Vestibular coriolis effect differences modeled with three-dimensional linear-angular interactions.

The vestibular coriolis (or "cross-coupling") effect is traditionally explained by cross-coupled angular vectors, which, however, do not explain the differences in perceptual disturbance under different acceleration conditions. For example, during head roll tilt in a rotating chair, the magnitude of perceptual disturbance is affected by a number of factors, including acceleration or deceleration of the chair rotation or a zero-g environment. Therefore, it has been suggested that linear-angular interactions play a role. The present research investigated whether these perceptual differences and others involving linear coriolis accelerations could be explained under one common framework: the laws of motion in three dimensions, which include all linear-angular interactions among all six components of motion (three angular and three linear). The results show that the three-dimensional laws of motion predict the differences in perceptual disturbance. No special properties of the vestibular system or nervous system are required. In addition, simulations were performed with angular, linear, and tilt time constants inserted into the model, giving the same predictions. Three-dimensional graphics were used to highlight the manner in which linear-angular interaction causes perceptual disturbance, and a crucial component is the Stretch Factor, which measures the "unexpected" linear component.

[1]  B. Cohen,et al.  Effects of tilt of the gravito-inertial acceleration vector on the angular vestibuloocular reflex during centrifugation. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  J R Lackner,et al.  Multisensory, cognitive, and motor influences on human spatial orientation in weightlessness. , 1993, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[3]  S Glasauer,et al.  A Simple Model of Vestibular Canal‐Otolith Signal Fusion , 1999, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[4]  F. Guedry,et al.  Coriolis cross-coupling effects: disorienting and nauseogenic or not? , 1978, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[5]  B. Peterson,et al.  Spatial and temporal response properties of secondary neurons that receive convergent input in vestibular nuclei of alert cats , 1984, Brain Research.

[6]  L. Young,et al.  A revised dynamic otolith model. , 1968, Aerospace medicine.

[7]  V. V. Marlinsky Vestibular and vestibulo-proprioceptive perception of motion in the horizontal plane in blindfolded man. Estimations of linear displacement , 1999, Neuroscience.

[8]  G. Bush,et al.  A Model of Responses of Horizontal‐Canal‐Related Vestibular Nuclei Neurons that Respond to Linear Head Acceleration , 1992, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[9]  D M Merfeld,et al.  Modeling human vestibular responses during eccentric rotation and off vertical axis rotation. , 1995, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[10]  Jelte E. Bos,et al.  Theoretical considerations on canal–otolith interaction and an observer model , 2002, Biological Cybernetics.

[11]  L. Young,et al.  Integration of semicircular canal and otolith information for multisensory orientation stimuli , 1977 .

[12]  J R Lackner,et al.  The influence of gravitoinertial force level on oculomotor and perceptual responses to sudden stop stimulation. , 1987, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[13]  S. H. Seidman,et al.  Tilt perception during dynamic linear acceleration , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[14]  F E Guedry,et al.  Comparison of subjective responses to semicircular canal stimulation produced by rotation about different axes. , 1971, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[15]  F E Guedry,et al.  The dynamics of spatial orientation during complex and changing linear and angular acceleration. , 1992, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[16]  Michael Fetter,et al.  Three-Dimensional Kinematics of Eye, Head and Limb Movements , 1997 .

[17]  D M Merfeld,et al.  Humans use internal models to estimate gravity and linear acceleration , 1999, Nature.

[18]  T Raphan,et al.  Modeling the spatiotemporal organization of velocity storage in the vestibuloocular reflex by optokinetic studies. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  Shirley Dex,et al.  JR 旅客販売総合システム(マルス)における運用及び管理について , 1991 .

[20]  J. Holly,et al.  Subject-coincident coordinate systems and sustained motions , 1996 .

[21]  L R Young,et al.  Orientation illusions and heart-rate changes during short-radius centrifugation. , 2001, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[22]  L. Young,et al.  A multidimensional model of the effect of gravity on the spatial orientation of the monkey. , 1993, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[23]  L R Young,et al.  Optimal estimator model for human spatial orientation. , 1988, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[24]  V. V. Marlinsky,et al.  Vestibular and vestibulo-proprioceptive perception of motion in the horizontal plane in blindfolded man—III. Route inference , 1999, Neuroscience.

[25]  J. Holly Perceptual disturbances predicted in zero-g through three-dimensional modeling. , 2003, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[26]  A Graybiel,et al.  Individual differences in susceptibility to motion sickness among six Skylab astronauts. , 1975, Acta astronautica.

[27]  F. Guedry Psychophysics of Vestibular Sensation , 1974 .

[28]  C. Barnes,et al.  Ipsilateral utricular and semicircular canal interactions from electrical stimulation of individual vestibular nerve branches recorded in the descending medial longitudinal fasciculus , 1977, Brain Research.

[29]  Christian Darlot,et al.  Using sensory weighting to model the influence of canal, otolith and visual cues on spatial orientation and eye movements , 2002, Biological Cybernetics.

[30]  B. Hess,et al.  Low-frequency otolith and semicircular canal interactions after canal inactivation , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[31]  Theodore Raphan,et al.  The vestibulo-ocular reflex in three dimensions , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[32]  J. Groen,et al.  The problems of the spinning top applied to the semi-circular canals. , 1961, Confinia Neurologica.

[33]  L. Young,et al.  Three dimensional eye movements of squirrel monkeys following postrotatory tilt. , 1993, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[34]  J. Holly Three-dimensional baselines for perceived self-motion during acceleration and deceleration in a centrifuge. , 1997, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[35]  C. Oman A heuristic mathematical model for the dynamics of sensory conflict and motion sickness. , 1982, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[36]  H Mittelstaedt,et al.  The influence of otoliths and somatic graviceptors on angular velocity estimation. , 1996, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[37]  Ian S. Curthoys,et al.  The delay of the oculogravic illusion , 1996, Brain Research Bulletin.

[38]  W. Bles,et al.  Modelling motion sickness and subjective vertical mismatch detailed for vertical motions , 1998, Brain Research Bulletin.

[39]  A. Graybiel,et al.  Factors contributing to the delay in the perception of the oculogravic illusion. , 1966, The American journal of psychology.

[40]  S. Glasauer,et al.  Modelling Three-Dimensional Vestibular Responses During Complex Motion Stimulation , 1997 .

[41]  J R Lackner,et al.  The effective intensity of Coriolis, cross-coupling stimulation is gravitoinertial force dependent: implications for space motion sickness. , 1986, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[42]  D. Merfeld Modeling the vestibulo-ocular reflex of the squirrel monkey during eccentric rotation and roll tilt , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[43]  Dora E Angelaki,et al.  Vestibular convergence patterns in vestibular nuclei neurons of alert primates. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[44]  B. Hess,et al.  Inertial representation of angular motion in the vestibular system of rhesus monkeys. II. Otolith-controlled transformation that depends on an intact cerebellar nodulus. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[45]  G. M. Jones,et al.  Origin significance and amelioration of coriolis illusions from the semicircular canals: a non-mathematical appraisal. , 1970, Aerospace medicine.

[46]  W. Bles Coriolis effects and motion sickness modelling , 1998, Brain Research Bulletin.

[47]  L. Young,et al.  The vestibulo-ocular reflex of the squirrel monkey during eccentric rotation and roll tilt , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[48]  J. Holly Baselines for three-dimensional perception of combined linear and angular self-motion with changing rotational axis. , 2000, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[49]  B. Hess,et al.  Inertial representation of angular motion in the vestibular system of rhesus monkeys. I. Vestibuloocular reflex. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[50]  I S Curthoys,et al.  Convergence of labyrinthine influences on units in the vestibular nuclei of the cat. I. Natural stimulation. , 1971, Brain research.

[51]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[52]  Groen Jj The problems of the spinning top applied to the semi-circular canals. , 1961 .

[53]  W. C. Hixson,et al.  Kinematics nomenclature for physiological accelerations with special reference to vestibular applications , 1966 .

[54]  A. Graybiel,et al.  The Delay in Visual Reorientation following Exposure to a Change in Direction of Resultant Force on a Human Centrifuge , 1951 .

[55]  L. Zupan,et al.  Neural processing of gravitoinertial cues in humans. III. Modeling tilt and translation responses. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[56]  Jacques Droulez,et al.  Visuovestibular perception of self-motion modeled as a dynamic optimization process , 2002, Biological Cybernetics.

[57]  S Glasauer Interaction of Semicircular Canals and Otoliths in the Processing Structure of the Subjective Zenith , 1992, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[58]  D E Angelaki,et al.  Vestibular Discrimination of Gravity and Translational Acceleration , 2001, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[59]  A. Graybiel,et al.  Experiment M131. Human vestibular function , 1973 .

[60]  Theodore Raphan,et al.  Compensatory and orienting eye movements induced by off-vertical axis rotation (OVAR) in monkeys. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.