Lyman's Law is active in loanwords and nonce words: Evidence from naturalness judgment studies

Abstract Lyman's Law is a general phonotactic restriction in Japanese which prohibits two voiced obstruents within the same morpheme. This law manifests itself, for example, in the blockage of Rendaku, a phenomenon which voices the initial consonant of the second member of a compound. Lyman's Law blocks Rendaku when the second member already contains a voiced obstruent. Lyman's Law has been formulated as a general phonotactic restriction against two voiced obstruents ( Ito and Mester, 1986 ), and believed to hold only in native words, not in loanwords, because there are many loanwords that violate this restriction (e.g. [ g aa d o] ‘guard’ and [ b a g u] ‘bug’: Ito and Mester, 2003, 2008 ). Building on Vance (1980) , Tateishi (2003) and Nishimura (2003, 2006) , however, this study shows that Lyman's Law is active even in loanwords, and nonce words more generally. In Experiments I and II, native speakers of Japanese judged Rendaku in nonce words to be less natural when it resulted in a violation of Lyman's Law. In Experiment III, native speakers of Japanese judged devoicing of real loanwords and nonce words to be more natural when devoicing was caused by Lyman's Law. Therefore, the three experiments, as a package, show that Lyman's Law is active both as a blocker and a trigger of phonological alternations. A general implication of this study is that a restriction with many lexical exceptions can still impact native speakers’ treatment of loanwords and nonce words, as predicted by theories that posit that constraints are violable ( Legendre et al., 1990a,b; Prince and Smolensky, 1993/2004 ).

[1]  Mannie Sher,et al.  The Nature of the Work , 1998 .

[2]  J. Pierrehumbert.  Stochastic phonology , 2001 .

[3]  M. Shibatani,et al.  The languages of Japan , 1991 .

[4]  S. Kawahara,et al.  The productivity of a root-initial accenting suffix, [-zu]: judgement studies , 2012 .

[5]  Ashley Farris-Trimble,et al.  Cumulative faithfulness effects in phonology , 2008 .

[6]  Donca Steriade,et al.  The Phonology of Perceptibility Effects: The P-Map and Its Consequences for Constraint Organization , 2008 .

[7]  Armin Mester,et al.  Lexical Classes in Phonology , 2008 .

[8]  Bruce Hayes,et al.  Gradient Well-Formedness in Optimality Theory , 2000 .

[9]  P. Smolensky,et al.  Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar , 2004 .

[10]  T. Vance,et al.  The psychological status of a constraint on Japanese consonant alternation , 1980 .

[11]  B. Hayes,et al.  Stochastic phonological knowledge: the case of Hungarian vowel harmony , 2006, Phonology.

[12]  Junko Ito,et al.  The Phonological Lexicon , 2008 .

[13]  Shigeko Shinohara.  Default Accentuation and Foot Structure in Japanese: Evidence from Japanese Adaptations of French Words , 2000 .

[14]  Shigeto Kawahara,et al.  Phonetic naturalness and unnaturalness in Japanese loanword phonology , 2008 .

[15]  Haruo Kubozono,et al.  Where does loanword prosody come from?: A case study of Japanese loanword accent , 2006 .

[16]  R. Mester,et al.  The Phonology of Voicing in Japanese: Theoretical Consequences for Morphological Accessibility , 2008 .

[17]  Joe Pater,et al.  Weighted Constraints in Generative Linguistics , 2009, Cogn. Sci..

[18]  Christopher Potts,et al.  Harmonic Grammar with linear programming: from linear systems to linguistic typology* , 2010, Phonology.

[19]  柴谷 方良,et al.  The languages of Japan , 2009 .

[20]  The Eurhythmics of Segmental Melody : Some Under lying Parallels between Prominence and , .

[21]  Kie Zuraw,et al.  A model of lexical variation and the grammar with application to Tagalog nasal substitution , 2010 .

[22]  Jon Sprouse.  A validation of Amazon Mechanical Turk for the collection of acceptability judgments in linguistic theory , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[23]  Kie Zuraw,et al.  Patterned exceptions in phonology , 2000 .

[24]  Shigeto Kawahara,et al.  A Faithfulness Ranking Projected from a Perceptibility Scale: The Case of [+ Voice] in Japanese , 2006 .

[25]  Shigeto Kawahara,et al.  Testing Japanese loanword devoicing: Addressing task effects , 2013 .

[26]  S. Kawahara.  Aspects of Japanese loanword devoicing , 2011 .

[27]  Shigeto Kawahara,et al.  Japanese loanword devoicing revisited: a rating study , 2011 .

[28]  Ulf-Dietrich Reips.  Standards for Internet-based experimenting. , 2002 .

[29]  Timothy J. Vance,et al.  An introduction to Japanese phonology , 1987 .

[30]  Haruo Kubozono.  Syllable and Accent in Japanese--Evidence from Loanword Accentuation , 1996 .

[31]  M. Yip.  The obligatory contour principle and phonological rules: a loss of identity , 1988 .

[32]  Keren Rice,et al.  On the patterning of voiced stops in loanwords in Japanese , 2006 .

[33]  R. Baayen,et al.  Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items , 2008 .

[34]  S. Frisch,et al.  The Psychological Reality of OCP-Place in Arabic , 2001 .

[35]  Joe Pater.  Segmental Phonology in Optimality Theory: Austronesian Nasal Substitution Revisited: What's Wrong with *NC (and What's Not) , 2001 .

[36]  Y. Miyata,et al.  Harmonic grammar: A formal multi-level connectionist theory of linguistic well-formedness: Theoretic , 1990 .

[37]  T. Bever,et al.  Sensitivity to Phonological Universals in Children and Adolescents. , 1975 .

[38]  Bruce Hayes,et al.  Explaining sonority projection effects* , 2011, Phonology.

[39]  A. Coetzee.  Grammaticality and Ungrammaticality in Phonology , 2008 .

[40]  Ulf-Dietrich Reips.  Standards for Internet-based experimenting. , 2002, Experimental psychology.

[41]  J. McCarthy.  OCP effects: Gemination and antigemination , 1986 .

[42]  Armin Mester,et al.  Indulgentia Parentum Filiorum Pernicies: Lexical Allomorphy in Latin and Japanese , 2006 .

[43]  Laurence Labrune.  The Phonology of Japanese , 2012 .

[44]  Joe Pater.  The prosody-morphology interface: Austronesian nasal substitution and other NC effects , 1999 .

[45]  B. Hayes,et al.  Rules vs. analogy in English past tenses: a computational/experimental study , 2003, Cognition.

[46]  Ranking paradox in consonant voicing in Japanese , 2002 .

[47]  R. Harald Baayen,et al.  Analyzing linguistic data: a practical introduction to statistics using R, 1st Edition , 2008 .

[48]  Alan Prince,et al.  Prosodic morphology : constraint interaction and satisfaction , 1993 .

[49]  John J. McCarthy,et al.  Doing Optimality Theory , 2008 .

[50]  G. K. Iverson,et al.  The Nonassimilatory Nature of Postnasal Voicing in Japanese , 1998 .

[51]  J. Berko.  The Child's Learning of English Morphology , 1958 .

[52]  Kohei Nishimura,et al.  Lyman's Law in Loanwords , 2006 .

[53]  J. Jenkins,et al.  Studies in the Psychological Correlates of the Sound System of American English , 1964 .

[54]  Jeroen van de Weijer,et al.  Voicing in Japanese , 2005 .

[55]  I. Berent,et al.  The representation of Hebrew words: Evidence from the obligatory contour principle , 1997, Cognition.

[56]  Andries W. Coetzee,et al.  The Place of Variation in Phonological Theory , 2011 .

[57]  C. Crawford,et al.  Adaptation And Transmission In Japanese Loanword Phonology , 2009 .

[58]  Junko Ito.  The phonology of voincing in Japanese , 1986 .

[59]  Haruo Kubozono.  Rendaku: Its domain and linguistic conditions , 2005 .

[60]  P. Smolensky,et al.  Harmonic Grammar -- A Formal Multi-Level Connectionist Theory of Linguistic Well-Formedness: An Application ; CU-CS-464-90 , 1990 .

[61]  J. McCawley.  The phonological component of a grammar of Japanese , 1968 .

[62]  B. Lyman,et al.  The change from surd to sonant in Japanese compounds , 1894 .

[63]  Bruce Tesar,et al.  A Comparison of Lexicographic and Linear Numeric Optimization Using Violation Difference Ratios * , 2007 .

[64]  Juliette Blevins,et al.  Typological implications of Kalam predictable vowels* , 2010, Phonology.

[65]  T. Vance,et al.  Some Aspects of Rendaku in Japanese and Related Problems in Theoretical Issues in Japanese Linguistics. , 1980 .

[66]  H. J. Bennis.  Besprekingsartikel van R.S. Kirsner The problem of presentative sentences in Modern Dutch , 1982 .

[67]  柴谷 方良,et al.  Current issues in the history and structure of Japanese , 2007 .

[68]  Shigeru Miyagawa,et al.  The Oxford handbook of Japanese linguistics , 2008 .

[69]  K. Tamaoka,et al.  Effects of first-element phonological-length and etymological-type features on sequential voicing (rendaku) of second elements , 2009 .