Membrane locking in discrete shell theories

This work is concerned with the study of thin structures in Computational Mechanics. This field is particularly interesting, since together with traditional finite elements methods (FEM), the last years have seen the development of a new approach, called discrete differential geometry (DDG). The idea of FEM is to approximate smooth solutions using polynomials, providing error estimates that establish convergence in the limit of mesh refinement. The natural language of this field has been found in the formalism of functional analysis. On the contrary, DDG considers discrete entities, e.g., the mesh, as the only physical system to be studied and discrete theories are being formulated from first principles. In particular, DDG is concerned with the preservation of smooth properties that break down in the discrete setting with FEM. While the core of traditional FEM is based on function interpolation, usually in Hilbert spaces, discrete theories have an intrinsic physical interpretation, independently from the smooth solutions they converge to. This approach is related to flexible multibody dynamics and finite volumes. In this work, we focus on the phenomenon of membrane locking, which produces a severe artificial rigidity in discrete thin structures. In the case of FEM, locking arises from a poor choice of finite subspaces where to look for solutions, while in the DDG case, it arises from arbitrary definitions of discrete geometric quantities. In particular, we underline that a given mesh, or a given finite subspace, are not the physical system of interest, but a representation of it, out of infinitely many. In this work, we use this observation and combine tools from FEM and DDG, in order to build a novel discrete shell theory, free of membrane locking.

[1]  Eitan Grinspun,et al.  Computing discrete shape operators on general meshes , 2006, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[2]  Douglas N. Arnold,et al.  Locking-free finite element methods for shells , 1997, Math. Comput..

[3]  Raph Levien,et al.  The elastica: a mathematical history , 2008 .

[4]  Daniele Trimarchi,et al.  The use of shell elements to capture sail wrinkles, and their influence on aerodynamic loads , 2010 .

[5]  J. C. Simo,et al.  On stress resultant geometrically exact shell model. Part I: formulation and optimal parametrization , 1989 .

[6]  P. Steinmann,et al.  On a solution strategy for energy-based mesh optimization in finite hyperelastostatics , 2008 .

[7]  Eugenio Oñate Ibáñez de Navarra,et al.  A simple triangular element for thick and thin plate and shell analysis , 1993 .

[8]  M. Ortiz,et al.  Subdivision surfaces: a new paradigm for thin‐shell finite‐element analysis , 2000 .

[9]  Eitan Grinspun,et al.  A quadratic bending model for inextensible surfaces , 2006, SGP '06.

[10]  K. Y. Sze,et al.  Popular benchmark problems for geometric nonlinear analysis of shells , 2004 .

[11]  J. Thompson,et al.  Experiments on snap buckling, hysteresis and loop formation in twisted rods , 2005 .

[12]  Douglas N. Arnold,et al.  A Family of Discontinuous Galerkin Finite Elements for the Reissner–Mindlin Plate , 2005, J. Sci. Comput..

[13]  Michel Fortin,et al.  Mixed Finite Elements, Compatibility Conditions, and Applications , 2008 .

[14]  Reinhard Scholz A mixed method for 4th order problems using linear finite elements , 1978 .

[15]  J. Marsden,et al.  Structure-preserving discretization of incompressible fluids , 2009, 0912.3989.

[16]  Eitan Grinspun,et al.  A Discrete Model for Inelastic Deformation of Thin Shells , 2004 .

[17]  Raanan Fattal,et al.  Efficient simulation of inextensible cloth , 2007, SIGGRAPH 2007.

[18]  Robert L. Taylor,et al.  A triangular element based on Reissner‐Mindlin plate theory , 1990 .

[19]  S. Timoshenko,et al.  THEORY OF PLATES AND SHELLS , 1959 .

[20]  K. Bletzinger,et al.  Efficient sub-grid scale modeling of membrane wrinkling by a projection method , 2009 .

[21]  R. S. Falk Nonconforming finite element methods for the equations of linear elasticity , 1991 .

[22]  V. L. Berdichevskiĭ Variational principles of continuum mechanics , 2009 .

[23]  Jörn Mosler,et al.  On the numerical implementation of variational arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian (VALE) formulations , 2006, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering.

[24]  G. M.,et al.  A Treatise on the Mathematical Theory of Elasticity , 1906, Nature.

[25]  F. van Keulen,et al.  REFINED CONSISTENT FORMULATION OF A CURVED TRIANGULAR FINITE ROTATION SHELL ELEMENT , 1996 .

[26]  Klaus-Jürgen Bathe,et al.  A study of three‐node triangular plate bending elements , 1980 .

[27]  Sean S. Hardesty,et al.  Optimization of shell structure acoustics , 2010 .

[28]  D. Arnold,et al.  A uniformly accurate finite element method for the Reissner-Mindlin plate , 1989 .

[29]  Michel Fortin,et al.  Mixed and Hybrid Finite Element Methods , 2011, Springer Series in Computational Mathematics.

[30]  Anil N. Hirani,et al.  Discrete exterior calculus , 2005, math/0508341.

[31]  C. Felippa A study of optimal membrane triangles with drilling freedoms , 2003 .

[32]  Jerrold E. Marsden,et al.  Variational Integrators for Maxwell's Equations with Sources , 2008, 0803.2070.

[33]  Robert Bridson,et al.  Animating developable surfaces using nonconforming elements , 2008, SIGGRAPH 2008.

[34]  Thomas J. R. Hughes,et al.  Isogeometric shell analysis: The Reissner-Mindlin shell , 2010 .

[35]  Ted Belytschko,et al.  A simple triangular curved shell element , 1984 .

[36]  Jerrold E. Marsden,et al.  Variational r‐adaption in elastodynamics , 2008 .

[37]  J. C. Simo,et al.  Geometrically non‐linear enhanced strain mixed methods and the method of incompatible modes , 1992 .

[38]  Daniel Choi,et al.  Membrane locking in the finite element computation of very thin elastic shells , 1998 .

[39]  Gunnar Tibert,et al.  A Comparison of Rotation-Free Triangular Shell Elements for Unstructured Meshes , 2007 .

[40]  Renato Vitaliani,et al.  Simulation of light‐weight membrane structures by wrinkling model , 2005 .

[41]  J. Mosler A novel variational algorithmic formulation for wrinkling at finite strains based on energy minimization: Application to mesh adaption , 2008 .

[42]  B. O'neill Elementary Differential Geometry , 1966 .

[43]  K. Bathe,et al.  Fundamental considerations for the finite element analysis of shell structures , 1998 .

[44]  Johan Hoffman,et al.  Blow up of incompressible Euler solutions , 2008 .

[45]  C. R. Calladine,et al.  A simple class of finite elements for plate and shell problems. I - Elements for beams and thin flat plates. II - An element for thin shells, with only translational degrees of freedom , 1992 .

[46]  M. Ortiz,et al.  A variational r‐adaption and shape‐optimization method for finite‐deformation elasticity , 2004 .

[47]  Nam-Ho Kim Introduction to Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis , 2014 .

[48]  E. Grinspun,et al.  Discrete elastic rods , 2008, SIGGRAPH 2008.