Active Spectral Sensor Evaluation under Varying Conditions

Plant stress has been estimated by spectral signature using both passive and active sensors. As optical sensors measure reflected light from a target, changes in illumination characteristics critically affect sensor response. Active sensors minimize the illumination effects by producing their own illumination that is reflected from the target and measured by the detector. Although active sensors use modulated radiation that can be differentiated from ambient illumination, in order to validate data and increase the accuracy, sensor performance characteristics must be well understood and examined in different target conditions of plant leaves. The performance of an active NDVI sensor was evaluated to study the effect of: 1) partial canopy coverage, 2) target off-center, 3) standoff distance, 4) target surface tilting, 5) solar bidirectional effect, 6) temperature, and 7) diurnal radiation change. These evaluations provide a valid range of sensor measurements and a motivation to improve the measurement accuracy by using selective data that can be validated by supplemental sensors.

[1]  E. V. Lukina,et al.  Improving Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Cereal Grain Production with Optical Sensing and Variable Rate Application , 2002 .

[2]  Pablo J. Zarco-Tejada,et al.  Assessing Canopy PRI for Water Stress detection with Diurnal Airborne Imagery , 2008 .

[3]  Ruhi Bastug,et al.  Relationship between spectral reflectance and water stress conditions of Bermuda grass (Cynodon dactylon L.) , 2008 .

[4]  J. F. Reid,et al.  Bidirectional effect on a spectral image sensor for in‐field crop reflectance assessment , 2007 .

[5]  R. W. Whitney,et al.  Use of Spectral Radiance for Correcting In-season Fertilizer Nitrogen Deficiencies in Winter Wheat , 1996 .

[6]  Siza D. Tumbo,et al.  HYPERSPECTRAL CHARACTERISTICS OF CORN PLANTS UNDER DIFFERENT CHLOROPHYLL LEVELS , 2000 .

[7]  L. Biehl,et al.  Sun-View Angle Effects on Reflectance Factors of Corn Canopies , 1985 .

[8]  R. Sui,et al.  MULTI-SPECTRAL SENSOR FOR DETECTION OF NITROGEN STATUS IN COTTON , 2005 .

[9]  D. Moshou,et al.  The potential of optical canopy measurement for targeted control of field crop diseases. , 2003, Annual review of phytopathology.

[10]  Óscar Pérez-Priego,et al.  Detection of water stress in orchard trees with a high-resolution spectrometer through chlorophyll fluorescence in-filling of the O/sub 2/-A band , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[11]  J. F. Reid,et al.  MODELING AND CALIBRATION OF A MULTI-SPECTRAL IMAGING SENSOR FOR IN-FIELD CROP NITROGEN ASSESSMENT , 2006 .

[12]  Marvin H. Hall,et al.  Carbon and Nitrogen Analysis of Soil Fractions Using Near-Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy , 1991 .

[13]  H. Ramon,et al.  Early Disease Detection in Wheat Fields using Spectral Reflectance , 2003 .

[14]  Renfu Lu,et al.  A NEAR–INFRARED SENSING TECHNIQUE FOR MEASURING INTERNAL QUALITY OF APPLE FRUIT , 2002 .

[15]  R. W. Whitney,et al.  Sensors for Detection of Nitrogen in Winter Wheat , 1996 .

[16]  S. D. Reed,et al.  Real-time sensing and N fertilization with a field scale greenseekerTM applicator. , 2003 .