Moderate excitation leads to weakening of perceptual representations.

A fundamental goal of memory research is to specify the conditions that lead to the strengthening and weakening of neural representations. Several computational models of memory formation predict that learning effects should vary as a nonmonotonic function of the amount of excitation received by a neural representation. Specifically, moderate excitation should result in synaptic weakening, while strong excitation should result in synaptic strengthening. In vitro investigations of plasticity in rodents have provided support for this prediction at the level of single synapses. However, it remains unclear whether this principle scales beyond the synapse to cortical representations and manifests changes in behavior. To address this question, we used electroencephalogram pattern classification in human subjects to measure trial-by-trial fluctuations in stimulus processing, and we used a negative priming paradigm to measure learning effects. In keeping with the idea that moderate excitation leads to weakening, moderate levels of stimulus processing were associated with negative priming (slower subsequent responding to the stimulus), but higher and lower levels of stimulus processing were not associated with negative priming. These results suggest that the same principles that account for synaptic weakening in rodents can also account for diminished accessibility of perceptual representations in humans.

[1]  Kenneth A. Norman,et al.  Multivoxel Pattern Analysis Reveals Increased Memory Targeting and Reduced Use of Retrieved Details during Single-Agenda Source Monitoring , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  Ehren L. Newman,et al.  A neural network model of retrieval-induced forgetting. , 2007, Psychological review.

[3]  D. Balota,et al.  Failures to find suppression of episodic memories in the think/no-think paradigm , 2006, Memory & cognition.

[4]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Neural Representation of Task Difficulty and Decision Making during Perceptual Categorization: A Timing Diagram , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  Kenneth A. Norman,et al.  How Inhibitory Oscillations Can Train Neural Networks and Punish Competitors , 2006, Neural Computation.

[6]  G. Rees,et al.  Neuroimaging: Decoding mental states from brain activity in humans , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[7]  Tom Fawcett,et al.  An introduction to ROC analysis , 2006, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[8]  P. Sajda,et al.  Temporal characterization of the neural correlates of perceptual decision making in the human brain. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[9]  Vaidehi S. Natu,et al.  Category-Specific Cortical Activity Precedes Retrieval During Memory Search , 2005, Science.

[10]  Maro G. Machizawa,et al.  Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory , 2005, Nature.

[11]  Walter Senn,et al.  Learning Only When Necessary: Better Memories of Correlated Patterns in Networks with Bounded Synapses , 2005, Neural Computation.

[12]  G. Woodman,et al.  Neural fate of ignored stimuli: dissociable effects of perceptual and working memory load , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[13]  Nathan Intrator,et al.  Theory of Cortical Plasticity: (With Software Package “PLASTICITY”) , 2004 .

[14]  Nathan Intrator,et al.  Theory of Cortical Plasticity , 2004 .

[15]  Brice A. Kuhl,et al.  Neural Systems Underlying the Suppression of Unwanted Memories , 2004, Science.

[16]  Francisco J. Vico,et al.  Stable Neural Attractors Formation: Learning Rules and Network Dynamics , 2003, Neural Processing Letters.

[17]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning , 2003, Technometrics.

[18]  David E. Huber,et al.  Persistence and accommodation in short‐term priming and other perceptual paradigms: temporal segregation through synaptic depression , 2003 .

[19]  David E. Huber,et al.  Persistence and accommodation in short-term priming and other perceptual paradigms: temporal segregation through synaptic depression , 2003, Cogn. Sci..

[20]  Michael C. Anderson,et al.  Suppressing unwanted memories by executive control , 2001, Nature.

[21]  Arthur E. Hoerl,et al.  Ridge Regression: Biased Estimation for Nonorthogonal Problems , 2000, Technometrics.

[22]  E Fox,et al.  Perceptual grouping and visual selective attention , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[23]  A E Seiffert,et al.  Selective attention: a reevaluation of the implications of negative priming. , 1998, Psychological review.

[24]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Object-based perceptual grouping affects negative priming. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  W Singer,et al.  Different threshold levels of postsynaptic [Ca2+]i have to be reached to induce LTP and LTD in neocortical pyramidal cells , 1996, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[26]  A. Treisman,et al.  Visual memory for novel shapes: implicit coding without attention. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[27]  E. Fox Negative priming from ignored distractors in visual selection: A review , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[28]  Bruce Milliken,et al.  Negative priming in a spatial localization task: feature mismatching and distractor inhibition , 1994 .

[29]  S. Connelly,et al.  Aging and the inhibition of spatial location. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  E. Capaldi,et al.  The organization of behavior. , 1992, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[31]  W. Singer,et al.  Different voltage-dependent thresholds for inducing long-term depression and long-term potentiation in slices of rat visual cortex , 1990, Nature.

[32]  S. Tipper,et al.  Selection of moving and static objects for the control of spatially directed action. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[33]  E. Gardner The space of interactions in neural network models , 1988 .

[34]  D. O. Hebb,et al.  The organization of behavior , 1988 .

[35]  Opper,et al.  Learning of correlated patterns in spin-glass networks by local learning rules. , 1987, Physical review letters.

[36]  P. C. Murphy,et al.  Cerebral Cortex , 2017, Cerebral Cortex.

[37]  D. Amit,et al.  Statistical mechanics of neural networks near saturation , 1987 .

[38]  S. Tipper The Negative Priming Effect: Inhibitory Priming by Ignored Objects , 1985, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[39]  Sompolinsky,et al.  Storing infinite numbers of patterns in a spin-glass model of neural networks. , 1985, Physical review letters.

[40]  J J Hopfield,et al.  Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[41]  E. Bienenstock,et al.  Theory for the development of neuron selectivity: orientation specificity and binocular interaction in visual cortex , 1982, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[42]  A. E. Hoerl,et al.  Ridge Regression: Applications to Nonorthogonal Problems , 1970 .