The selfish nature of generosity: harassment and food sharing in primates

Animals may share food to gain immediate or delayed fitness benefits. Previous studies of sharing have concentrated on delayed benefits such as reciprocity, trade and punishment. This study tests an alternative model (the harassment or sharing–under–pressure hypothesis) in which a food owner immediately benefits because sharing avoids costly harassment from a beggar. I present an experiment that varies the potential ability of the beggar to harass, and of the owner to defend the food, to examine the effects of harassment on food sharing in two primate species: chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and squirrel monkeys (Saimiri boliviensis). For both species, high levels of harassment potential significantly increased both beggar harassment and sharing by the owner. Food defensibility did not affect harassment or sharing. Interestingly, squirrel monkeys and chimpanzees shared equally frequently with conspecifics despite a much higher natural sharing rate in chimpanzees. These results suggest that harassment can play a significant role in primate food sharing, providing a simple alternative to reciprocity. The selfish nature of harassment has implications for economic, psychological and evolutionary studies of cooperative systems.

[1]  W. Hamilton.  The genetical evolution of social behaviour. II. , 1964, Journal of theoretical biology.

[2]  W. Hamilton.  The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. , 1964, Journal of theoretical biology.

[3]  R. Trivers.  The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism , 1971, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[4]  M. Sahlins.  Stone Age Economics , 2020 .

[5]  Geza Teleki,et al.  The Predatory Behavior of Wild Chimpanzees , 1973 .

[6]  R. Wrangham.  The behavioural ecology of chimpanzees in Gombe National Park, Tanzania , 1975 .

[7]  Comparisons of feeding behavior in captive squirrel and titi monkeys (Saimiri sciureus and Callicebus moloch). , 1983 .

[8]  N. Jones.  A selfish origin for human food sharing: Tolerated theft , 1984 .

[9]  D. E. Stuart,et al.  Food Sharing Among Ache Foragers: Tests of Explanatory Hypotheses [and Comments and Reply] , 1985, Current Anthropology.

[10]  J. Goodall.  The Chimpanzees of Gombe: Patterns of Behavior , 1986 .

[11]  F. D. Waal,et al.  Food sharing and reciprocal obligations among chimpanzees , 1989 .

[12]  D. Hirshleifer,et al.  COOPERATION IN A REPEATED PRISONERS' DILEMMA WITH OSTRACISM , 1989 .

[13]  P. Richerson,et al.  Punishment allows the evolution of cooperation (or anything else) in sizable groups , 1992 .

[14]  M. Hauser.  Costs of deception: cheaters are punished in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  M. Hauser,et al.  Food-elicited calls in chimpanzees: effects of food quantity and divisibility , 1993, Animal Behaviour.

[16]  Jon Altman,et al.  Why Hunter-Gatherers Work: An Ancient Version of the Problem of Public Goods [and Comments and Reply] , 1993, Current Anthropology.

[17]  J. Goodall,et al.  Patterns of predation by chimpanzees on red colobus monkeys in Gombe National Park, 1982-1991. , 1994, American journal of physical anthropology.

[18]  C. Packer,et al.  Cooperation in male lions: kinship, reciprocity or mutualism? , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[19]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Punishment in animal societies , 1995, Nature.

[20]  D. Stephens,et al.  Testing models of non-kin cooperation: mutualism and the Prisoner’s Dilemma , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[21]  D. Bird,et al.  Delayed Reciprocity and Tolerated Theft: The Behavioral Ecology of Food-Sharing Strategies , 1997, Current Anthropology.

[22]  F. D. de Waal.  Food transfers through mesh in brown capuchins. , 1997, Journal of comparative psychology.

[23]  L. Dugatkin,et al.  Cooperation and the Prisoner's Dilemma: towards testable models of mutualism versus reciprocity , 1997, Animal Behaviour.

[24]  E. Fehr,et al.  Cooperation and Punishment in Public Goods Experiments , 1999, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[25]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Selfish sentinels in cooperative mammals. , 1999, Science.

[26]  H. Gintis.  Strong reciprocity and human sociality. , 2000, Journal of theoretical biology.

[27]  K. Hawkes.  Hunting and the evolution of egalitarian societies: lessons from the Hadza , 2000 .

[28]  R Boyd,et al.  Why people punish defectors. Weak conformist transmission can stabilize costly enforcement of norms in cooperative dilemmas. , 2001, Journal of theoretical biology.

[29]  J. Mitani,et al.  Why do chimpanzees hunt and share meat? , 2001, Animal Behaviour.

[30]  D. Stephens,et al.  Discounting and Reciprocity in an Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma , 2002, Science.

[31]  William T. Harbaugh,et al.  The Carrot or the Stick: Rewards, Punishments and Cooperation , 2002 .

[32]  D. Stephens,et al.  Food sharing: a model of manipulation by harassment , 2002 .

[33]  Sarah F. Brosnan,et al.  A proximate perspective on reciprocal altruism , 2002, Human nature.

[34]  M. Hauser,et al.  Give unto others: genetically unrelated cotton-top tamarin monkeys preferentially give food to those who altruistically give food back , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[35]  R. Boyd,et al.  The evolution of altruistic punishment , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  Cognitive constraints on reciprocity and tolerated scrounging , 2004, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[37]  M. Gurven.  To give and to give not: The behavioral ecology of human food transfers , 2004, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[38]  M. Hauser,et al.  Why be nice? Psychological constraints on the evolution of cooperation , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[39]  J. Stevens,et al.  A conceptual framework for nonkin food sharing: timing and currency of benefits , 2004, Animal Behaviour.