Seismic behaviour of shallow foundations on layered liquefiable soils

Earthquakes have been historically perceived as one of the most damaging natural hazards. Seismic soil liquefaction is often one of the major sources of damage and disruptions, and has been observed to severely affect key lifelines. Settlement and tilting of shallow foundations resting on saturated sandy/silty soils has been repeatedly observed throughout the world as a consequence of liquefaction or softening of the foundation soil. Such settlements and tilts can render structures unusable, and homes uninhabitable, causing significant economic losses. Despite the undoubted relevance of this phenomenon, field data on the liquefaction induced settlement of shallow foundations are scarce. New data from 24 buildings that suffered settlement and tilting as a consequences of soil liquefaction during the February 27th 2010 Maule earthquake in Chile, are presented in this work to supplement the existing field cases database. Due to the complexity of this phenomenon, field data are not sufficient to fully understand the mechanisms controlling the settlement of structures resting on liquefied or softened ground.In this framework, centrifuge modelling provides a valuable tool for research by reproducing field conditions in a controlled environment. A series of 10 dynamic centrifuge tests were performed as part of this work. Thanks to the University of Dundee newly installed centrifuge-mounted servohydraulic earthquake simulator, scaled version of field earthquake motions were reproduced in the models tested, enhancing the reliability of experimental results. Particular attention was given to the effect of key parameters on the observed foundation settlement. These parameters are the bearing pressure of the foundation, the thickness of the liquefied soil layer and the soil’s relative density. The effect of the soil layering pattern was also investigated, with particular attention to the effect of a low permeability soil crust overlying the liquefied soil. Results suggest that the excess pore pressure generation in the foundation soil is significantly influenced by the stress distribution due to the presence of the foundation itself. In particular, lower excess pore pressure where measured in soil subjected to high static shear stresses (i.e. below the edge of a footing). The soil stratification pattern, and the relative thicknesses of the liquefied and un-liquefied portions of the soil profile, were also found to play a crucial role in determining the seismic demand at foundation level and the type of failure mechanism leading to foundation settlement. Observed differences between centrifuge (i.e. field) and element testing soil response are also discussed. Experimental results are compared to field observations, with the aim of improving the current understanding of the behaviour of structures built on shallow foundations in the eventuality of seismic induced liquefaction of their foundation soil.

[1]  Susumu Yasuda,et al.  Description and analysis of geotechnical aspects associated to the large 2010 Chile earthquake , 2010 .

[2]  Gonzalo Castro,et al.  Liquefaction and Cyclic Mobility of Saturated Sands , 1975 .

[3]  Robert V. Whitman,et al.  Initial Results from a Stacked Ring Apparatus for Simulation of a Soil Profile , 1981 .

[4]  Spg Madabhushi,et al.  A new Stored Angular Momentum (SAM) based earthquake actuator , 1998 .

[5]  Kohji Tokimatsu,et al.  Liquefaction-induced damage to buildings in 1990 Luzon earthquake , 1994 .

[6]  Yoginder P. Vaid,et al.  Confining stress and static shear effects in cyclic liquefaction , 2001 .

[7]  石原 研而,et al.  Soil behaviour in earthquake geotechnics , 1996 .

[8]  Vinod K. Garga,et al.  ディスカッション The Steady State of Sandy Soils , 1997 .

[9]  Ken Been,et al.  Soil Liquefaction: A Critical State Approach , 2006 .

[10]  M. Berilgen,et al.  Investigation of liquefaction and pore water pressure development in layered sands , 2009 .

[11]  Riley M. Chung,et al.  Influence of SPT Procedures in Soil Liquefaction Resistance Evaluations , 1985 .

[12]  V. Drnevich,et al.  Shear Modulus and Damping in Soils: Measurement and Parameter Effects (Terzaghi Leture) , 1972 .

[13]  Toru Shibata,et al.  LIQUEFACTION OF SATURATED SANDS DURING CYCLIC LOADING , 1970 .

[14]  I. M. Idriss,et al.  SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE FOR EVALUATING SOIL LIQUEFACTION POTENTIAL , 1971 .

[15]  Donald E. Yule,et al.  The influence of confining stress on liquefaction resistance , 1998 .

[17]  I. Towhata Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering , 2008 .

[18]  Ken Been,et al.  A STATE PARAMETER FOR SANDS , 1985 .

[19]  Shideh Dashti Toward developing an engineering procedure for evaluating building performance on softened ground , 2009 .

[20]  Spg Madabhushi,et al.  Experimental study of boundary effects in dynamic centrifuge modelling , 2003 .

[21]  J. Stewart,et al.  Prediction Equations for Significant Duration of Earthquake Ground Motions considering Site and Near-Source Effects , 2006 .

[22]  Ikuo Towhata,et al.  SUBSIDENCE OF BUILDING FOUNDATION RESTING UPON LIQUEFIED SUBSOIL : CASE STUDIES AND ASSESSMENT , 2001 .

[23]  A. Schofield,et al.  Critical State Soil Mechanics , 1968 .

[24]  Ross W. Boulanger,et al.  Liquefaction Susceptibility Criteria for Silts and Clays , 2006 .

[25]  J. A. Sladen,et al.  The liquefaction of sands, a collapse surface approach , 1985 .

[26]  Gonzalo Castro,et al.  Liquefaction of sands , 1969 .

[27]  L. Ishihara,et al.  Stability of Natural Deposits during Earthquakes , 1985 .

[28]  P. Robertson,et al.  Evaluating cyclic liquefaction potential using the cone penetration test , 1998 .

[29]  Spg Madabhushi,et al.  Evaluation of Shear Modulus and Damping in Dynamic Centrifuge Tests , 2005 .

[30]  Timothy D. Stark,et al.  Use of laboratory data to confirm yield and liquefied strength ratio concepts , 2003 .

[31]  I. Ishibashi,et al.  UNIFIED DYNAMIC SHEAR MODULI AND DAMPING RATIOS OF SAND AND CLAY , 1993 .

[32]  Spg Madabhushi,et al.  Comparing laminar and equivalent shear beam (ESB) containers for dynamic centrifuge modelling , 2006 .

[33]  Yoginder P. Vaid,et al.  Effect of Static Shear on Resistance to Liquefaction , 1983 .

[34]  John Ross Jeffrey Investigating the performance of continuous helical displacement piles , 2012 .

[35]  H. Bolton Seed,et al.  Ground Motions and Soil Liquefaction During Earthquakes , 1982 .

[36]  Jonathan Knappett,et al.  Effects of Axial Load and Slope Arrangement on Pile Group Response in Laterally Spreading Soils , 2012 .

[37]  B. Kutter,et al.  The Mechanism of Liquefaction in Layered Soils , 1992 .

[38]  신성우,et al.  Geotechnical Centrifuge Modelling의 공동연구 사례 , 2013 .

[39]  R. P. Orense Soil liquefaction during the 2010 Darfield and 1990 Luzon Earthquakes: A comparative study , 2011 .

[40]  Gonzalo Castro,et al.  Factors Affecting Liquefaction and Cyclic Mobility , 1977 .

[41]  N. Yoshida,et al.  Simulation of liquefaction beneath an impermeable surface layer , 2000 .

[42]  L. Coelho,et al.  In situ densification as a liquefaction resistance measure for bridge foundations , 2007 .

[43]  Michael K. Sharp,et al.  Liquefaction of Deep Saturated Sands Under High Effective Confining Stress , 2001 .

[44]  Ahmed Elgamal,et al.  Dynamic Response of Saturated Dense Sand in Laminated Centrifuge Container , 2005 .

[45]  Spg Madabhushi,et al.  Experience using MEMS-based accelerometers in dynamic testing , 2010 .

[46]  H B Seed,et al.  Dynamic Strength of Anisotropically Consolidated Sand , 1967 .

[47]  Andrew Schofield,et al.  Disturbed Soil Properties and Geotechnical Design , 2005 .

[48]  H. Seed Soil moduli and damping factors for dynamic response analyses , 1970 .

[49]  Guy T. Houlsby,et al.  Transient vertical loading of model suction caissons in a pressure chamber , 2006 .

[50]  Alec Westley Skempton,et al.  Standard penetration test procedures and the effects in sands of overburden pressure, relative density, particle size, ageing and overconsolidation , 1986 .

[51]  A. Casagrande,et al.  Characteristics of cohesionless soils affecting the stability of slopes and earth fills , 1940 .

[52]  K Tokimatsu,et al.  STATIC SHEAR AND LIQUEFACTION POTENTIAL , 1981 .

[53]  J. B. Berrill,et al.  Observations Of The Earthquake Response Of Foundations In Soil Profiles Containing Saturated Sands , 2000 .

[54]  K. Ishihara Liquefaction and flow failure during earthquakes. , 1993 .

[55]  Keith Duncan Lauder,et al.  The performance of pipeline ploughs , 2010 .

[56]  時松 孝次,et al.  UNDRAINED CYCLIC SHEAR STRENGTH OF A DENSE NIIGATA SAND , 1984 .

[57]  W. F. Marcuson,et al.  Liquefaction Resistance of Soils: Summary Report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF Workshops on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils , 2001 .

[58]  Shamsher Prakash,et al.  Liquefaction of Silts and Silt-Clay Mixtures , 1999 .

[59]  時松 孝次,et al.  Settlement of buildings on saturated sand during earthquakes. , 1977 .

[60]  Ricardo Dobry,et al.  SEISMIC RESPONSE OF SHALLOW FOUNDATION ON LIQUEFIABLE SAND , 1997 .

[61]  Dong-Soo Kim,et al.  Performance of an equivalent shear beam (ESB) model container for dynamic geotechnical centrifuge tests , 2013 .

[62]  H. Worthington Seismic Design for Nuclear Power Plants , 1971 .

[63]  M. P. Luong,et al.  Undrained Behaviour of Cohesionless Soils Under Cyclic and Transient Loading , 1981 .

[64]  Ross W. Boulanger,et al.  Semi-empirical procedures for evaluating liquefaction potential during earthquakes , 2006 .

[65]  I. Jefferson,et al.  Soil mechanics in engineering practice , 1997 .

[66]  Takaji Kokusho,et al.  Current state of research on flow failure considering void redistribution in liquefied deposits , 2003 .

[67]  Andrew Brennan,et al.  Vertical drains as a countermeasure to earthquake-induced soil liquefaction , 2004 .

[68]  D. P. Stewart,et al.  EXPERIENCE WITH THE USE OF METHYLCELLULOSE AS A VISCOUS PORE FLUID IN CENTRIFUGE MODELS. TECHNICAL NOTE , 1998 .