Incidence, Origin, and Predictive Model for the Detection and Clinical Management of Segmental Aneuploidies in Human Embryos.

[1]  F. Spinella,et al.  Clinical outcomes after the transfer of blastocysts characterized as mosaic by high resolution Next Generation Sequencing- further insights. , 2020, European journal of medical genetics.

[2]  Ivan Vogel,et al.  SureTypeSC - a Random Forest and Gaussian mixture predictor of high confidence genotypes in single-cell data , 2019, Bioinform..

[3]  Karen H. Miga,et al.  Human chromosome‐specific aneuploidy is influenced by DNA‐dependent centromeric features , 2019, The EMBO journal.

[4]  A. Capalbo.  Careful and expert interpretation of PGT-A data can resolve the mosaicism dilemma. , 2019, Human reproduction.

[5]  V. Peinado,et al.  Segmental aneuploidy in human blastocysts: a qualitative and quantitative overview , 2019, Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology.

[6]  B. Lawrenz,et al.  The clinicians´ dilemma with mosaicism-an insight from inner cell mass biopsies. , 2019, Human reproduction.

[7]  C. Rubio,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies. , 2019, Fertility and sterility.

[8]  K. Vesela,et al.  Incidence and origin of meiotic whole and segmental chromosomal aneuploidies detected by karyomapping. , 2019, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[9]  V. Peinado,et al.  Clinical application of embryo aneuploidy testing by next-generation sequencing , 2019, Biology of Reproduction.

[10]  D. Griffin,et al.  Assessment of aneuploidy concordance between clinical trophectoderm biopsy and blastocyst , 2018, Human reproduction.

[11]  D. Wells,et al.  The cytogenetic constitution of human blastocysts: insights from comprehensive chromosome screening strategies , 2018, Human reproduction update.

[12]  G. Lu,et al.  Prevalence and authenticity of de-novo segmental aneuploidy (>16 Mb) in human blastocysts as detected by next-generation sequencing. , 2018, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[13]  Shee-Uan Chen,et al.  Concordance between different trophectoderm biopsy sites and the inner cell mass of chromosomal composition measured with a next-generation sequencing platform , 2018, Molecular human reproduction.

[14]  L. Rienzi,et al.  Inconclusive chromosomal assessment after blastocyst biopsy: prevalence, causative factors and outcomes after re-biopsy and re-vitrification. A multicenter experience , 2018, Human reproduction.

[15]  B. Menten,et al.  Chromosomal mosaicism in human blastocysts: the ultimate challenge of preimplantation genetic testing? , 2018, Human reproduction.

[16]  D. Wells,et al.  The incidence and origin of segmental aneuploidy in human oocytes and preimplantation embryos , 2017, Human reproduction.

[17]  L. Rienzi,et al.  Human female meiosis revised: new insights into the mechanisms of chromosome segregation and aneuploidies from advanced genomics and time-lapse imaging , 2017, Human reproduction update.

[18]  D. Wells,et al.  Detailed investigation into the cytogenetic constitution and pregnancy outcome of replacing mosaic blastocysts detected with the use of high-resolution next-generation sequencing. , 2017, Fertility and sterility.

[19]  L. Rienzi,et al.  Mosaicism between trophectoderm and inner cell mass. , 2017, Fertility and sterility.

[20]  Shee-Uan Chen,et al.  Identification of mosaic and segmental aneuploidies by next-generation sequencing in preimplantation genetic screening can improve clinical outcomes compared to array-comparative genomic hybridization , 2017, Molecular Cytogenetics.

[21]  D. Wells,et al.  Analysis of implantation and ongoing pregnancy rates following the transfer of mosaic diploid–aneuploid blastocysts , 2017, Human Genetics.

[22]  G. Simoni,et al.  Frequency of fetal karyotype abnormalities in women undergoing invasive testing in the absence of ultrasound and other high‐risk indications , 2016, Prenatal diagnosis.

[23]  N. Treff,et al.  A randomized and blinded comparison of qPCR and NGS-based detection of aneuploidy in a cell line mixture model of blastocyst biopsy mosaicism , 2016, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics.

[24]  R. Kolodner,et al.  A genetic network that suppresses genome rearrangements in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and contains defects in cancers , 2016, Nature Communications.

[25]  Alex J. Bladon,et al.  Distribution patterns of segmental aneuploidies in human blastocysts identified by next-generation sequencing. , 2016, Fertility and sterility.

[26]  L. Rienzi,et al.  Consistent and reproducible outcomes of blastocyst biopsy and aneuploidy screening across different biopsy practitioners: a multicentre study involving 2586 embryo biopsies , 2015, Human reproduction.

[27]  Lauren B Vensand,et al.  Human embryos commonly form abnormal nuclei during development: a mechanism of DNA damage, embryonic aneuploidy, and developmental arrest. , 2015, Human reproduction.

[28]  C. Izzi,et al.  Interpreting mosaicism in chorionic villi: results of a monocentric series of 1001 mosaics in chorionic villi with follow‐up amniocentesis , 2015, Prenatal diagnosis.

[29]  L. Rienzi,et al.  Comparison of array comparative genomic hybridization and quantitative real-time PCR-based aneuploidy screening of blastocyst biopsies , 2014, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[30]  Roberta Maggiulli,et al.  Correlation between standard blastocyst morphology, euploidy and implantation: an observational study in two centers involving 956 screened blastocysts. , 2014, Human reproduction.

[31]  Deanne M. Taylor,et al.  Blastocyst biopsy with comprehensive chromosome screening and fresh embryo transfer significantly increases in vitro fertilization implantation and delivery rates: a randomized controlled trial. , 2013, Fertility and sterility.

[32]  L. Rienzi,et al.  FISH reanalysis of inner cell mass and trophectoderm samples of previously array-CGH screened blastocysts shows high accuracy of diagnosis and no major diagnostic impact of mosaicism at the blastocyst stage. , 2013, Human reproduction.

[33]  Deanne M. Taylor,et al.  In vitro fertilization with single euploid blastocyst transfer: a randomized controlled trial. , 2013, Fertility and sterility.

[34]  P. Lapunzina,et al.  New microdeletion and microduplication syndromes: A comprehensive review , 2013, Genetics and molecular biology.

[35]  Yves Moreau,et al.  Genome-wide copy number profiling of single cells in S-phase reveals DNA-replication domains , 2013, Nucleic acids research.

[36]  A. Carr,et al.  Recombination-restarted replication makes inverted chromosome fusions at inverted repeats , 2012, Nature.

[37]  S. Dalton,et al.  Evolutionarily conserved replication timing profiles predict long-range chromatin interactions and distinguish closely related cell types. , 2010, Genome research.

[38]  E. Blennow,et al.  Mechanical isolation of the inner cell mass is effective in derivation of new human embryonic stem cell lines. , 2007, Human reproduction.

[39]  Kok-Lung Chan,et al.  BLM is required for faithful chromosome segregation and its localization defines a class of ultrafine anaphase bridges , 2007, The EMBO journal.

[40]  O. Hovatta.  Derivation of human embryonic stem cell lines, towards clinical quality. , 2006, Reproduction, fertility, and development.

[41]  A. Henderson.  Medical Decision Making. H. C. Sox, M. A. Blatt, M. C. Higgins, K. I. Marton. Boston: Butterworths, 1988, $24.95 (paperback). ISBN 0-409-90091-5 , 1989 .

[42]  L. Rienzi,et al.  Diagnosis and clinical management of duplications and deletions. , 2017, Fertility and sterility.

[43]  G. Chapman,et al.  [Medical decision making]. , 1976, Lakartidningen.