Evaluation of the accuracy of three electronic apex locators using glass tubules.

AIM To evaluate the accuracy of three different electronic apex locators (EALs) using glass tubules. METHODOLOGY Forty-eight glass tubules with different diameters and an agar model were used to mimic root canals. A size 15 stainless steel K-file was used as the measuring electrode. The Root ZX, Propex and Neosono Ultima EZ were used to measure the tubule length with tubules dry, or filled with 0.9% NaCl, 3% H(2)O(2), 2.5% NaOCl or 17% EDTA. The distance between the real length (RL) and measured length (ML) of the tubules was recorded. The range of RL +/- 0.5 mm and RL +/- 1 mm was used to evaluate the accuracy of the EALs. Results were subject to correlation analysis and Friedman's test. RESULTS In dry tubules, the accuracy of Root ZX was 75-91.7% for RL +/- 0.5 mm and 100% for RL +/- 1 mm, whilst the measurements of the other two EALs were all within the RL +/- 0.5 mm. No influence from the increase in tubule diameter on the accuracy of all three EALs was observed in dry tubules. In tubules filled with electrolyte, the accuracy of the Root ZX decreased as tubule diameter increased (R(d) > 0, P < 0.05). The RL-ML distance recorded by Propex was inversely related to the tubule diameter (R(d) < 0, P < 0.05). The accuracy of Propex was 75-100% for RL +/- 0.5 mm and 100% for RL +/- 0.5 mm when the tubule diameter was not more than 0.80 mm, but decreased in tubules with diameter over 0.80 mm and filled with 2.5% NaOCl or 17% EDTA. Nearly, all the measurements (except for six tubules) using Neosono Ultima EZ were within 1 mm shorter than RL despite the contents in tubules and the increase of tubule diameter. CONCLUSIONS The accuracy of the Root ZX decreased as the tubule diameter increased when tubules were filled with electrolytes. The electrolytes in the tubules decreased the accuracy of Propex when the tubule diameter was large. The electrolytes in tubules and tubule diameter had no influence on the accuracy of Neosono Ultima EZ. The Propex and Neosono Ultima EZ were more accurate than the Root ZX under various conditions in this laboratory study.

[1]  N P Chandler,et al.  Electronic apex locators. , 2004, International endodontic journal.

[2]  Euiseong Kim,et al.  Electronic apex locator. , 2004, Dental clinics of North America.

[3]  A. Kielbassa,et al.  Clinical evaluation of the measuring accuracy of ROOT ZX in primary teeth. , 2003, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[4]  M H Nekoofar,et al.  The accuracy of the Neosono Ultima EZ apex locator using files of different alloys: an in vitro study. , 2002, Journal of the California Dental Association.

[5]  Fernando Goldberg,et al.  In vitro measurement accuracy of an electronic apex locator in teeth with simulated apical root resorption. , 2002, Journal of endodontics.

[6]  A. Kaufman,et al.  Accuracy of a new apex locator: an in vitro study. , 2002, International endodontic journal.

[7]  M. A. Martínez-Lozano,et al.  Methodological considerations in the determination of working length. , 2001, International endodontic journal.

[8]  W A Walker,et al.  An in vitro evaluation of the accuracy of the root ZX in the presence of various irrigants. , 2001, Journal of endodontics.

[9]  I. Uhač,et al.  Detection of a transitional ion concentration zone during electronic measurement of root canal length: a study in vitro. , 2000, International endodontic journal.

[10]  P R Wesselink,et al.  Prevalence and extent of long oval canals in the apical third. , 2000, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[11]  R Weiger,et al.  An in vitro comparison of two modern apex locators. , 1999, Journal of endodontics.

[12]  L. Martens,et al.  Accuracy of four electronic apex locators: an in vitro evaluation. , 1999, Endodontics & dental traumatology.

[13]  C. Splieth,et al.  Comparison of measurements obtained with hand files or the Canal Leader attached to electronic apex locators: an in vitro study. , 1999, International endodontic journal.

[14]  A Naaman,et al.  In vitro evaluation of the reliability of the Root ZX electronic apex locator. , 1999, International endodontic journal.

[15]  D. Ricucci.  Apical limit of root canal instrumentation and obturation, part 1. Literature review. , 2002, International endodontic journal.

[16]  L Vajrabhaya,et al.  Accuracy of apex locator. , 1997, Endodontics & dental traumatology.

[17]  N. Meredith,et al.  Electrical impedance measurements of root canal length. , 1997, Endodontics & dental traumatology.

[18]  D. H. Pratten,et al.  Comparison of radiographic and electronic working lengths. , 1996, Journal of endodontics.

[19]  C Kobayashi,et al.  Electronic canal length measurement. , 1995, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[20]  J. C. Donnelly,et al.  An in vitro test of a simplified model to demonstrate the operation of electronic root canal measuring devices. , 1994, Journal of endodontics.

[21]  A. Katz,et al.  Abstract #69 — Reliability of Root ZX apex locator texted by an in vitro model , 1993 .

[22]  E. Rivera,et al.  Accuracy of the Endex with variations in canal irrigants and foramen size. , 1993, Journal of endodontics.

[23]  L. Huang,et al.  Variables affecting electronic root canal measurement. , 1992, International endodontic journal.

[24]  R. Olson,et al.  Clinical evaluation of five electronic root canal length measuring instruments. , 1990, Journal of endodontics.

[25]  J F Corcoran,et al.  Anatomy of the root apex and its histologic changes with age. , 1990, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[26]  E J Hovland,et al.  An evaluation of the Apex Locator Endocater. , 1990, Journal of endodontics.

[27]  L. Huang,et al.  An experimental study of the principle of electronic root canal measurement. , 1987, Journal of endodontics.

[28]  Y. Nahmias,et al.  A model for demonstrating an electronic canal length measuring device. , 1983, Journal of endodontics.

[29]  I. Sunada.  New Method for Measuring the Length of the Root Canal , 1962 .

[30]  D GREEN,et al.  Stereomicroscopic study of 700 root apices of maxillary and mandibular posterior teeth. , 1960, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.