Large scale free energy calculations for blind predictions of protein–ligand binding: the D3R Grand Challenge 2015

Abstract We describe binding free energy calculations in the D3R Grand Challenge 2015 for blind prediction of the binding affinities of 180 ligands to Hsp90. The present D3R challenge was built around experimental datasets involving Heat shock protein (Hsp) 90, an ATP-dependent molecular chaperone which is an important anticancer drug target. The Hsp90 ATP binding site is known to be a challenging target for accurate calculations of ligand binding affinities because of the ligand-dependent conformational changes in the binding site, the presence of ordered waters and the broad chemical diversity of ligands that can bind at this site. Our primary focus here is to distinguish binders from nonbinders. Large scale absolute binding free energy calculations that cover over 3000 protein–ligand complexes were performed using the BEDAM method starting from docked structures generated by Glide docking. Although the ligand dataset in this study resembles an intermediate to late stage lead optimization project while the BEDAM method is mainly developed for early stage virtual screening of hit molecules, the BEDAM binding free energy scoring has resulted in a moderate enrichment of ligand screening against this challenging drug target. Results show that, using a statistical mechanics based free energy method like BEDAM starting from docked poses offers better enrichment than classical docking scoring functions and rescoring methods like Prime MM-GBSA for the Hsp90 data set in this blind challenge. Importantly, among the three methods tested here, only the mean value of the BEDAM binding free energy scores is able to separate the large group of binders from the small group of nonbinders with a gap of 2.4 kcal/mol. None of the three methods that we have tested provided accurate ranking of the affinities of the 147 active compounds. We discuss the possible sources of errors in the binding free energy calculations. The study suggests that BEDAM can be used strategically to discriminate binders from nonbinders in virtual screening and to more accurately predict the ligand binding modes prior to the more computationally expensive FEP calculations of binding affinity.

[1]  Araz Jakalian,et al.  Fast, efficient generation of high‐quality atomic charges. AM1‐BCC model: I. Method , 2000 .

[2]  R. Friesner,et al.  Evaluation and Reparametrization of the OPLS-AA Force Field for Proteins via Comparison with Accurate Quantum Chemical Calculations on Peptides† , 2001 .

[3]  B. Berne,et al.  Replica exchange with solute scaling: a more efficient version of replica exchange with solute tempering (REST2). , 2011, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[4]  Arthur J. Olson,et al.  Distinguishing Binders from False Positives by Free Energy Calculations: Fragment Screening Against the Flap Site of HIV Protease , 2014, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[5]  M. Gilson,et al.  The statistical-thermodynamic basis for computation of binding affinities: a critical review. , 1997, Biophysical journal.

[6]  M. Gilson,et al.  Free energy, entropy, and induced fit in host-guest recognition: calculations with the second-generation mining minima algorithm. , 2004, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[7]  Peng Zhang,et al.  Elucidating the energetics of entropically driven protein-ligand association: calculations of absolute binding free energy and entropy. , 2011, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[8]  Emilio Gallicchio,et al.  The AGBNP2 Implicit Solvation Model. , 2009, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[9]  Jie Zhu,et al.  BEDAM binding free energy predictions for the SAMPL4 octa-acid host challenge , 2015, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design.

[10]  Ronald M. Levy,et al.  AGBNP: An analytic implicit solvent model suitable for molecular dynamics simulations and high‐resolution modeling , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[11]  Stefan Boresch,et al.  Absolute Binding Free Energies: A Quantitative Approach for Their Calculation , 2003 .

[12]  Daniel Cappel,et al.  Accurate Binding Free Energy Predictions in Fragment Optimization , 2015, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[13]  Kamran Haider,et al.  Combining Solvent Thermodynamic Profiles with Functionality Maps of the Hsp90 Binding Site to Predict the Displacement of Water Molecules , 2013, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[14]  John B. Shoven,et al.  I , Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal.

[15]  Gianni Chessari,et al.  Fragment-based drug discovery applied to Hsp90. Discovery of two lead series with high ligand efficiency. , 2010, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[16]  Benoît Roux,et al.  Calculation of Standard Binding Free Energies:  Aromatic Molecules in the T4 Lysozyme L99A Mutant. , 2006, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[17]  Arthur J. Olson,et al.  Virtual screening of integrase inhibitors by large scale binding free energy calculations: the SAMPL4 challenge , 2014, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design.

[18]  Emilio Gallicchio,et al.  The Binding Energy Distribution Analysis Method (BEDAM) for the Estimation of Protein-Ligand Binding Affinities. , 2010, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[19]  Junmei Wang,et al.  Development and testing of a general amber force field , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[20]  R. Levy,et al.  Binding Energy Distribution Analysis Method: Hamiltonian Replica Exchange with Torsional Flattening for Binding Mode Prediction and Binding Free Energy Estimation. , 2016, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[21]  Ronald M. Levy,et al.  Prediction of SAMPL3 host-guest affinities with the binding energy distribution analysis method (BEDAM) , 2012, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design.

[22]  B. Roux,et al.  Computations of standard binding free energies with molecular dynamics simulations. , 2009, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[23]  Jennifer L. Knight,et al.  Accurate and reliable prediction of relative ligand binding potency in prospective drug discovery by way of a modern free-energy calculation protocol and force field. , 2015, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[24]  Shuai Liu,et al.  Blind prediction of HIV integrase binding from the SAMPL4 challenge , 2014, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design.

[25]  W. L. Jorgensen,et al.  Development and Testing of the OPLS All-Atom Force Field on Conformational Energetics and Properties of Organic Liquids , 1996 .

[26]  R. Dror,et al.  Improved side-chain torsion potentials for the Amber ff99SB protein force field , 2010, Proteins.