Extending Rigor and Relevance: Towards Credible, Contributory and Communicable Research

There are many ways to discuss research quality. This paper aims at presenting an actionable framework for research quality, which can be used as guiding principles for identifying important dimensions when evaluating research. The framework takes its starting point in prior suggestions that research should be rigorous, relevant and consumable. When examining the rigor aspect it is argued that this is a means rather than an end. By being rigorous, research strives to be credible. This also calls for consistency and transparency. Similarly, it is argued that relevance is a means for research to be contributory. To be contributory research also has to be original and generalizable. Research has to be consumable in order to be communicable, but to become a consumed piece of research it must also be accessible. Starting out with the agenda of discussing research being rigorous, relevant and consumable, the paper instead ends up with a call for research being credible, contributory and communicable. By using the dimensions presented in the paper, researchers may increase the quality of research efforts both in research design, as well as research execution and research presentation.

[1]  M. D. Shipman,et al.  The limitations of social research , 1972 .

[2]  Herbert Snyder,et al.  Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data , 1996 .

[3]  P. Brink.  On reliability and validity in qualitative research. , 1987, Western journal of nursing research.

[4]  H. Klein,et al.  Information systems research: contemporary approaches and emergent traditions , 1991 .

[5]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Beyond Rigor and Relevance Towards Responsibility and Reverberation: Information Systems Research That Really Matters , 2006, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[6]  Leyland F. Pitt,et al.  Potential Research Space in MIS: A Framework for Envisioning and Evaluating Research Replication, Extension, and Generation , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[7]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Generalizing Generalizability in Information Systems Research , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[8]  Edward Toomer,et al.  Qualitative Methods in Management Research , 1989 .

[9]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Beyond Rigor and Relevance: Producing Consumable Research about Information Systems , 1998 .

[10]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Research Commentary: Rethinking "Diversity" in Information Systems Research , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[11]  P. Berger,et al.  The Social Construction of Reality , 1966 .

[12]  A. Mårtensson.  Managing mission-critical IT in the financial industry , 2003 .

[13]  J. Morse.  Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed): Mathew B. Miles and A. Michael Huberman. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1994. Price: $65.00 hardback, $32.00 paperback. 238 pp , 1996 .

[14]  Joseph A. Maxwell,et al.  Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach , 1996 .

[15]  J. Morse.  Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analysing talk, text and interaction , 1996 .

[16]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..

[17]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Empirical Research in Information Systems: The Practice of Relevance , 1999, MIS Q..

[18]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[19]  K. Weick.  The social psychology of organizing , 1969 .

[20]  Allen S. Lee.  Integrating Positivist and Interpretive Approaches to Organizational Research , 1991 .

[21]  Line Dubé,et al.  Rigor in Information Systems Positivist Case Research: Current Practices , 2003, MIS Q..