Influence of imaging on clinical decision making in the treatment of lower back pain.

PURPOSE To assess the impact of cross-sectional imaging with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging or computed tomography (CT) on clinical decision making for patients with lower back pain (LBP). MATERIALS AND METHODS A randomized controlled before-and-after study was performed in 145 patients who had symptomatic lumbar spinal disorders and had been referred to orthopedists or neurosurgeons. Participants were a subgroup within a multicenter pragmatic randomized comparison of two imaging policies on LBP treatment: "imaging" versus "no imaging," unless a clear indication developed. Paired assessments were made of diagnosis, diagnostic confidence, proposed treatment, treatment confidence at trial entry and follow-up, and expectations of imaging. Data were analyzed according to the groups as randomized. RESULTS At follow-up, there were no statistically significant differences between the groups with respect to diagnosis or treatment plans. Significant increases in diagnostic and therapeutic confidence between trial entry and follow-up were observed for both groups, with a significantly greater increase in diagnostic confidence (P =.01) in the imaging group. CONCLUSION Imaging may increase diagnostic confidence but has minimal influence on diagnostic or therapeutic decisions for patients with LBP. The results highlight the need for evidence-based guidelines for imaging in LBP treatment.

[1]  D J Torgerson,et al.  Pragmatic trials: lab meets bedside , 2019, The British journal of dermatology.

[2]  D J Newell,et al.  Intention-to-treat analysis: implications for quantitative and qualitative research. , 1992, International journal of epidemiology.

[3]  A. Szczepura,et al.  Cost effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging in the neurosciences. , 1991, BMJ.

[4]  P. Hecht,et al.  Effect of foot and ankle MR imaging on clinical decision making. , 1996, Radiology.

[5]  L S Freedman,et al.  Evaluating and comparing imaging techniques: a review and classification of study designs. , 1987, The British journal of radiology.

[6]  T. Treasure,et al.  Minimisation: the platinum standard for trials? , 1998, BMJ.

[7]  A. Garratt,et al.  Developing a Valid and Reliable Measure of Health Outcome for Patients With Low Back Pain , 1994, Spine.

[8]  C. Hutchinson,et al.  The therapeutic impact of lumbar spine MRI on patients with low back and leg pain. , 1998, Clinical radiology.

[9]  A. Dixon,et al.  Measuring the effects of imaging: an evaluative framework. , 1995, Clinical radiology.

[10]  K. Berbaum,et al.  Impact of MR imaging on clinical diagnosis and management: a prospective study. , 1986, Radiology.

[11]  A. Dixon Evidence-based diagnostic radiology , 1997, The Lancet.

[12]  L. Hall,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the head and spine: effective for the clinician or the patient? , 1991, BMJ.

[13]  J R Thornbury,et al.  Eugene W. Caldwell Lecture. Clinical efficacy of diagnostic imaging: love it or leave it. , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[14]  B. McClarty,et al.  Influence of magnetic resonance imaging on diagnosis and therapeutic intention. , 1996, Academic radiology.

[15]  M. Abdalla,et al.  The SF36 health survey questionnaire: an outcome measure suitable for routine use within the NHS? , 1993, BMJ.

[16]  G. Guyatt,et al.  The role of before-after studies of therapeutic impact in the evaluation of diagnostic technologies. , 1986, Journal of chronic diseases.

[17]  D L Kent,et al.  Disease, level of impact, and quality of research methods. Three dimensions of clinical efficacy assessment applied to magnetic resonance imaging. , 1992, Investigative radiology.

[18]  D. Lomas,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the shoulder: assessment of effectiveness. , 1997, Clinical radiology.

[19]  Linking health technology assessment to practice , 1999 .

[20]  D. Lomas,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee: assessment of effectiveness. , 1996, Clinical radiology.

[21]  R. Deyo,et al.  Rapid MR imaging versus plain radiography in patients with low back pain: initial results of a randomized study. , 1997, Radiology.

[22]  G. Andersson Epidemiological features of chronic low-back pain , 1999, The Lancet.

[23]  R. Deyo,et al.  Physician variation in diagnostic testing for low back pain. Who you see is what you get. , 1994, Arthritis and rheumatism.