Stimulus variability and the phonetic relevance hypothesis: effects of variability in speaking style, fundamental frequency, and speaking rate on spoken word identification.

Three experiments were conducted to examine the effects of trial-to-trial variations in speaking style, fundamental frequency, and speaking rate on identification of spoken words. In addition, the experiments investigated whether any effects of stimulus variability would be modulated by phonetic confusability (i.e., lexical difficulty). In Experiment 1, trial-to-trial variations in speaking style reduced the overall identification performance compared with conditions containing no speaking-style variability. In addition, the effects of variability were greater for phonetically confusable words than for phonetically distinct words. In Experiment 2, variations in fundamental frequency were found to have no significant effects on spoken word identification and did not interact with lexical difficulty. In Experiment 3, two different methods for varying speaking rate were found to have equivalent negative effects on spoken word recognition and similar interactions with lexical difficulty. Overall, the findings are consistent with a phonetic-relevance hypothesis, in which accommodating sources of acoustic-phonetic variability that affect phonetically relevant properties of speech signals can impair spoken word identification. In contrast, variability in parameters of the speech signal that do not affect phonetically relevant properties are not expected to affect overall identification performance. Implications of these findings for the nature and development of lexical representations are discussed.

[1]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Recognizing Spoken Words: The Neighborhood Activation Model , 1998, Ear and hearing.

[2]  L D Braida,et al.  Effects of token variability on our ability to distinguish between vowels , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  R. Newman,et al.  The perceptual consequences of within-talker variability in fricative production. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Effects of talker, rate, and amplitude variation on recognition memory for spoken words , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[5]  M F Dorman,et al.  Shifts in phonetic identification with changes in signal presentation level. , 1981, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  Mitchell S. Sommers,et al.  EFFECTS OF ACOUSTIC VARIABILITY ON SECOND LANGUAGE VOCABULARY LEARNING , 2005, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[7]  D B Pisoni,et al.  Stimulus variability and processing dependencies in speech perception , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  J. Mullennix,et al.  Some effects of talker variability on spoken word recognition. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  David B. Pisoni,et al.  Speech perception, word recognition and the structure of the lexicon , 1985, Speech Commun..

[10]  M. Sommers,et al.  Inhibitory processes and spoken word recognition in young and older adults: the interaction of lexical competition and semantic context. , 1999, Psychology and aging.

[11]  David B. Pisoni,et al.  Long-term memory in speech perception: Some new findings on talker variability, speaking rate and perceptual learning , 1993, Speech Commun..

[12]  Mitchell S. Sommers,et al.  The structural organization of the mental lexicon and its contribution to age-related declines in spoken-word recognition. , 1996 .

[13]  C J Darwin,et al.  Phoneme-monitoring reaction time and preceding prosody: Effects of stop closure duration and of fundamental frequency , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[14]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Competition and segmentation in spoken word recognition , 1994, ICSLP.

[15]  S. Goldinger.  Words and voices: episodic traces in spoken word identification and recognition memory. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[16]  D B Pisoni,et al.  Stimulus variability and spoken word recognition. I. Effects of variability in speaking rate and overall amplitude. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  Spoken word recognition in individuals with dementia of the Alzheimer's type: changes in talker normalization and lexical discrimination. , 1998, Psychology and aging.

[18]  M S Sommers.  Stimulus variability and spoken word recognition. II. The effects of age and hearing impairment. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  S. M. Sheffert,et al.  Voice-specificity effects on auditory word priming , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[20]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Effects of stimulus variability on perception and representation of spoken words in memory , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.