Asynchronous bio-inspired tuning for the DC motor speed controller with simultaneous identification and predictive strategies

One of the main issues in the control system is the online tuning of its gains. The use of bio-inspired algorithms (BA) is gaining more attention in the control tuning task because they are less sensible to system uncertainties. Nevertheless, the computational time of BA must be reduced to be used in practice. In this work, an event condition is stated to reduce the computational cost of the optimization process in the online bio-inspired tuning approach. This condition activates the tuning approach only when it is required, i.e., when the regulation error tends to increase. Also, in this approach, an identification process and a predictive strategy are simultaneously optimized to find the more suitable control parameters that handle more efficient the parametric uncertainties. The proposed online Asynchronous Bio-inspired Tuning Approach with Simultaneous Identification and Prediction (ABioTASIP) is validated in the study case of the velocity regulation of a DC motor considering dynamic parametric uncertainties. The comparative analysis with an approach where the control parameters are periodically tuned indicates that the proposal decreases the tuning process without considerably increase the regulation error.

[1]  A. E. Ruano,et al.  Intelligent control - the road ahead , 2007, 2007 European Control Conference (ECC).

[2]  Weiping Li,et al.  Applied Nonlinear Control , 1991 .

[3]  Miguel G Villarreal-Cervantes,et al.  Adaptive Controller Tuning Method Based on Online Multiobjective Optimization: A Case Study of the Four-Bar Mechanism , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics.

[4]  Jaime Álvarez-Gallegos,et al.  Bio-inspired adaptive control strategy for the highly efficient speed regulation of the DC motor under parametric uncertainty , 2019, Appl. Soft Comput..

[5]  Leticia Amador-Angulo,et al.  A new fuzzy bee colony optimization with dynamic adaptation of parameters using interval type-2 fuzzy logic for tuning fuzzy controllers , 2016, Soft Computing.

[6]  Gilberto Reynoso-Meza,et al.  Algoritmos Evolutivos y su empleo en el ajuste de controladores del tipo PID: Estado Actual y Perspectivas , 2013 .

[7]  S. G. Tzafestas,et al.  Controller tuning with evolutionary multiobjective optimization , 2017 .

[8]  John Chiasson,et al.  Modeling and High Performance Control of Electric Machines , 2005 .

[9]  Richard M. Murray,et al.  Feedback Systems An Introduction for Scientists and Engineers , 2007 .

[10]  Igor Skrjanc,et al.  Interval-model-based global optimization framework for robust stability and performance of PID controllers , 2016, Appl. Soft Comput..

[11]  Xiaojun Zhou,et al.  Set-Point Tracking and Multi-Objective Optimization-Based PID Control for the Goethite Process , 2018, IEEE Access.

[12]  Nicolas Marchand,et al.  A General Formula for Event-Based Stabilization of Nonlinear Systems , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[13]  Ana Susperregui,et al.  Multi-Objective Optimisation-Based Tuning of Two Second-Order Sliding-Mode Controller Variants for DFIGs Connected to Non-Ideal Grid Voltage , 2019, Energies.

[14]  Jaime Álvarez-Gallegos,et al.  Off-line PID control tuning for a planar parallel robot using DE variants , 2016, Expert Syst. Appl..

[15]  Chu Zhang,et al.  Multiobjective Optimization of a Fractional-Order PID Controller for Pumped Turbine Governing System Using an Improved NSGA-III Algorithm under Multiworking Conditions , 2019, Complex..

[16]  Xu Zhou,et al.  Multi-objective-optimization-based control parameters auto-tuning for aerial manipulators , 2019, International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems.

[17]  R. Krishnan,et al.  Electric Motor Drives: Modeling, Analysis, and Control , 2001 .

[18]  Oscar Castillo,et al.  Parameter Optimization for Membership Functions of Type-2 Fuzzy Controllers for Autonomous Mobile Robots Using the Firefly Algorithm , 2018, NAFIPS.

[19]  A. S. Oshaba,et al.  ACO based speed control of SRM fed by photovoltaic system , 2015 .

[20]  O. Tolga Altinoz,et al.  Optimal Controller Parameter Tuning from Multi/Many-objective Optimization Algorithms , 2019, Computational Intelligence and Optimization Methods for Control Engineering.

[21]  Miguel G. Villarreal-Cervantes,et al.  Multi-objective meta-heuristic optimization in intelligent control: A survey on the controller tuning problem , 2020, Appl. Soft Comput..

[22]  J. G. Ziegler,et al.  Optimum Settings for Automatic Controllers , 1942, Journal of Fluids Engineering.

[23]  Donald A. Pierre,et al.  Digital controller design — Alternative emulation approaches , 1995 .

[24]  Iztok Fister,et al.  Online Adaptive Controller Based on Dynamic Evolution Strategies , 2018, Applied Sciences.

[25]  R. Storn,et al.  Differential Evolution: A Practical Approach to Global Optimization (Natural Computing Series) , 2005 .

[26]  Xavier Blasco Ferragud,et al.  Enhancing controller's tuning reliability with multi-objective optimisation: From Model in the loop to Hardware in the loop , 2017, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[27]  Shahryar Rahnamayan,et al.  Enhancing LQR Controller Using Optimized Real-time System by GDE3 and NSGA-II Algorithms and Comparing with Conventional Method , 2019, 2019 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC).

[28]  Ehab S. Ali,et al.  Speed control of induction motor supplied by wind turbine via Imperialist Competitive Algorithm , 2015 .

[29]  Youguo Pi,et al.  Study of the fractional order proportional integral controller for the permanent magnet synchronous motor based on the differential evolution algorithm. , 2016, ISA transactions.

[30]  Miguel G Villarreal-Cervantes,et al.  Periodic Event-Triggered Control strategy for a (3,0) mobile robot network. , 2019, ISA transactions.

[31]  Miguel Gabriel Villarreal-Cervantes,et al.  An adaptive control study for the DC motor using meta-heuristic algorithms , 2019, Soft Comput..