Remote sensing from unoccupied aerial systems: Opportunities to enhance Arctic plant ecology in a changing climate

The Arctic is warming at a faster rate than any other biome on Earth, resulting in widespread changes in vegetation composition, structure and function that have important feedbacks to the global climate system. The heterogeneous nature of arctic landscapes creates challenges for monitoring and improving understanding of these ecosystems, as current efforts typically rely on ground, airborne or satellite‐based observations that are limited in space, time or pixel resolution. The use of remote sensing instruments on small unoccupied aerial systems (UASs) has emerged as an important tool to bridge the gap between detailed, but spatially limited ground‐level measurements, and lower resolution, but spatially extensive high‐altitude airborne and satellite observations. UASs allow researchers to view, describe and quantify vegetation dynamics at fine spatial scales (1–10 cm) over areas much larger than typical field plots. UASs can be deployed with a high degree of temporal flexibility, enabling observation across diurnal, seasonal and annual time‐scales. Here we review how established and emerging UAS remote sensing technologies can enhance arctic plant ecological research by quantifying fine‐scale vegetation patterns and processes, and by enhancing the ability to link ground‐based measurements with broader‐scale information obtained from airborne and satellite platforms. Synthesis. Improved ecological understanding and model representation of arctic vegetation is needed to forecast the fate of the Arctic in a rapidly changing climate. Observations from UASs provide an approach to address this need, however, the use of this technology in the Arctic currently remains limited. Here we share recommendations to better enable and encourage the use of UASs to improve the description, scaling and model representation of arctic vegetation.

[1]  S. M. Escarzaga,et al.  Global application of an unoccupied aerial vehicle photogrammetry protocol for predicting aboveground biomass in non‐forest ecosystems , 2021, Remote sensing in ecology and conservation.

[2]  Sergio A. Vargas Zesati,et al.  Remote Sensing of Tundra Ecosystems Using High Spectral Resolution Reflectance: Opportunities and Challenges , 2021, Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences.

[3]  A. Rogers,et al.  Reducing model uncertainty of climate change impacts on high latitude carbon assimilation , 2021, Global change biology.

[4]  M. Siewert,et al.  UAV reveals substantial but heterogeneous effects of herbivores on Arctic vegetation , 2021, Scientific Reports.

[5]  G. Gunn,et al.  Unpiloted Aerial Vehicle Retrieval of Snow Depth Over Freshwater Lake Ice Using Structure From Motion , 2021, Frontiers in Remote Sensing.

[6]  Jing Li,et al.  Spectroscopy outperforms leaf trait relationships for predicting photosynthetic capacity across different forest types. , 2021, The New phytologist.

[7]  B. D. Morrison,et al.  A best-practice guide to predicting plant traits from leaf-level hyperspectral data using partial least squares regression. , 2021, Journal of experimental botany.

[8]  Anne D. Bjorkman,et al.  Experimental warming differentially affects vegetative and reproductive phenology of tundra plants , 2021, Nature Communications.

[9]  Roberta E. Martin,et al.  NASA's surface biology and geology designated observable: A perspective on surface imaging algorithms , 2021 .

[10]  M. Mack,et al.  Arctic tundra shrubification: a review of mechanisms and impacts on ecosystem carbon balance , 2021, Environmental Research Letters.

[11]  B. Enquist,et al.  Multiscale mapping of plant functional groups and plant traits in the High Arctic using field spectroscopy, UAV imagery and Sentinel-2A data , 2021, Environmental Research Letters.

[12]  Daniel J. Hayes,et al.  Predicting Water Stress in Wild Blueberry Fields Using Airborne Visible and Near Infrared Imaging Spectroscopy , 2021, Remote. Sens..

[13]  Jan G. P. W. Clevers,et al.  Diurnal variation of sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence of agricultural crops observed from a point-based spectrometer on a UAV , 2021, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[14]  Mercedes Vélez-Nicolás,et al.  Applications of Unmanned Aerial Systems (UASs) in Hydrology: A Review , 2021, Remote. Sens..

[15]  A. Matese,et al.  Recent Advances in Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Forest Remote Sensing—A Systematic Review. Part II: Research Applications , 2021, Forests.

[16]  A. Matese,et al.  Recent Advances in Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Forest Remote Sensing—A Systematic Review. Part I: A General Framework , 2021, Forests.

[17]  Daniel M. Griffith,et al.  Imaging canopy temperature: shedding (thermal) light on ecosystem processes. , 2021, The New phytologist.

[18]  Innovations to expand drone data collection and analysis for rangeland monitoring , 2021 .

[19]  B. D. Morrison,et al.  Landscape-scale characterization of Arctic tundra vegetation composition, structure, and function with a multi-sensor unoccupied aerial system , 2021, Environmental Research Letters.

[20]  Hector Nieto,et al.  High Spatial and Temporal Resolution Energy Flux Mapping of Different Land Covers Using an Off-the-Shelf Unmanned Aerial System , 2021, Remote. Sens..

[21]  Jordi Cristóbal,et al.  Airborne Hyperspectral Data Acquisition and Processing in the Arctic: A Pilot Study Using the Hyspex Imaging Spectrometer for Wetland Mapping , 2021, Remote. Sens..

[22]  J. Greenberg,et al.  Impacts of Arctic Shrubs on Root Traits and Belowground Nutrient Cycles Across a Northern Alaskan Climate Gradient , 2020, Frontiers in Plant Science.

[23]  C. Andresen,et al.  UAS LIDAR MAPPING OF AN ARCTIC TUNDRA WATERSHED: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES , 2020 .

[24]  L. Gu,et al.  An Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) for concurrent measurements of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence and hyperspectral reflectance toward improving crop monitoring , 2020 .

[25]  Jianqing Ding,et al.  Plant Chemistry Determines Host Preference and Performance of an Invasive Insect , 2020, Frontiers in Plant Science.

[26]  Matthew Maimaitiyiming,et al.  Leveraging Very-High Spatial Resolution Hyperspectral and Thermal UAV Imageries for Characterizing Diurnal Indicators of Grapevine Physiology , 2020, Remote. Sens..

[27]  H. Genet,et al.  Local-scale Arctic tundra heterogeneity affects regional-scale carbon dynamics , 2020, Nature Communications.

[28]  Eoin L. Brodie,et al.  Integrating airborne remote sensing and field campaigns for ecology and Earth system science , 2020, Methods in Ecology and Evolution.

[29]  M. Raynolds,et al.  Recent trends and remaining challenges for optical remote sensing of Arctic tundra vegetation: A review and outlook , 2020 .

[30]  Shawn P. Serbin,et al.  A Multi-Sensor Unoccupied Aerial System Improves Characterization of Vegetation Composition and Canopy Properties in the Arctic Tundra , 2020, Remote. Sens..

[31]  Douglas C. Morton,et al.  Mapping tall shrub biomass in Alaska at landscape scale using structure-from-motion photogrammetry and lidar , 2020 .

[32]  Andrew M. Cunliffe,et al.  Drone data reveal heterogeneity in tundra greenness and phenology not captured by satellites , 2020, Environmental Research Letters.

[33]  Andrew M. Cunliffe,et al.  Aboveground biomass corresponds strongly with drone-derived canopy height but weakly with greenness (NDVI) in a shrub tundra landscape , 2020, Environmental Research Letters.

[34]  Takashi Asawa,et al.  Narrow-to-Broadband Conversion for Albedo Estimation on Urban Surfaces by UAV-Based Multispectral Camera , 2020, Remote. Sens..

[35]  M. Siewert,et al.  Scale-dependency of Arctic ecosystem properties revealed by UAV , 2020, Environmental Research Letters.

[36]  Philip A. Townsend,et al.  Remote Sensing of Plant Biodiversity , 2020 .

[37]  P. Townsend,et al.  Foliar functional traits from imaging spectroscopy across biomes in eastern North America. , 2020, The New phytologist.

[38]  A. Knohl,et al.  Predicting evapotranspiration from drone-based thermography – a method comparison in a tropical oil palm plantation , 2020, Biogeosciences.

[39]  Giuseppe Modica,et al.  Applications of UAV Thermal Imagery in Precision Agriculture: State of the Art and Future Research Outlook , 2020, Remote. Sens..

[40]  J. Dozier,et al.  Driving forces of land surface temperature anomalous changes in North America in 2002–2018 , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[41]  S. Goetz,et al.  Lichen cover mapping for caribou ranges in interior Alaska and Yukon , 2020, Environmental Research Letters.

[42]  G. Katul,et al.  The Duality of Reforestation Impacts on Surface and Air Temperature , 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences.

[43]  Anshuman Bhardwaj,et al.  Applications of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in Cryosphere: Latest Advances and Prospects , 2020, Remote. Sens..

[44]  Christopher Y. S. Wong,et al.  High-throughput drone based remote sensing reliably tracks phenology in thousands of conifer seedlings. , 2020, The New phytologist.

[45]  L. Xiong,et al.  Reforestation and surface cooling in temperate zones: Mechanisms and implications , 2020, Global change biology.

[46]  Anne D. Bjorkman,et al.  Complexity revealed in the greening of the Arctic , 2019, Nature Climate Change.

[47]  Jeannine Cavender-Bares,et al.  Consideration of Scale in Remote Sensing of Biodiversity , 2020, Remote Sensing of Plant Biodiversity.

[48]  A. Schweiger Spectral Field Campaigns: Planning and Data Collection , 2020, Remote Sensing of Plant Biodiversity.

[49]  R. Fraser,et al.  Testing the potential of UAV photogrammetry for deriving bare earth models in Arctic shrublands , 2020 .

[50]  S. Juutinen,et al.  Detecting northern peatland vegetation patterns at ultra‐high spatial resolution , 2019, Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation.

[51]  C. Bay,et al.  Non-native vascular flora of the Arctic: Taxonomic richness, distribution and pathways , 2019, Ambio.

[52]  Kim S. Ely,et al.  From the Arctic to the tropics: multi-biome prediction of leaf mass per area using leaf reflectance. , 2019, The New phytologist.

[53]  S. Hubbard,et al.  A distributed temperature profiling method for assessing spatial variability in ground temperatures in a discontinuous permafrost region of Alaska , 2019, The Cryosphere.

[54]  J. Eitel,et al.  20 cm resolution mapping of tundra vegetation communities provides an ecological baseline for important research areas in a changing Arctic environment , 2019, Environmental Research Communications.

[55]  J. Gamon,et al.  Remote sensing of terrestrial plant biodiversity , 2019, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[56]  Jeffrey K. Gillan,et al.  Estimating Forage Utilization with Drone-Based Photogrammetric Point Clouds , 2019, Rangeland Ecology & Management.

[57]  Xiaoyu Chen,et al.  Unmanned Aerial Vehicle for Remote Sensing Applications - A Review , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[58]  Rabi N. Sahoo,et al.  Application of thermal imaging and hyperspectral remote sensing for crop water deficit stress monitoring , 2019, Geocarto International.

[59]  D. Roberts,et al.  Thermal imaging in plant and ecosystem ecology: applications and challenges , 2019, Ecosphere.

[60]  Jens Klump,et al.  Emergent Challenges for Science sUAS Data Management: Fairness through Community Engagement and Best Practices Development , 2019 .

[61]  Andrew Fox,et al.  Enhancing global change experiments through integration of remote‐sensing techniques , 2019, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment.

[62]  Guido Grosse,et al.  Permafrost collapse is accelerating carbon release , 2019, Nature.

[63]  Miska Luoto,et al.  Estimating fractional cover of tundra vegetation at multiple scales using unmanned aerial systems and optical satellite data , 2019, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[64]  Kim S. Ely,et al.  Terrestrial biosphere models may overestimate Arctic CO2 assimilation if they do not account for decreased quantum yield and convexity at low temperature. , 2019, The New phytologist.

[65]  S. Leblanc,et al.  A UAV-Based Sensor System for Measuring Land Surface Albedo: Tested over a Boreal Peatland Ecosystem , 2019, Drones.

[66]  M. E. Schaepman,et al.  Assessing Vegetation Function with Imaging Spectroscopy , 2019, Surveys in Geophysics.

[67]  Philip A. Townsend,et al.  Mapping foliar functional traits and their uncertainties across three years in a grassland experiment , 2019, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[68]  Anne D. Bjorkman,et al.  Plant traits inform predictions of tundra responses to global change. , 2018, The New phytologist.

[69]  Anne D. Bjorkman,et al.  Warming shortens flowering seasons of tundra plant communities , 2018, Nature Ecology & Evolution.

[70]  Xianglan Li,et al.  Limitations and Challenges of MODIS-Derived Phenological Metrics Across Different Landscapes in Pan-Arctic Regions , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[71]  T. Vowles,et al.  Implications of evergreen shrub expansion in the Arctic , 2018, Journal of Ecology.

[72]  Zhiwei Xu,et al.  High-resolution miniature UAV SAR imaging based on GPU Architecture , 2018 .

[73]  John R. Jensen,et al.  Small Unmanned Aerial Systems (sUAS) for environmental remote sensing: challenges and opportunities revisited , 2018, GIScience & Remote Sensing.

[74]  N. Pettorelli,et al.  Measuring β‐diversity by remote sensing: A challenge for biodiversity monitoring , 2018, Methods in Ecology and Evolution.

[75]  J. Mao,et al.  Self‐Amplifying Feedbacks Accelerate Greening and Warming of the Arctic , 2018, Geophysical Research Letters.

[76]  Ziad A. Alqadi,et al.  Salt and Pepper Noise: Effects and Removal , 2018, JOIV : International Journal on Informatics Visualization.

[77]  Christopher B Anderson,et al.  Biodiversity monitoring, earth observations and the ecology of scale. , 2018, Ecology letters.

[78]  Maja K. Sundqvist,et al.  Patchy field sampling biases understanding of climate change impacts across the Arctic , 2018, Nature Ecology & Evolution.

[79]  Ben Somers,et al.  LiDAR derived forest structure data improves predictions of canopy N and P concentrations from imaging spectroscopy , 2018, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[80]  Isla H Myers-Smith,et al.  Vegetation monitoring using multispectral sensors – best practices and lessons learned from high latitudes , 2018, bioRxiv.

[81]  D. Tilman,et al.  Plant spectral diversity integrates functional and phylogenetic components of biodiversity and predicts ecosystem function , 2018, Nature Ecology & Evolution.

[82]  Eija Honkavaara,et al.  Direct Reflectance Measurements from Drones: Sensor Absolute Radiometric Calibration and System Tests for Forest Reflectance Characterization , 2018, Sensors.

[83]  D. Lawrence,et al.  Dependence of the evolution of carbon dynamics in the northern permafrost region on the trajectory of climate change , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[84]  D. Morton,et al.  Quantifying Boreal Forest Structure and Composition Using UAV Structure from Motion , 2018 .

[85]  Craig E. Tweedie,et al.  Climate and nutrient effects on Arctic wetland plant phenology observed from phenocams , 2018 .

[86]  Benjamin Smith,et al.  Vegetation demographics in Earth System Models: A review of progress and priorities , 2018, Global change biology.

[87]  J. DelGreco FOUR YEARS OF UNMANNED AERIAL SYSTEM IMAGERY REVEALS VEGETATION CHANGE IN A SUB-ARCTIC MIRE DUE TO PERMAFROST THAW , 2018 .

[88]  Andres Kuusk,et al.  Canopy Radiative Transfer Modeling , 2018 .

[89]  Gerald V. Frost,et al.  Seasonal and Long-Term Changes to Active-Layer Temperatures after Tall Shrubland Expansion and Succession in Arctic Tundra , 2018, Ecosystems.

[90]  S. Goetz,et al.  Tundra plant above-ground biomass and shrub dominance mapped across the North Slope of Alaska , 2018 .

[91]  Zong-Liang Yang,et al.  Missing pieces to modeling the Arctic-Boreal puzzle , 2018 .

[92]  Johanna D. Turnbull,et al.  Unmanned aircraft system advances health mapping of fragile polar vegetation , 2017 .

[93]  A. Ghulam,et al.  Unmanned Aerial System (UAS)-Based Phenotyping of Soybean using Multi-sensor Data Fusion and Extreme Learning Machine , 2017 .

[94]  Kim S. Ely,et al.  Terrestrial biosphere models underestimate photosynthetic capacity and CO2 assimilation in the Arctic. , 2017, The New phytologist.

[95]  K. Sudhakar,et al.  Modeling and performance simulation of 100 MW LFR based solar thermal power plant in Udaipur India , 2017, Resource-Efficient Technologies.

[96]  Higinio González-Jorge,et al.  Unmanned Aerial Systems for Civil Applications: A Review , 2017 .

[97]  Michael E. Schaepman,et al.  Drivers of shortwave radiation fluxes in Arctic tundra across scales , 2017 .

[98]  Kristine F. Stepenuck,et al.  Citizen science can improve conservation science, natural resource management, and environmental protection , 2017 .

[99]  Adrian A. Harpold,et al.  Topographically driven differences in energy and water constrain climatic control on forest carbon sequestration , 2017 .

[100]  C. Tucker,et al.  Changing seasonality of panarctic tundra vegetation in relationship to climatic variables , 2017 .

[101]  Donatella Zona,et al.  Numerical Terradynamic Simulation Group 11-2016 Mapping Arctic Tundra Vegetation Communities Using Field Spectroscopy and Multispectral Satellite Data in North Alaska , USA , 2017 .

[102]  J. Eitel,et al.  Scaling Thermal Properties from the Leaf to the Canopy in the Alaskan Arctic Tundra , 2016, Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research.

[103]  M. Torre Jorgenson,et al.  Scaling-up permafrost thermal measurements in western Alaska using an ecotype approach , 2016 .

[104]  Philip A. Townsend,et al.  Quantifying the influences of spectral resolution on uncertainty in leaf trait estimates through a Bayesian approach to RTM inversion , 2016 .

[105]  R. Fraser,et al.  UAV photogrammetry for mapping vegetation in the low-Arctic , 2016 .

[106]  J. Masek,et al.  The vegetation greenness trend in Canada and US Alaska from 1984–2012 Landsat data , 2016 .

[107]  L. Mommer,et al.  Seasonal changes and vertical distribution of root standing biomass of graminoids and shrubs at a Siberian tundra site , 2016, Plant and Soil.

[108]  L. Wallace,et al.  Assessment of Forest Structure Using Two UAV Techniques: A Comparison of Airborne Laser Scanning and Structure from Motion (SfM) Point Clouds , 2016 .

[109]  L. Hinzman,et al.  Arctic terrestrial hydrology: A synthesis of processes, regional effects, and research challenges , 2016 .

[110]  Pablo J. Zarco-Tejada,et al.  Estimating evaporation with thermal UAV data and two-source energy balance models , 2016 .

[111]  T. Loboda,et al.  Fire in arctic tundra of Alaska: past fire activity, future fire potential, and significance for land management and ecology , 2015 .

[112]  Jianwu Tang,et al.  Relationship between leaf physiologic traits and canopy color indices during the leaf expansion period in an oak forest , 2015 .

[113]  Clayton C. Kingdon,et al.  Imaging spectroscopy algorithms for mapping canopy foliar chemical and morphological traits and their uncertainties. , 2015, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[114]  Guido Grosse,et al.  Recent Arctic tundra fire initiates widespread thermokarst development , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[115]  M. Nolan,et al.  Mapping snow depth from manned aircraft on landscape scales at centimeter resolution using structure-from-motion photogrammetry , 2015 .

[116]  Terje Gobakken,et al.  Inventory of Small Forest Areas Using an Unmanned Aerial System , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[117]  John Prytherch,et al.  Warm‐air advection, air mass transformation and fog causes rapid ice melt , 2015 .

[118]  Niels Martin Schmidt,et al.  Climate sensitivity of shrub growth across the tundra biome , 2015 .

[119]  J. Eitel,et al.  Estimating aboveground biomass and leaf area of low-stature Arctic shrubs with terrestrial LiDAR , 2015 .

[120]  P. Cox,et al.  Observing terrestrial ecosystems and the carbon cycle from space , 2015, Global change biology.

[121]  S. Goetz,et al.  Biomass allometry for alder, dwarf birch, and willow in boreal forest and tundra ecosystems of far northeastern Siberia and north-central Alaska , 2015 .

[122]  Su-Jong Jeong,et al.  Arctic greening can cause earlier seasonality of Arctic amplification , 2015 .

[123]  M. Friedl,et al.  Tracking forest phenology and seasonal physiology using digital repeat photography: a critical assessment. , 2014, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[124]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  Carbon cycle uncertainty in the Alaskan Arctic , 2014 .

[125]  Eirik Malnes,et al.  Record-low primary productivity and high plant damage in the Nordic Arctic Region in 2012 caused by multiple weather events and pest outbreaks , 2014 .

[126]  M. Mack,et al.  Effects of arctic shrub expansion on biophysical vs. biogeochemical drivers of litter decomposition. , 2014, Ecology.

[127]  J. Kattge,et al.  Plant functional types in Earth system models: past experiences and future directions for application of dynamic vegetation models in high-latitude ecosystems. , 2014, Annals of botany.

[128]  I. Colomina,et al.  Unmanned aerial systems for photogrammetry and remote sensing: A review , 2014 .

[129]  G. Frost,et al.  Tall shrub and tree expansion in Siberian tundra ecotones since the 1960s , 2014, Global change biology.

[130]  Tarmo Virtanen,et al.  The fragmented nature of tundra landscape , 2014, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[131]  P. Reich The world‐wide ‘fast–slow’ plant economics spectrum: a traits manifesto , 2014 .

[132]  C. Körner,et al.  Thermal imaging reveals massive heat accumulation in flowers across a broad spectrum of alpine taxa , 2014, Alpine Botany.

[133]  Ranga B. Myneni,et al.  Use of unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) in a multi-scale vegetation index study of arctic plant communities in Adventdalen on Svalbard , 2014 .

[134]  H. Jones Plants and Microclimate: Other environmental factors: wind, altitude, climate change and atmospheric pollutants , 2013 .

[135]  M. Pierrot-Deseilligny,et al.  A Photogrammetric Workflow for the Creation of a Forest Canopy Height Model from Small Unmanned Aerial System Imagery , 2013 .

[136]  M. M. Chaves,et al.  Thermography to explore plant-environment interactions. , 2013, Journal of experimental botany.

[137]  Steven J. Phillips,et al.  Shifts in Arctic vegetation and associated feedbacks under climate change , 2013 .

[138]  Gregory Asner,et al.  Estimating Vegetation Beta Diversity from Airborne Imaging Spectroscopy and Unsupervised Clustering , 2013, Remote. Sens..

[139]  Christopher B Field,et al.  Environmental and community controls on plant canopy chemistry in a Mediterranean-type ecosystem , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[140]  Karen Anderson,et al.  Lightweight unmanned aerial vehicles will revolutionize spatial ecology , 2013 .

[141]  Lindsay A. Turnbull,et al.  Identification of 100 fundamental ecological questions , 2013 .

[142]  M. Westoby,et al.  ‘Structure-from-Motion’ photogrammetry: A low-cost, effective tool for geoscience applications , 2012 .

[143]  Claude R. Duguay,et al.  Pan-Arctic Land Surface Temperature from MODIS and AATSR: Product Development and Intercomparison , 2012, Remote. Sens..

[144]  C. Tucker,et al.  A new estimate of tundra-biome phytomass from trans-Arctic field data and AVHRR NDVI , 2012 .

[145]  Steven F. Oberbauer,et al.  Plot-scale evidence of tundra vegetation change and links to recent summer warming. , 2012 .

[146]  Arko Lucieer,et al.  An Automated Technique for Generating Georectified Mosaics from Ultra-High Resolution Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Imagery, Based on Structure from Motion (SfM) Point Clouds , 2012, Remote. Sens..

[147]  Stephan Getzin,et al.  Assessing biodiversity in forests using very high‐resolution images and unmanned aerial vehicles , 2012 .

[148]  S. Goetz,et al.  Shrub expansion in tundra ecosystems: dynamics, impacts and research priorities , 2011, Environmental Research Letters.

[149]  K. Barry,et al.  Optimizing spectral indices and chemometric analysis of leaf chemical properties using radiative transfer modeling , 2011 .

[150]  David M. Lawrence,et al.  Permafrost response to increasing Arctic shrub abundance depends on the relative influence of shrubs on local soil cooling versus large-scale climate warming , 2011 .

[151]  David L. Verbyla,et al.  Carbon loss from an unprecedented Arctic tundra wildfire , 2011, Nature.

[152]  Pol Coppin,et al.  Endmember variability in Spectral Mixture Analysis: A review , 2011 .

[153]  Jin Chen,et al.  A Quantitative Analysis of Virtual Endmembers' Increased Impact on the Collinearity Effect in Spectral Unmixing , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[154]  M. Langer,et al.  Spatial and temporal variations of summer surface temperatures of high-arctic tundra on Svalbard — Implications for MODIS LST based permafrost monitoring , 2011 .

[155]  S. Ollinger Sources of variability in canopy reflectance and the convergent properties of plants. , 2011, The New phytologist.

[156]  Robert E. Dickinson,et al.  Land surface skin temperature climatology: benefitting from the strengths of satellite observations , 2010 .

[157]  David N. Bonter,et al.  Citizen Science as an Ecological Research Tool: Challenges and Benefits , 2010 .

[158]  I. Chuine Why does phenology drive species distribution? , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[159]  Markus Neteler,et al.  Remotely sensed spectral heterogeneity as a proxy of species diversity: Recent advances and open challenges , 2010, Ecol. Informatics.

[160]  Susan L Ustin,et al.  Remote sensing of plant functional types. , 2010, The New phytologist.

[161]  G. Schaepman‐Strub,et al.  Shrub expansion may reduce summer permafrost thaw in Siberian tundra , 2010 .

[162]  Tiit Nilson,et al.  Responses of the reflectance indices PRI and NDVI to experimental warming and drought in European shrublands along a north-south climatic gradient , 2010 .

[163]  Christian Körner,et al.  Infra‐red thermometry of alpine landscapes challenges climatic warming projections , 2009 .

[164]  R. Kokaly,et al.  Characterizing canopy biochemistry from imaging spectroscopy and its application to ecosystem studies , 2009 .

[165]  W. Verhoef,et al.  PROSPECT+SAIL models: A review of use for vegetation characterization , 2009 .

[166]  G. Henebry,et al.  Remote sensing of vegetation 3-D structure for biodiversity and habitat: Review and implications for lidar and radar spaceborne missions , 2009 .

[167]  Zhao-Liang Li,et al.  Scale Issues in Remote Sensing: A Review on Analysis, Processing and Modeling , 2009, Sensors.

[168]  D. Klein,et al.  Decrease of lichens in Arctic ecosystems: the role of wildfire, caribou, reindeer, competition and climate in north-western Alaska , 2009 .

[169]  Andrew E. Suyker,et al.  Characterizing the Seasonal Dynamics of Plant Community Photosynthesis Across a Range of Vegetation Types , 2009 .

[170]  Marika M. Holland,et al.  Accelerated Arctic land warming and permafrost degradation during rapid sea ice loss , 2008 .

[171]  John Phillips,et al.  THE USE AND ABUSE OF VEGETATIONAL CONCEPTS AND TERMS , 2008 .

[172]  H. G. Jones,et al.  THERMAL AND OTHER REMOTE SENSING OF PLANT STRESS , 2008 .

[173]  C. Körner Significance of Temperature in Plant Life , 2007 .

[174]  Kyle Joly,et al.  Diets of Overwintering Caribou, Rangifer tarandus , Track Decadal Changes in Arctic Tundra Vegetation , 2007 .

[175]  Roberta E. Martin,et al.  Hyperspectral Remote Sensing of Canopy Biodiversity in Hawaiian Lowland Rainforests , 2007, Ecosystems.

[176]  C. Violle,et al.  Let the concept of trait be functional , 2007 .

[177]  F. Chapin Warming Role of Land-Surface Changes in Arctic Summer , 2007 .

[178]  F. Chapin,et al.  Role of Land-Surface Changes in Arctic Summer Warming , 2005, Science.

[179]  G. Liston,et al.  Changing snow and shrub conditions affect albedo with global implications , 2005 .

[180]  F. Chapin,et al.  Evidence and Implications of Recent Climate Change in Northern Alaska and Other Arctic Regions , 2004 .

[181]  D. Roberts,et al.  Using Imaging Spectroscopy to Study Ecosystem Processes and Properties , 2004 .

[182]  J. P. Grime,et al.  The plant traits that drive ecosystems: Evidence from three continents , 2004 .

[183]  F. Chapin Direct and indirect effects of temperature on arctic plants , 1983, Polar Biology.

[184]  W. Oechel,et al.  Effects on the function of Arctic ecosystems in the short- and long-term perspectives. , 2004, Ambio.

[185]  S. Reutebuch,et al.  Estimating Forest Structure Parameters on Fort Lewis Military Reservation using Airborne Laser Scanner (LIDAR) Data , 2004 .

[186]  P. Reich,et al.  A handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurement of plant functional traits worldwide , 2003 .

[187]  Ilkka Leinonen,et al.  Thermal Imaging for the Study of Plant Water Relations , 2003 .

[188]  M. D. Schwartz Phenology: An Integrative Environmental Science , 2003, Tasks for Vegetation Science.

[189]  S. Lavorel,et al.  Predicting changes in community composition and ecosystem functioning from plant traits: revisiting the Holy Grail , 2002 .

[190]  W. Cohen,et al.  Lidar Remote Sensing for Ecosystem Studies , 2002 .

[191]  S. Wold,et al.  PLS-regression: a basic tool of chemometrics , 2001 .

[192]  M. Sturm,et al.  Climate change: Increasing shrub abundance in the Arctic , 2001, Nature.

[193]  K. Kraus,et al.  Determination of terrain models in wooded areas with airborne laser scanner data , 1998 .

[194]  J. Gamon,et al.  The photochemical reflectance index: an optical indicator of photosynthetic radiation use efficiency across species, functional types, and nutrient levels , 1997, Oecologia.

[195]  James F. Reynolds,et al.  Arctic ecosystems in a changing climate : an ecophysiological perspective , 1993 .

[196]  S. Goward,et al.  Vegetation canopy PAR absorptance and the normalized difference vegetation index - An assessment using the SAIL model , 1992 .

[197]  P. Curran Remote sensing of foliar chemistry , 1989 .

[198]  B. Kowalski,et al.  Partial least-squares regression: a tutorial , 1986 .

[199]  R. Nelson,et al.  Determining forest canopy characteristics using airborne laser data , 1984 .

[200]  J. Berry,et al.  Photosynthetic Response and Adaptation to Temperature in Higher Plants , 1980 .

[201]  L. Tesfatsion The “Utility” , 1875, Hall's journal of health.