Application of microfiltration and ultrafiltration processes to cork processing wastewaters and assessment of the membrane fouling

Abstract The filtration of wastewaters generated in the cork industrial process is investigated by using three membranes in tangential filtration laboratory equipment. The three membranes used were two microfiltration membranes with pores sizes of 0.65 and 0.1 μm (DUR-0.65 and DUR-0.1 membranes), and a ultrafiltration membrane with a molecular weight cut-off of 300 kDa (BIO-300K membrane). The water hydraulic permeability was determined for each membrane (values of 860, 248 and 769 L h −1  m −2  bar −1 were found), and the influence on the permeate flux of the main operating variables, such as transmembrane pressure, feed flow rate, temperature and nature of the membranes, was established. The effectiveness of the different membranes and operating conditions was evaluated by determining the removal obtained for several parameters which measure the global pollutant content of the effluent: COD, absorbance at 254 nm, tannic content, color and ellagic acid, which is selected as a major model pollutant among the different organic compounds present in this wastewater. The values of the corresponding retention coefficients depended on the operating conditions, but in all cases were in the sequence: ellagic acid and color > absorbance at 254 nm > tannic content > COD. Globally, the higher removals were obtained for the BIO-300K membrane at 20 °C, with Q F  = 5.3 L h −1 and TMP = 1.8 bar. Finally, the fouling of the membranes was assessed, and the corresponding mechanism for each membrane was established by fitting the experimental data to various filtration fouling models reported in the literature.

[1]  E. P. Jacobs,et al.  UF of pulp and paper effluent: membrane fouling-prevention and cleaning , 2002 .

[2]  J. L. Acero,et al.  Chemical treatment of cork-processing wastewaters for potential reuse , 2004 .

[3]  A. Pauss,et al.  A compact process for the treatment of olive mill wastewater by combining OF and UV/H2O2 techniques , 2004 .

[4]  W Scholz,et al.  Techno-economic evaluation of membrane filtration for the recovery and re-use of tanning chemicals. , 2003, Water research.

[5]  Ana Maria Brites Alves,et al.  Ultrafiltration for colour removal of tannery dyeing wastewaters , 2000 .

[6]  J. L. Acero,et al.  Purification of cork processing wastewaters by ozone, by activated sludge, and by their two sequential applications. , 2003, Water research.

[7]  P. R. Ball Scale-up and scale-down of membrane-based separation processes , 2000 .

[8]  Chris Buckley,et al.  Cake Formation in Cross-Flow Microfiltration Systems , 1992 .

[9]  Marcel Mulder,et al.  Basic Principles of Membrane Technology , 1991 .

[10]  Y. Magara,et al.  Advanced membrane technology for application to water treatment , 1998 .

[11]  S. Ong,et al.  Ultrafiltration of ink and latex wastewaters using cellulose membranes , 2004 .

[12]  J. L. Acero,et al.  Removal of Phenolic Compounds in Water by Ultrafiltration Membrane Treatments , 2005, Journal of environmental science and health. Part A, Toxic/hazardous substances & environmental engineering.

[13]  G. Vladisavljević,et al.  Permeate flux and fouling resistance in ultrafiltration of depectinized apple juice using ceramic membranes , 2003 .

[14]  M. N. de Pinho,et al.  Flocculation/flotation/ultrafiltration integrated process for the treatment of cork processing wastewaters. , 2001, Environmental science & technology.

[15]  M. D. Pinho,et al.  Tannic-membrane interactions on ultrafiltration of cork processing wastewaters , 2001 .

[16]  Robert W. Field,et al.  Process factors during removal of oil-in-water emulsions with cross-flow microfiltration , 1996 .

[17]  Gustavo Capannelli,et al.  Treatment and reuse of textile effluents based on new ultrafiltration and other membrane technologies , 2001 .

[18]  A. Pauss,et al.  Treatment of olive mill washing water by ultrafiltration , 2000 .

[19]  M. Brenes,et al.  The recycling of table olive brine using ultrafiltration and activated carbon adsorption , 1992 .

[20]  M. Jaffrin,et al.  Comparison between filtrations at fixed transmembrane pressure and fixed permeate flux : application to a membrane bioreactor used for wastewater treatment , 1999 .

[21]  R. Machado,et al.  Separation of nutmeg essential oil and dense CO2 with a cellulose acetate reverse osmosis membrane , 2001 .

[22]  T. Mohammadi,et al.  Wastewater treatment using ultrafiltration at a vegetable oil factory , 2004 .

[23]  I. Chang,et al.  Wastewater treatment using membrane filtration—effect of biosolids concentration on cake resistance , 2005 .

[24]  Vincenza Calabrò,et al.  An integrated centrifugation–ultrafiltration system in the treatment of olive mill wastewater , 2002 .

[25]  R. Aim,et al.  Treatment of wastewater by ultrafiltration , 1999 .

[26]  Y. G. Park Effect of ozonation for reducing membrane-fouling in the UF membrane☆ , 2002 .