Role of the forkhead transcription family member, FKHR, in thymocyte differentiation

While performing a large‐scale analysis of mRNA transcripts in the murine thymus, our attention was drawn to the forkhead family transcription factor FKHR. Here we demonstrate that FKHR is expressed in thymocytes, most prominently in those that are undergoing positive selection. Interestingly, FKHR transcripts show a highly regionalized pattern of expression, concentrated in the innermost areas of the medulla. We define the FKHR binding site as (G/C)(A/C)N(G/a)T(A/c)AA(T/c) A(T/g)(T/g)(G/c), a sequence found in the regulatory elements of many genes, including certain that encode molecules crucial for thymocyte differentiation. To study the function of FKHR, we engineered mice expressing a dominant‐negative mutant specifically in T cells in a tetracycline‐regulatable fashion. In these animals, T cell differentiation appeared quite normal; however, total thymocyte numbers were decreased, owing to reductions in all four of the CD4/CD8 subsets, and incorporation of the thymidine analogue bromo‐deoxyuridine was increased, again in all four subsets. These data suggest that, in thymocytes, FKHR may be involved in cell survival and/or cycling.

[1]  C Benoist,et al.  Tetracycline-controllable selection of CD4(+) T cells: half-life and survival signals in the absence of major histocompatibility complex class II molecules. , 2000, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[2]  D. Pennington,et al.  Co‐ordination of the expression of the protein tyrosine kinase p56lck with the pre‐T cell receptor during thymocyte development , 2000, European journal of immunology.

[3]  Y. Nishizuka,et al.  Regulation of nuclear translocation of forkhead transcription factor AFX by protein kinase B. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  B. Burgering,et al.  Forkhead transcription factors: new insights into protein kinase B (c-akt) signaling , 1999, Journal of Molecular Medicine.

[5]  P. Cohen,et al.  Phosphorylation of Serine 256 by Protein Kinase B Disrupts Transactivation by FKHR and Mediates Effects of Insulin on Insulin-like Growth Factor-binding Protein-1 Promoter Activity through a Conserved Insulin Response Sequence* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[6]  K. Guan,et al.  Negative Regulation of the Forkhead Transcription Factor FKHR by Akt* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[7]  Geert J. P. L. Kops,et al.  Direct control of the Forkhead transcription factor AFX by protein kinase B , 1999, Nature.

[8]  M. Greenberg,et al.  Akt Promotes Cell Survival by Phosphorylating and Inhibiting a Forkhead Transcription Factor , 1999, Cell.

[9]  R W Wilkinson,et al.  Identification of a developmentally regulated phase of postselection expansion driven by thymic epithelium. , 1998, Journal of immunology.

[10]  W. Cavenee,et al.  Cloning and characterization of three human forkhead genes that comprise an FKHR-like gene subfamily. , 1998, Genomics.

[11]  C. Pénit,et al.  Expansion of mature thymocyte subsets before emigration to the periphery. , 1997, Journal of immunology.

[12]  K. Losos,et al.  An enhancer that directs lineage-specific expression of CD8 in positively selected thymocytes and mature T cells. , 1997, Immunity.

[13]  K. Yao,et al.  Molecular Analysis of a Novel Winged Helix Protein, WIN , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[14]  C. Benoist,et al.  Targeted complementation of MHC class II deficiency by intrathymic delivery of recombinant adenoviruses. , 1997, Immunity.

[15]  W. Knepel,et al.  Glucagon Gene G3 Enhancer: Evidence that Activity Depends on Combination of an Islet-Specific Factor and a Winged Helix Protein , 1997, Biological chemistry.

[16]  A. Elbein,et al.  Synthesis of aryl azide derivatives of UDP-GlcNAc and UDP-GalNAc and their use for the affinity labeling of glycosyltransferases and the UDP-HexNAc pyrophosphorylase. , 1996, Analytical biochemistry.

[17]  W. Knöchel,et al.  Five years on the wings of fork head , 1996, Mechanisms of Development.

[18]  D. Shapiro,et al.  The alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma PAX3/FKHR fusion protein is a transcriptional activator. , 1995, Oncogene.

[19]  F. Barr,et al.  Wild type PAX3 protein and the PAX3-FKHR fusion protein of alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma contain potent, structurally distinct transcriptional activation domains. , 1995, Oncogene.

[20]  P. Carlsson,et al.  Selection of high-affinity binding sites for sequence-specific, DNA binding proteins from random sequence oligonucleotides. , 1995, Analytical biochemistry.

[21]  M. Duvic New member of the winged-helix protein family disrupted in mouse and rat nude mutations , 1995 .

[22]  M. Gossen,et al.  Transcriptional activation by tetracyclines in mammalian cells. , 1995, Science.

[23]  R. Pictet,et al.  Hepatocyte nuclear factor 3 determines the amplitude of the glucocorticoid response of the rat tyrosine aminotransferase gene. , 1995, DNA and cell biology.

[24]  J. Vonesch,et al.  The influence of positive selection on RAG expression in thymocytes , 1995, European journal of immunology.

[25]  R. Dyall,et al.  The majority of postselection CD4+ single-positive thymocytes requires the thymus to produce long-lived, functional T cells , 1995, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[26]  C. Pénit,et al.  Production, selection, and maturation of thymocytes with high surface density of TCR. , 1994, Journal of immunology.

[27]  R. Costa,et al.  The DNA-binding specificity of the hepatocyte nuclear factor 3/forkhead domain is influenced by amino-acid residues adjacent to the recognition helix , 1994, Molecular and cellular biology.

[28]  J. Darnell,et al.  Hepatocyte nuclear factor 3/fork head or "winged helix" proteins: a family of transcription factors of diverse biologic function. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  E. Lai,et al.  Hepatocyte nuclear factor 3 beta contains two transcriptional activation domains, one of which is novel and conserved with the Drosophila fork head protein , 1992, Molecular and cellular biology.

[30]  M. Gossen,et al.  Tight control of gene expression in mammalian cells by tetracycline-responsive promoters. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  D. Littman,et al.  Identification and characterization of a T-cell-specific enhancer adjacent to the murine CD4 gene. , 1991, Molecular and cellular biology.

[32]  F. Ramsdell,et al.  The majority of CD4+8- thymocytes are functionally immature. , 1991, Journal of immunology.

[33]  R. Perlmutter,et al.  Dissection of thymocyte signaling pathways by in vivo expression of pertussis toxin ADP‐ribosyltransferase. , 1990, The EMBO journal.

[34]  M. Egerton,et al.  Kinetics of mature T-cell development in the thymus. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  M. Bevan,et al.  Functional and phenotypic delineation of two subsets of CD4 single positive cells in the thymus. , 1990, International immunology.

[36]  A. Donnenberg,et al.  Qa-2 expression in the adult murine thymus. A unique marker for a mature thymic subset. , 1989, Journal of immunology.

[37]  C. Benoist,et al.  A multiplicity of CCAAT box-binding proteins , 1987, Cell.

[38]  C. Benoist,et al.  Correcting an immune-response deficiency by creating Eα gene transgenic mice , 1985, Nature.

[39]  W. Knöchel,et al.  DNA recognition site analysis of Xenopus winged helix proteins. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.