Cohort profile: the International Childhood Cancer Cohort Consortium (I4C).

Globally, a number of large infant/child prospective studies have been launched to examine environmental and genetic determinants of common diseases of children, such as asthma, developmental delay and behaviour abnormalities, as well as the consequences of early exposure for adult diseases. While several of these studies are relatively very large—over 100 000 subjects—and are adequately powered to examine their principal outcomes of interest, none of the individual studies are of sufficient size to examine the relationship between exposures they are measuring and rare diseases such as childhood cancer. To date, the few established risk factors for specific forms of childhood cancer have largely been identified in case-control studies. Yet, despite many such investigations evaluating postulated risk factors for paediatric malignancies during the past five decades, few consistently established aetiologic factors are known. Recent review papers have summarized many promising hypotheses, including pre-natal and post-natal exposure to pesticides, maternal and early infancy dietary factors, paternal pre-conception occupational exposures and smoking, the interplay of maternal or early postnatal immune system handling of common infections, determinants of high birth weight and other factors. Employment of prospective cohort follow-up of children and adolescents from pregnancy or birth using cohort or nested case-cohort designs, in conjunction with prospective biological sample collection, offers promising opportunities for advancing knowledge of aetiology. This is a result of improved assessment of parental and early life exposures, measurement of biological samples for pre-diagnostic effects, clarification of the temporal relationship between exposure and outcome, reduction of differential recall between parents of cases vs controls and the prospect of understanding the determinants of selection bias. The concept of bringing the various cohorts of infants and children together in an international collaboration arose during planning for the National Children’s Study (NCS), a childhood cohort study in the United States of 100 000 participants. Participants at a 2004 workshop convened to consider whether this cohort would be of sufficient size to include cancer as a feasible outcome; they concluded that this study would have insufficient power for this purpose due to the rarity of all forms of childhood cancer. However, a collaboration of the existing and planned large childhood cohorts globally might provide the power necessary to obtain prospective evidence on potential causes of childhood cancer. This idea was developed further and a proposal was presented to the National Institute for Child Health and Human Development (NICHD), National Cancer Institute (NCI) and the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Along with funding support from the National Institute of Health’s Office of Rare Diseases, these organizations held a workshop in 2005, bringing together representatives from 11 cohorts in four continents, accounting for 700 000 children (Table 1), as well as experts in epidemiology, paediatric oncology, genetics, toxicology and other disciplines. Its purpose * Corresponding author. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Center for Environmental Assessment, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, 8623D, Washington, DC, 20460 USA. E-mail: brown.rebecca@epa.gov 1 National Center for Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA. 2 Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia. 3 National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, MD, USA. 4 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, MD, USA. 5 National Center for Maternal and Infant Health, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China. 6 Department of Epidemiology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. The online version of this article has been published under an open access model. Users are entitled to use, reproduce, disseminate, or display the open access version of this article for non-commercial purposes provided that: the original authorship is properly and fully attributed; the Journal and Oxford University Press are attributed as the original place of publication with the correct citation details given; if an article is subsequently reproduced or disseminated not in its entirety but only in part or as a derivative work this must be clearly indicated. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association The Author 2007; all rights reserved. Advance Access publication 25 January 2007 International Journal of Epidemiology 2007;36:724–730 doi:10.1093/ije/dyl299

[1]  Kimberly J. Johnson,et al.  Parental Age and Risk of Childhood Cancer: A Pooled Analysis , 2009, Epidemiology.

[2]  National Children’s Study , 2009, AAP News.

[3]  K. Czene,et al.  Parental age and risk of childhood cancers: a population-based cohort study from Sweden. , 2006, International journal of epidemiology.

[4]  David Laniado,et al.  The Risk of Cancer following Hospitalization for Infection in Infancy: A Population-Based Cohort Study , 2006, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[5]  P. Magnus,et al.  Cohort profile: the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study (MoBa). , 2006, International journal of epidemiology.

[6]  L. Anderson Environmental genotoxicants/carcinogens and childhood cancer: bridgeable gaps in scientific knowledge. , 2006, Mutation research.

[7]  A. Tardón,et al.  Child health and the environment: the INMA Spanish Study. , 2006, Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology.

[8]  Rebecca C. Brown Review: Windows of exposure to pesticides for increased risk of childhood leukemia , 2006 .

[9]  S. Selvin,et al.  Parental smoking and the risk of childhood leukemia. , 2006, American journal of epidemiology.

[10]  R. Albertini,et al.  The Use of Biomonitoring Data in Exposure and Human Health Risk Assessments , 2006, Environmental health perspectives.

[11]  G. Mezei,et al.  Selection bias and its implications for case-control studies: a case study of magnetic field exposure and childhood leukaemia. , 2006, International journal of epidemiology.

[12]  M. Loriot,et al.  Childhood leukaemia, polymorphisms of metabolism enzyme genes, and interactions with maternal tobacco, coffee and alcohol consumption during pregnancy , 2005, European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation.

[13]  R. Brand,et al.  Nonresponse Bias in a Follow-up Study of 19-Year-Old Adolescents Born as Preterm Infants , 2005, Pediatrics.

[14]  M. Ledrans,et al.  INTEGRATING RESEARCH AND SURVEILLANCE ACTIVITIES IN A NATIONAL ACTION PLAN: THE EFESE BIRTH COHORT PROJECT AND THE FRENCH NEHAP , 2005 .

[15]  C. Skibola,et al.  Molecular biomarkers for the study of childhood leukemia. , 2005, Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology.

[16]  Paolo Vineis,et al.  Design Options for Molecular Epidemiology Research within Cohort Studies , 2005, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[17]  Fred R. Dee,et al.  Alcohol consumption and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a pooled analysis. , 2005, The Lancet. Oncology.

[18]  Fred R. Dee,et al.  Cigarette Smoking and Risk of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Pooled Analysis from the International Lymphoma Epidemiology Consortium (InterLymph) , 2005, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[19]  M. Greaves In utero origins of childhood leukaemia. , 2005, Early human development.

[20]  Leeka Kheifets,et al.  Childhood leukemia and EMF: Review of the epidemiologic evidence , 2005, Bioelectromagnetics.

[21]  M. Kogevinas,et al.  Collaboration is needed to co-ordinate European birth cohort studies. , 2004, International journal of epidemiology.

[22]  R. McNally,et al.  An infectious aetiology for childhood acute leukaemia: a review of the evidence , 2004, British journal of haematology.

[23]  C. Stiller Epidemiology and genetics of childhood cancer , 2004, Oncogene.

[24]  J. Ray Folic acid food fortification in Canada. , 2004, Nutrition reviews.

[25]  C. McHale,et al.  Prenatal origin of chromosomal translocations in acute childhood leukemia: Implications and future directions , 2004, American journal of hematology.

[26]  D. Labuda,et al.  Role of MTHFR genetic polymorphisms in the susceptibility to childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. , 2004, Blood.

[27]  J. Kleinjans,et al.  Children and Increased Susceptibility to Environmental Carcinogens , 2003 .

[28]  J. Kleinjans,et al.  Children and increased susceptibility to environmental carcinogens: evidence or empathy? , 2003, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[29]  M. Melbye,et al.  Birth weight as a risk factor for childhood leukemia: a meta-analysis of 18 epidemiologic studies. , 2003, American journal of epidemiology.

[30]  J. Ross,et al.  Bias in studies of parental self-reported occupational exposure and childhood cancer. , 2003, American journal of epidemiology.

[31]  G. Koren,et al.  Folic acid food fortification is associated with a decline in neuroblastoma , 2003, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[32]  D. Chowdary,et al.  High incidence of two methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase mutations (C677T and A1298C) in Hispanics. , 2003, Genetic testing.

[33]  M. Greaves,et al.  Origins of chromosome translocations in childhood leukaemia , 2003, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[34]  Lee-Yang Wong,et al.  A population-based birth defects surveillance system in the People's Republic of China. , 2003, Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology.

[35]  S. Wacholder,et al.  Interpreting epidemiologic research: lessons from studies of childhood cancer. , 2003, Pediatrics.

[36]  M. Longnecker,et al.  The National Children's Study of environmental effects on child health and development. , 2003, Environmental health perspectives.

[37]  M. Caudill,et al.  Heterogeneity in the prevalence of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene polymorphisms in women of different ethnic groups. , 2003, Journal of the American Dietetic Association.

[38]  W. P. Glezen,et al.  Why no effect of maternal respiratory syncytial virus-neutralizing antibody? , 2003, Pediatrics.

[39]  Y. Ikeda,et al.  The frequent 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T polymorphism is associated with a common haplotype in whites, Japanese, and Africans. , 2002, American journal of human genetics.

[40]  A. Gavin,et al.  Association of early life factors and acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in childhood: historical cohort study , 2002, British Journal of Cancer.

[41]  B. Armstrong,et al.  Maternal folate supplementation in pregnancy and protection against acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in childhood: a case-control study , 2001, The Lancet.

[42]  G. Draper,et al.  Case-control study of parental age, parity and socioeconomic level in relation to childhood cancers. , 2001, International journal of epidemiology.

[43]  Henrik Toft Sørensen,et al.  The Danish National Birth Cohort - its background, structure and aim , 2001, Scandinavian journal of public health.

[44]  D. Savitz Environmental exposures and childhood cancer: our best may not be good enough. , 2001, American journal of public health.

[45]  G. M. Taylor,et al.  Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) polymorphisms and risk of molecularly defined subtypes of childhood acute leukemia , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[46]  M. Pembrey,et al.  ALSPAC--the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children. I. Study methodology. , 2001, Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology.

[47]  C. Weinberg,et al.  Menstrual and reproductive risk factors for ischemic heart disease. , 1999, Epidemiology.

[48]  P. Kyyrönen,et al.  Parental age as a risk factor of childhood leukemia and brain cancer in offspring. , 1999, Epidemiology.

[49]  J H Lubin,et al.  Power and sample size calculations in case-control studies of gene-environment interactions: comments on different approaches. , 1999, American journal of epidemiology.

[50]  S. Wacholder,et al.  Paternal cigarette smoking and the risk of childhood cancer among offspring of nonsmoking mothers. , 1997, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[51]  T. Dwyer,et al.  A comparison of prospective and retrospective responses on sudden infant death syndrome by case and control mothers. , 1993, American journal of epidemiology.

[52]  T. Dwyer,et al.  Prospective cohort study of prone sleeping position and sudden infant death syndrome , 1991, The Lancet.

[53]  A. Fleming,et al.  Childhood leukaemia , 1991, The Lancet.

[54]  A. Bener,et al.  Parental smoking and the risk of childhood asthma. , 1991, The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma.

[55]  S. Corkin,et al.  Parental age as a risk factor in Alzheimer's disease , 1983, Annals of neurology.

[56]  S. Harlap,et al.  The Jerusalem perinatal study: the first decade 1964--73. , 1977, Israel journal of medical sciences.

[57]  B. Tzur,et al.  The Jerusalem perinatal study. 1. Design and organization of a continuing, community-based, record-linked survey. , 1969, Israel journal of medical sciences.