Nonlinear power system model reduction based on empirical Gramians

Abstract An effective nonlinear model reduction approach, empirical Gramians balanced reduction approach, is studied, to reduce the computation complexity in nonlinear power system model application. The realization procedure is: firstly, computing the empirical controllable and observable Gramians matrices of nonlinear power system model, secondly, by these two matrices, computing the balance transformation matrix to obtain the balanced system model of the original model, then, computing the controllable and observable matrices of the balanced system to obtain the diagonal Hankel singular matrix. Finally, deciding the lower-order subspace to obtain the reduced power system model. A 15-machine power system model is taken as an example to perform the reduction simulation analysis.

[1]  Juergen Hahn,et al.  Model reduction in the presence of uncertainty in model parameters , 2006 .

[2]  Juergen Hahn,et al.  Reduction of stable differential–algebraic equation systems via projections and system identification , 2005 .

[3]  D. Sorensen,et al.  Approximation of large-scale dynamical systems: an overview , 2004 .

[4]  N. Martins,et al.  Computing Dominant Poles of Power System Multivariable Transfer Functions , 2002, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[5]  J. Marsden,et al.  A subspace approach to balanced truncation for model reduction of nonlinear control systems , 2002 .

[6]  L. Sirovich.  TURBULENCE AND THE DYNAMICS OF COHERENT STRUCTURES PART , 2016 .

[7]  Nina F. Thornhill,et al.  Comparative review of methods for stability monitoring in electrical power systems and vibrating structures , 2010 .

[8]  Thomas J. Overbye,et al.  Mixed power flow analysis using AC and DC models , 2012 .

[9]  Thomas F. Edgar,et al.  Balancing Approach to Minimal Realization and Model Reduction of Stable Nonlinear Systems , 2002 .

[10]  M.A. Pai,et al.  Model reduction in power systems using Krylov subspace methods , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[11]  David J. Hill,et al.  Power system voltage small-disturbance stability studies based on the power flow equation , 2010 .

[12]  H. H. Happ,et al.  Power System Control and Stability , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[13]  M. S. Sachdev,et al.  Identification of generator loss-of-excitation from power-swing conditions using a fast pattern classification method , 2013 .

[14]  Arindam Ghosh,et al.  Generator coherency and area detection in large power systems , 2012 .

[15]  Zhao Yang Dong,et al.  Induction motor load impact on power system eigenvalue sensitivity analysis , 2009 .

[16]  J. Myrzik,et al.  Dynamic equivalencing of distribution networks with dispersed generation , 2006 .

[17]  Joe H. Chow,et al.  Power system reduction to simplify the design of damping controllers for interarea oscillations , 1996 .

[18]  Dhadbanjan Thukaram,et al.  Support vector clustering-based direct coherency identification of generators in a multi-machine power system , 2013 .

[19]  Athanasios C. Antoulas,et al.  A new result on passivity preserving model reduction , 2005, Syst. Control. Lett..

[20]  Roy Billinton,et al.  Adequacy equivalent development of composite generation and transmission systems using network screening , 2011 .

[21]  A. M. Miah.  Study of a coherency-based simple dynamic equivalent for transient stability assessment , 2011 .