Extraneous factors in judicial decisions

Are judicial rulings based solely on laws and facts? Legal formalism holds that judges apply legal reasons to the facts of a case in a rational, mechanical, and deliberative manner. In contrast, legal realists argue that the rational application of legal reasons does not sufficiently explain the decisions of judges and that psychological, political, and social factors influence judicial rulings. We test the common caricature of realism that justice is “what the judge ate for breakfast” in sequential parole decisions made by experienced judges. We record the judges’ two daily food breaks, which result in segmenting the deliberations of the day into three distinct “decision sessions.” We find that the percentage of favorable rulings drops gradually from ≈65% to nearly zero within each decision session and returns abruptly to ≈65% after a break. Our findings suggest that judicial rulings can be swayed by extraneous variables that should have no bearing on legal decisions.

[1]  Jerome Frank,et al.  Law and the modern mind , 1931 .

[2]  L. Clegg,et al.  The common law , 2020, Learning Law.

[3]  G. Northcraft,et al.  Experts, amateurs, and real estate: An anchoring-and-adjustment perspective on property pricing decisions , 1987 .

[4]  Vandra L. Huber,et al.  The framing of negotiations: Contextual versus task frames , 1987 .

[5]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective , 1989 .

[6]  A. Kozinski,et al.  What I Ate for Breakfast and Other Mysteries of Judicial Decision Making , 1993 .

[7]  R. Baumeister,et al.  Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: does self-control resemble a muscle? , 2000, Psychological bulletin.

[8]  D. Rosenbaum,et al.  Policies , Processes , and Decisions of the Criminal Justice System , 2000 .

[9]  D. Steffensmeier,et al.  Judges' Race and Judicial Decision Making: Do Black Judges Sentence Differently? , 2001 .

[10]  Chris Guthrie,et al.  Inside the Judicial Mind , 2001 .

[11]  Mandeep K. Dhami,et al.  Psychological Models of Professional Decision Making , 2003, Psychological science.

[12]  W. Edmundson,et al.  The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory , 2008 .

[13]  C. Judd,et al.  The Influence of Afrocentric Facial Features in Criminal Sentencing , 2004, Psychological science.

[14]  F. Strack,et al.  Playing Dice With Criminal Sentences: The Influence of Irrelevant Anchors on Experts’ Judicial Decision Making , 2006, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[15]  R. Baumeister,et al.  The Physiology of Willpower: Linking Blood Glucose to Self-Control , 2007, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[16]  Chris Guthrie,et al.  Blinking on the Bench: How Judges Decide Cases , 2007 .

[17]  Mark Muraven,et al.  Restoring the self: Positive affect helps improve self-regulation following ego depletion , 2007 .

[18]  Noelle M. Nelson,et al.  Making choices impairs subsequent self-control: a limited-resource account of decision making, self-regulation, and active initiative. , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  K. Burns,et al.  After Depletion: The Replenishment of the Self's Regulatory Resources , 2008 .

[20]  R. Dhar,et al.  Deciding without Resources: Resource Depletion and Choice in Context , 2009 .

[21]  M. Hagger,et al.  Ego depletion and the strength model of self-control: a meta-analysis. , 2010, Psychological bulletin.

[22]  Andreas Herrmann,et al.  Order in Product Customization Decisions: Evidence from Field Experiments , 2010, Journal of Political Economy.

[23]  R. Sulitzeanu-Kenan,et al.  Let My People Go: Ethnic In-Group Bias in Judicial Decisions - Evidence from a Randomized Natural Experiment , 2009 .

[24]  Keren Weinshall-Margel,et al.  Overlooked factors in the analysis of parole decisions , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  N. Vidmar.  The Psychology of Trial Judging , 2011 .