Cross-Cultural Dialogical Probes

This paper explores the use of probes in a very remote Australian Aboriginal community where the rich traditional and post-colonial culture is worlds away from the urban Australian home of the research team. Cultural probes and technology probes have seen an enormous uptake in HCI as methods to develop inspiration from and insights into culture. Typically they are left behind, as unmanned probes, to collect and send data (or inspiring contributions) back to the design team. We investigate how probes align with indigenous ways of knowing, in particular a preference for situated knowledge creation, orality and co-presence. Through a case study we articulate how a technology probe became used as a means to engage in dialogue and co-creation with the local community. We found that co-presence of researchers and participants is crucial to foster engagement, unanticipated insights into culture and openings beyond the original problem-solution design framework. To highlight this, departing from the original conceptualization of probes, we propose and discuss the concept of manned cross-cultural dialogical probes.

[1]  Alessandro Soro,et al.  A Noticeboard in "Both Worlds" Unsurprising Interfaces Supporting Easy Bi-Cultural Content Publication , 2015, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[2]  Allison Druin,et al.  Technology probes: inspiring design for and with families , 2003, CHI '03.

[3]  Åsa Nyblom.  Making plans or “just thinking about the trip”? Understanding people’s travel planning in practice , 2014 .

[4]  Karin Slegers,et al.  Reciprocity in Rapid Ethnography - Giving Back by Making the Small Things Count , 2015, INTERACT.

[5]  Jenny Brands,et al.  Putting the Users of Research in the Driver's Seat: The Cooperative Research Centre for Aboriginal Health's New Approach to Research Development , 2006 .

[6]  Velma J Leeding,et al.  Anindilyakwa phonology and morphology , 1989 .

[7]  Douglas A. Harper,et al.  Talking about pictures: A case for photo elicitation , 2002 .

[8]  Heike Winschiers,et al.  The Challenges of Participatory Design in a Intercultural Context: Designing for Usability in Namibia , 2006 .

[9]  Nicola J. Bidwell,et al.  The landscape's apprentice: lessons for place-centred design from grounding documentary , 2008, DIS '08.

[10]  Edwin H. Blake,et al.  Being participated: a community approach , 2010, PDC '10.

[11]  Paul Dourish,et al.  How HCI interprets the probes , 2007, CHI.

[12]  Heike Winschiers-Theophilus,et al.  An approach to user interface design with two indigenous groups in Namibia , 2014, OZCHI.

[13]  Trevor van Weeren,et al.  Designing digital knowledge management tools with Aboriginal Australians , 2007, Digit. Creativity.

[14]  Edwin Blake,et al.  Software engineering in developing communities , 2010, CHASE '10.

[15]  R. Brislin,et al.  Cultural Diversity in People's Understanding and Uses of Time , 2003 .

[16]  Anne Clarke,et al.  The ideal and the real: Cultural and personal transformations of archaeological research on Groote Eylandt, northern Australia , 2002 .

[17]  William W. Gaver,et al.  Design: Cultural probes , 1999, INTR.

[18]  Thomas Reitmaier,et al.  ‘She looked deep into our eyes’: reflections on cross-cultural practice in rural Africa , 2011 .

[19]  Albrecht Schmidt,et al.  The drift table: designing for ludic engagement , 2004, CHI EA '04.

[20]  Minna Isomursu,et al.  Design of mobile wellness applications: identifying cross-cultural factors , 2008, OZCHI.

[21]  E. Biakolo.  On the Theoretical Foundations of Orality and Literacy , 1999 .

[22]  Robert J. Anderson,et al.  Representations and Requirements: The Value of Ethnography in System Design , 1994, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[23]  H. Triandis,et al.  Individualism and Collectivism: Cross-cultural Perspectives on Self-ingroup Relationships We Wish to Thank Our Research Collaborators for Stimulating Ideas, Data, and Moral Support in Carrying out a Complex Set of Studies. They , 2022 .

[24]  Nicola J. Bidwell,et al.  Moving the centre to design social media in rural Africa , 2016, AI & SOCIETY.

[25]  J. Hughes,et al.  Designing with Care: Adapting Cultural Probes to Inform Design in Sensitive Settings , 2003 .

[26]  Margot Brereton,et al.  Growing Existing Aboriginal Designs to Guide a Cross-Cultural Design Project , 2013, INTERACT.

[27]  William W. Gaver,et al.  Projected realities: conceptual design for cultural effect , 1999, CHI '99.

[28]  Alessandro Soro,et al.  Bi-Cultural Content Publication on a Digital Noticeboard: a Design and Cultural Differences Case Study , 2015, OZCHI.

[29]  Alessandro Soro,et al.  Towards an Analysis Framework of Technology Habituation by Older Users , 2016, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[30]  Margot Brereton,et al.  Habituated objects: everyday tangibles that foster the independent living of an elderly woman , 2013, INTR.

[31]  Dawn Bessarab,et al.  Yarning About Yarning as a Legitimate Method in Indigenous Research , 2010 .

[32]  Brendan Walker,et al.  Cultural probes and the value of uncertainty , 2004, INTR.

[33]  Manfred Tscheligi,et al.  Capture the car!: qualitative in-situ methods to grasp the automotive context , 2011, AutomotiveUI.

[34]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Postcolonial computing: a lens on design and development , 2010, CHI.

[35]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Implications for design , 2006, CHI.

[36]  Margot Brereton,et al.  Beyond ethnography: engagement and reciprocity as foundations for design research out here , 2014, CHI.

[37]  Nicola J. Bidwell,et al.  Situating digital storytelling within African communities , 2011, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[38]  Judy M. Iseke.  Indigenous Digital Storytelling in Video: Witnessing with Alma Desjarlais , 2011 .

[39]  Gary Marsden,et al.  Designing and theorizing co-located interactions , 2013, CHI.

[40]  Don Slater,et al.  EVALUATING COMMUNITY BASED MEDIA INITIATIVES : AN ETHNOGRAPHIC ACTION RESEARCH APPROACH , 2003 .