Respiratory Laryngeal Coordination in Airflow Conservation and Reduction of Respiratory Effort of Phonation.

OBJECTIVE This study evaluates the need of airflow conservation and the effect of glottal resistance on respiratory effort of phonation under different phonation conditions. METHODS A computational model of the pressure-volume-flow relationship of the respiratory system is developed. RESULTS Simulations show that increasing the glottal resistance reduces the glottal airflow and allows phonation to be sustained for a longer breath group duration. For a given breath group duration, the reduced airflow also allows phonation to be sustained within a narrow range of lung volumes, thus lowering the overall respiratory effort. CONCLUSIONS This study shows that for breath group durations and subglottal pressures typical of normal conversational speech, airflow conservation or maintaining "effortless" respiratory support does not provide a stricter requirement on the glottal resistance than that required for initiating phonation. However, the need for airflow conservation and respiratory effort reduction becomes relevant when the target subglottal pressure and breath group duration increase as in prolonged speech or singing or in conditions of weakened pulmonary function. In those conditions, the glottal resistance is expected to increase proportionally with increasing subglottal pressure to conserve airflow consumption and reduce respiratory effort.

[1]  T. Hixon,et al.  Age and speech breathing. , 1987, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[2]  J. Perkell,et al.  Glottal airflow and transglottal air pressure measurements for male and female speakers in soft, normal, and loud voice. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  Zhaoyan Zhang Regulation of glottal closure and airflow in a three-dimensional phonation model: implications for vocal intensity control. , 2015, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  Raymond D. Kent,et al.  Breath Group Analysis for Reading and Spontaneous Speech in Healthy Adults , 2010, Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica.

[5]  Francisco Azuaje,et al.  Witten IH, Frank E: Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques 2nd edition , 2006 .

[6]  C. Sapienza,et al.  Respiratory and laryngeal function of women and men during vocal intensity variation. , 1993, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[7]  Valerie J. Lund,et al.  Respiratory Function in Speech and Song , 1987 .

[8]  Karen M Coyne,et al.  Maximum static inspiratory and expiratory pressures with different lung volumes , 2006, Biomedical engineering online.

[9]  B. Simon,et al.  A comprehensive equation for the pulmonary pressure-volume curve. , 1998, Journal of applied physiology.

[10]  N. Isshiki,et al.  REGULATORY MECHANISM OF VOICE INTENSITY VARIATION. , 1964, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[11]  M. Hirano,et al.  Clinical Examination of Voice , 1981 .

[12]  R. Harris,et al.  Pressure-volume curves of the respiratory system. , 2005, Respiratory care.

[13]  J. Stemple,et al.  The value of vocal function exercises in the practice regimen of singers. , 1995, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[14]  Johan Sundberg,et al.  Lung volume levels in professional classical singing , 1997 .