF visualization research challenges report summary , 2006, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[3]  Tomasz G. Smolinski Computer Literacy for Life Sciences: Helping the Digital-Era Biology Undergraduates Face Today's Research , 2010, CBE life sciences education.

[4]  John T. Stasko,et al.  Distributed Cognition as a Theoretical Framework for Information Visualization , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[5]  Chris North,et al.  An insight-based methodology for evaluating bioinformatics visualizations , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[6]  Migdalisel Colon-Berlingeri,et al.  Teaching Biology through Statistics: Application of Statistical Methods in Genetics and Zoology Courses , 2011, CBE life sciences education.

[7]  Kathleen Hogan Exploring a process view of students' knowledge about the nature of science , 2000 .

[8]  Nilli Lavie,et al.  Selective attention and cognitive control: dissociating attentional functions through different types of load , 1998 .

[9]  Ben Kelcey,et al.  How and when does complex reasoning occur? Empirically driven development of a learning progression focused on complex reasoning about biodiversity , 2009 .

[10]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research , 2006 .

[11]  Stephen H Wefer,et al.  Bioinformatics in high school biology curricula: a study of state science standards. , 2008, CBE life sciences education.

[12]  Mary Lee S. Ledbetter,et al.  Vision and Change in Undergraduate Biology Education: A Call to Action Presentation to Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience, July 2011 , 2012, Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience.

[13]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Integrating statistics and visualization: case studies of gaining clarity during exploratory data analysis , 2008, CHI.

[14]  Charles Goodwin,et al.  The Blackness of Black: Color Categories as Situated Practice , 1997 .

[15]  Dalit Levy,et al.  How Dynamic Visualization Technology can Support Molecular Reasoning , 2012, Journal of Science Education and Technology.

[16]  Paul J. Feltovich,et al.  Cognitive Flexibility, Constructivism, and Hypertext: Random Access Instruction for Advanced Knowledge Acquisition in Ill-Structured Domains , 2012 .

[17]  Gang Su,et al.  Omics Data Exploration: Across Scales and Dimensions. , 2013 .

[18]  Division on Earth BIO2010: Transforming Undergraduate Education for Future Research Biologists , 2003 .

[19]  Paul M Bays,et al.  Obligatory encoding of task-irrelevant features depletes working memory resources. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[20]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Computer visualizations: Factors that influence spatial anatomy comprehension , 2012, Anatomical sciences education.

[21]  Chris North,et al.  Visualizing Biological Pathways: Requirements Analysis, Systems Evaluation and Research Agenda , 2005, Inf. Vis..

[22]  Yudong D. He,et al.  Functional Discovery via a Compendium of Expression Profiles , 2000, Cell.

[23]  J. Driver,et al.  Control of Cognitive Processes: Attention and Performance XVIII , 2000 .

[24]  Daniel A. Keim,et al.  Mastering the Information Age - Solving Problems with Visual Analytics , 2010 .

[25]  Julie C. Libarkin,et al.  The Status of Genetics Curriculum in Higher Education in the United States: Goals and Assessment , 2014 .

[26]  Ralph Lengler Identifying the Competencies of 'Visual Literacy' - a Prerequisite for Knowledge Visualization , 2006, Tenth International Conference on Information Visualisation (IV'06).

[27]  Charles Hohensee,et al.  “Noticing” as an Alternative Transfer of Learning Process , 2012 .

[28]  Troy D. Sadler,et al.  Scientific Research for Undergraduate Students: A Review of the Literature. , 2010 .

[29]  Justin Riley,et al.  Bringing Research Tools Into the Classroom , 2008 .

[30]  William Ribarsky,et al.  A two-stage framework for designing visual analytics system in organizational environments , 2011, 2011 IEEE Conference on Visual Analytics Science and Technology (VAST).

[31]  Keith A. Nabb,et al.  A Theoretical and Empirical Exploration of Intrinsic Problems in Designing Inquiry Activities , 2013 .

[32]  Chris R. Johnson,et al.  NHI-NSF Visualization Research Challenges Report , 2005 .

[33]  Matthew A. Hibbs,et al.  Visualization of omics data for systems biology , 2010, Nature Methods.

[34]  Anuj Kumar Teaching systems biology: an active-learning approach. , 2005, Cell biology education.

[35]  Susan R. Singer,et al.  Discipline-Based Education Research: Understanding and Improving Learning in Undergraduate Science and Engineering. , 2012 .

[36]  Jean Scholtz,et al.  Developing guidelines for assessing visual analytics environments , 2011, Inf. Vis..

[37]  Christine L. Moskalik,et al.  Development and Evaluation of a Genetics Literacy Assessment Instrument for Undergraduates , 2008, Genetics.

[38]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  A Scaffolding Design Framework for Software to Support Science Inquiry , 2004, The Journal of the Learning Sciences.

[39]  Silvia Wen-Yu Technology-supported Learning in Secondary and Undergraduate Biological Education: Observations from Literature Review , 2013 .

[40]  Alison Crowe,et al.  Biology in bloom: implementing Bloom's Taxonomy to enhance student learning in biology. , 2008, CBE life sciences education.

[41]  Sharon Oviatt,et al.  Toward High-Performance Communications Interfaces for Science Problem Solving , 2010 .

[42]  Vanessa L. Peters,et al.  Evaluating the Usability of a Professional Modeling Tool Repurposed for Middle School Learning , 2013 .

[43]  P. Lemons,et al.  Questions for Assessing Higher-Order Cognitive Skills: It's Not Just Bloom’s , 2013, CBE life sciences education.

[44]  Caleb Trujillo,et al.  Using graph‐based assessments within socratic tutorials to reveal and refine students' analytical thinking about molecular networks , 2012, Biochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.