Cooperation-based innovators and peripheral cooperators: An empirical analysis of their characteristics and behavior

Abstract There are many controversies in the literature over the influence of different firm characteristics on the importance to the firm of cooperation for innovation. Empirical studies have focused on the fact of cooperation but have not measured its importance for the firm. The purpose of this work is to go a step further by investigating the characteristics and cooperative behaviour of firms that use cooperation as the main way to achieve innovation (cooperation-based innovators). We draw on the 2004 Spanish Innovation Survey and employ a two-step Heckman model. Our main results show that there are sharp differences among firms. More precisely, we find that smaller firms and firms outside the high-tech sectors are more likely to be cooperation-based innovators. We also find that the type of cooperative behaviour matters. Cooperation with providers, with a few agents and with national partners are strong features of cooperation-based innovators. We discuss some management and policy implications of our results.

[1]  L. Klomp,et al.  Linking Innovation and Firm Performance: A New Approach , 2001 .

[2]  R. Boschma.  Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment , 2005 .

[3]  H. Chesbrough,et al.  Beyond High Tech: Early Adopters of Open Innovation in Other Industries , 2006 .

[4]  Rajneesh Narula,et al.  Choosing Between Internal and Non-internal R&D Activities: Some Technological and Economic Factors , 2001, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[5]  Ulrich Kaiser.  An empirical test of models explaining research expenditures and research cooperation: evidence for the German service sector , 2002 .

[6]  Jeremy Howells,et al.  Innovation Policy in a Global Economy , 1999 .

[7]  John P. Walsh,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Links and Impacts: The Influence of Public Research on Industrial R&D , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[8]  Thomas V. Scannell,et al.  Success Factors for Integrating Suppliers into New Product Development , 1997 .

[9]  M. Nieto,et al.  The importance of diverse collaborative networks for the novelty of product innovation , 2007 .

[10]  R. Veugelers.  Collaboration in R&D: An Assessment of Theoretical and Empirical Findings , 1998 .

[11]  M. Carree,et al.  Heterogeneity in R&D cooperation strategies , 2004 .

[12]  Walter W. Powell,et al.  Networks of Innovators , 2006 .

[13]  Muge Ozman,et al.  Inter-firm networks and innovation: a survey of literature , 2009 .

[14]  C. Carrincazeaux,et al.  Proximity and localisation of corporate R&D activities , 2001 .

[15]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[16]  J. Heijs.  Identification of firms supported by technology policies: the case of Spanish low interest credits , 2005 .

[17]  S. Negassi,et al.  R&D co-operation and innovation a microeconometric study on French firms , 2004 .

[18]  A. James,et al.  The sourcing of technological knowledge: Distributed innovation processes and dynamic change , 2003 .

[19]  A. Neely,et al.  Networking and Innovation: A Systematic Review of the Evidence , 2004 .

[20]  L. Manjarrés-Henríquez,et al.  The effect of external and internal factors on firms’ product innovation , 2008 .

[21]  Ivo Zander,et al.  The formation of international innovation networks in the multinational corporation: an evolutionary perspective , 2002 .

[22]  Teresa García-Marco,et al.  Firms' motivations for cooperative R&D: an empirical analysis of Spanish firms , 2001 .

[23]  J. Howells.  Tacit Knowledge, Innovation and Economic Geography , 2002 .

[24]  O. Williamson.  Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives , 1994 .

[25]  The use of external assistance by mature SMEs in the UK: some policy implications , 1993 .

[26]  Alexander Kaufmann,et al.  Do different types of innovation rely on specific kinds of knowledge interactions , 2008 .

[27]  Alberto López,et al.  Understanding co-operative R&D activity: evidence from four European countries , 2005 .

[28]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory , 2000 .

[29]  Andrea Fosfuri,et al.  Managing External Knowledge Flows: The Moderating Role of Absorptive Capacity , 2009 .

[30]  Andrés Barge-Gil,et al.  Are Technology Institutes a Satisfactory Tool for Public Intervention in the Area of Technology? A Neoclassical and Evolutionary Evaluation , 2008 .

[31]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[32]  A. López,et al.  Determinants of R&D cooperation: Evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms , 2008 .

[33]  J. Fagerberg,et al.  The Oxford handbook of innovation , 2006 .

[34]  A. Barge-Gil,et al.  Complementarities Between Universities and Technology Institutes: New Empirical Lessons and Perspectives , 2011 .

[35]  George van Leeuwen,et al.  LINKING INNOVATION TO PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH USING TWO WAVES OF CIS 1 , 2001 .

[36]  Alfred Kleinknecht,et al.  Why do firms cooperate on R&D? an empirical study , 1992 .

[37]  Michael L. Katz,et al.  An Analysis of Cooperative Research and Development , 1986 .

[38]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: A research agenda , 2006 .

[39]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[40]  Mariko Sakakibara,et al.  HETEROGENEITY OF FIRM CAPABILITIES AND COOPERATIVE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT: AN EMPIRICAL EXAMINATION OF MOTIVES , 1997 .

[41]  Bernard Haudeville,et al.  Innovation, collaboration and SMEs internal research capacities , 2002 .

[42]  B. Tether.  Who co-operates for innovation, and why: An empirical analysis , 2002 .

[43]  John Bessant,et al.  Strategic planning in Research and Technology Institutes , 1998 .

[44]  Kenneth W. Koput,et al.  A Chaotic Model of Innovative Search: Some Answers, Many Questions , 1997 .

[45]  R. Veugelers,et al.  COMPLEMENTARITY BETWEEN TECHNOLOGY MAKE AND BUY IN INNOVATION STRATEGIES : EVIDENCE FROM BELGIAN MANUFACTURING FIRMS , 1998 .

[46]  David C. Mowery,et al.  Improving the effectiveness of public-private R&D collaboration: case studies at a US weapons laboratory , 1998 .

[47]  Mark Dodgson,et al.  The Handbook of Industrial Innovation , 1994 .

[48]  G. Hamel.  Competition for competence and interpartner learning within international strategic alliances , 1991 .

[49]  R. Katila,et al.  SOMETHING OLD, SOMETHING NEW: A LONGITUDINAL STUDY OF SEARCH BEHAVIOR AND NEW PRODUCT INTRODUCTION , 2002 .

[50]  Johan Lambrecht,et al.  An evaluation of public support measures for private external consultancies to SMEs in the Walloon Region of Belgium , 2005 .

[51]  M. Freel,et al.  External linkages and product innovation in small manufacturing firms , 2000 .

[52]  G. Calabrese,et al.  Traditional SMEs and innovation: the role of the industrial policy in Italy , 2001 .

[53]  O. Granstrand,et al.  Multi-Technology Corporations: Why They Have “Distributed” Rather Than “Distinctive Core” Competencies , 1997 .

[54]  Jacques Silber,et al.  Measurement and Determinants , 2010 .

[55]  Michael Fritsch,et al.  Who cooperates on R&D? , 2001 .

[56]  J. Howells.  Innovation systems and policy in a global economy , 2000 .

[57]  Josef Johannes Heijs.  Efectividad de las políticas de innovación en el fomento de la cooperación , 2002 .

[58]  K. Pavitt,et al.  Knowledge Specialization, Organizational Coupling, and the Boundaries of the Firm: Why Do Firms Know More than They Make? , 2001 .

[59]  Mark Dodgson,et al.  External Linkages and Innovation in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises , 1991 .

[60]  R. Narula,et al.  Innovating through strategic alliances: moving towards international partnerships and contractual agreements , 1999 .

[61]  M. Porter.  Competition in Global Industries , 1986 .

[62]  M. Mazzanti,et al.  What Drives (or Hampers) Outsourcing? Evidence for a Local Production System in Emilia Romagna , 2009 .

[63]  Andrés Barge-Gil,et al.  The impact of research and technology organizations on firm competitiveness. Measurement and determinants , 2011 .

[64]  A. Salter,et al.  Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms , 2006 .

[65]  J. Hagedoorn.  Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: Nterorganizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences , 1993 .

[66]  H. Hirsch-Kreinsen.  “Low‐Tech” Innovations , 2008 .

[67]  M. Perkmann,et al.  University Industry Relationships and Open Innovation: Towards a Research Agenda , 2007 .

[68]  D. Teece.  Competition, Cooperation, and Innovation Organizational Arrangements for Regimes of Rapid Technological Progress , 1992 .

[69]  Michaela Trippl,et al.  Innovation in knowledge intensive industries: The nature and geography of knowledge links , 2006 .

[70]  Réjean Landry,et al.  Sources of information as determinants of novelty of innovation in manufacturing firms: evidence from the 1999 statistics Canada innovation survey , 2005 .

[71]  Bruce Tether,et al.  Beyond industry–university links: Sourcing knowledge for innovation from consultants, private research organisations and the public science-base , 2008 .

[72]  Wolfgang Becker,et al.  R&D cooperation and innovation activities of firms—evidence for the German manufacturing industry , 2004 .

[73]  Toby E. Stuart.  Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: A study of growth and innovation rates i , 2000 .

[74]  Mark Dodgson,et al.  The strategic management of R&D collaboration , 1992 .

[75]  Alan MacPherson,et al.  The Role of Contact Requirements in Producer Services Location , 2000 .

[76]  J. Heckman.  The Common Structure of Statistical Models of Truncation, Sample Selection and Limited Dependent Variables and a Simple Estimator for Such Models , 1976 .

[77]  Silvia Massa,et al.  Innovation and SMEs: Misaligned perspectives and goals among entrepreneurs, academics, and policy makers , 2008 .

[78]  M. Carree,et al.  Cooperative R&D and Firm Performance , 2004 .

[79]  V. Chiesa,et al.  The Open Innovation Journey: How firms dynamically implement the emerging innovation management paradigm , 2011 .

[80]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D , 1989 .

[81]  Fr¬¥ed¬¥erique Sachwald,et al.  Co-operative R&D: why and with whom?: An integrated framework of analysis , 2003 .

[82]  Yannis Caloghirou,et al.  Internal capabilities and external knowledge sources: complements or substitutes for innovative performance? , 2004 .

[83]  Daniele Archibugi,et al.  The policy implications of the globalisation of innovation , 1999 .

[84]  D. Webber,et al.  Which SMEs Use External Business Advice? A Multivariate Subregional Study , 2007 .

[85]  Bart Clarysse,et al.  Building absorptive capacity to organise inbound open innovation in traditional industries , 2010 .

[86]  Ray Oakey,et al.  New Technology-Based Firms in the 1990s , 2007 .

[87]  Bettina Peters,et al.  Firm Level Innovation and Productivity - is There a Common Story Across Countries? , 2003 .

[88]  A. Jacquemin,et al.  Cooperative and Noncooperative R&D in Duopoly with Spillovers , 1988 .

[89]  J. West,et al.  Open innovation : researching a new paradigm , 2008 .

[90]  S. Zeng,et al.  Relationship between cooperation networks and innovation performance of SMEs , 2010 .

[91]  R. Narula.  R&D Collaboration by SMEs: new opportunities and limitations in the face of globalisation , 2004 .

[92]  A. Arora,et al.  Markets for Technology and Their Implications for Corporate Strategy , 2000 .

[93]  Jong de Jpj,et al.  Open innovation in SMEs : trends, motives and management challenges , 2009 .

[94]  M. Mol,et al.  Does Being R&D Intensive Still Discourage Outsourcing? Evidence from Dutch Manufacturing , 2005 .

[95]  Jeroen P.J. de Jong,et al.  Market novelty, competence-seeking and innovation networking , 2009 .

[96]  J. C. F. D. Arroyabe,et al.  The choice of partners in R&D cooperation: An empirical analysis of Spanish firms , 2008 .

[97]  H. Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: A New Paradigm for Understanding Industrial Innovation , 2006 .

[98]  J. Hagedoorn.  Inter-firm R&D partnerships: an overview of major trends and patterns since 1960 , 2002 .

[99]  Aoife Hanley,et al.  A tale of two literatures: Transaction costs and property rights in innovation outsourcing , 2007 .

[100]  R. Veugelers,et al.  R&D Cooperation and Spillovers: Some Empirical Evidence , 1998 .

[101]  Patrick Waelbroeck,et al.  Assessing spillovers from universities to firms: evidence from French firm-level data , 2003 .

[102]  T. S. Robertson,et al.  TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT MODE: A TRANSACTION COST CONCEPTUALIZATION , 1998 .

[103]  Kevin Morgan,et al.  The Regional Innovation Paradox: Innovation Policy and Industrial Policy , 2002 .

[104]  Alberto López,et al.  Understanding co-operative innovative activity: evidence from four European countries , 2009 .

[105]  Paul Israel,et al.  The Sources of Innovation , 1990 .

[106]  Orietta Marsili,et al.  The fruit flies of innovations: A taxonomy of innovative small firms , 2006 .