Explorer The BIG 2 . 04 MRC / EORTC SUPREMO Trial-Pathology quality assurance of a large phase 3 randomised international clinical trial of postmastectomy radiotherapy in intermediate-risk breast cancer
暂无分享,去创建一个
G. Tienhoven | D. Cameron | I. Kunkler | P. Canney | T. Piper | N. Anderson | N. Russell | A. Hanby | J. Thomas | J. Bartlett | C. Cunningham | K. Riddle
[1] J. Cintolo-Gonzalez,et al. Multidisciplinary Tumor Boards in Dermatologic Surgery. , 2019, Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.].
[2] Ian O Ellis,et al. Review of the national external quality assessment (EQA) scheme for breast pathology in the UK , 2016, Journal of Clinical Pathology.
[3] S. Pinder,et al. Addressing overtreatment of screen detected DCIS; the LORIS trial. , 2015, European journal of cancer.
[4] C. Caldas,et al. Efficacy of neoadjuvant bevacizumab added to docetaxel followed by fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide, for women with HER2-negative early breast cancer (ARTemis): an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. , 2015, The Lancet. Oncology.
[5] J. Elmore,et al. Diagnostic concordance among pathologists interpreting breast biopsy specimens. , 2015, JAMA.
[6] M. Teare,et al. Comparison of Nottingham Prognostic Index and Adjuvant Online prognostic tools in young women with breast cancer: review of a single-institution experience , 2015, BMJ Open.
[7] Donald L Weaver,et al. Understanding diagnostic variability in breast pathology: lessons learned from an expert consensus review panel , 2014, Histopathology.
[8] I. Ellis,et al. The prognostic significance of lymphovascular invasion in invasive breast carcinoma , 2012, Cancer.
[9] Mark A Helvie,et al. Changes in surgical management resulting from case review at a breast cancer multidisciplinary tumor board , 2006, Cancer.
[10] R W Blamey,et al. Prognostic value of lymphovascular invasion in women with lymph node negative invasive breast carcinoma. , 2006, European journal of cancer.
[11] Hanina Hibshoosh,et al. Interobserver agreement and reproducibility in classification of invasive breast carcinoma: an NCI breast cancer family registry study , 2006, Modern Pathology.
[12] C. Giardina,et al. Prognostic factors in breast cancer: the predictive value of the Nottingham Prognostic Index in patients with a long-term follow-up that were treated in a single institution. , 2001, European journal of cancer.
[13] N. Dallimore,et al. Consistency in the observation of features used to classify duct carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast , 2000, Journal of clinical pathology.
[14] L. Tabár,et al. 10-Year results after sector resection with or without postoperative radiotherapy for stage I breast cancer: a randomized trial. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[15] R. Blamey,et al. A prognostic index in primary breast cancer. , 1982, British Journal of Cancer.
[16] I. Ellis,et al. Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. , 2002, Histopathology.
[17] J. Coindre,et al. Obvious peritumoral emboli: an elusive prognostic factor reappraised. Multivariate analysis of 1320 node-negative breast cancers. , 1998, European journal of cancer.