Does firm performance reveal its own causes? the role of Bayesian inference

A central problem in strategic management is how the inference ‘sustainable competitive advantage generates sustainable superior performance’ can be put into practice. In this article we develop a theoretical framework to understand the causal relationships among (1) sustainable competitive advantage, (2) configuration, (3) dynamic capability, and (4) sustainable superior performance. We propose that a firm's competitive advantage, resource bundle configuration, and dynamic learning capability cannot be comprehended by outsiders. Its operational performance, however, can be captured by financial indicators. We promote an inductive Bayesian interpretation of the sustainable competitive advantage proposition. From this viewpoint, the presence or absence of competitive advantage may be reflected in the causal relationship between resource configuration, dynamic capability, and observable financial performance. We apply this theoretical framework to an example drawn from the global semiconductor industry, an area in which resource configuration and dynamic capability are essential to performance. The paper concludes with a summary of the proposed model and suggestions for future theoretical development of strategic management. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  David Besanko,et al.  Economics of Strategy , 1995 .

[2]  Colin Howson,et al.  Bayesian reasoning in science , 1991, Nature.

[3]  J. Liebeskind,et al.  Knowledge, Strategy, and the Theory of the Firm , 1996 .

[4]  S. Spear Learning to lead at Toyota. , 2004, Harvard business review.

[5]  P. Ghemawat,et al.  ZARA : fast fashion , 2006 .

[6]  J. Tirole The Theory of Industrial Organization , 1988 .

[7]  Richard J. Arend Revisiting the logical and research considerations of competitive advantage , 2003 .

[8]  Araújo,et al.  An Evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[9]  J. Ivery,et al.  Organizational Ecology , 2007 .

[10]  John Roberts,et al.  Uncertain Imitability : An Analysis of Interfirm Differences in Efficiency under Competition , 2007 .

[11]  E. L. Cox,et al.  Guest editors\' introduction to the special issue: why is there a resource-based view? Toward a theory of competitive heterogeneity , 2003 .

[12]  J. Barney,et al.  Organizational Culture: Can It Be a Source of Sustained Competitive Advantage? , 1986 .

[13]  S. Spear,et al.  Decoding the DNA of the Toyota Production System , 1999 .

[14]  Henry Mintzberg Musings on management. Ten ideas designed to rile everyone who cares about management. , 1996, Harvard business review.

[15]  Margaret A. Peteraf The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource‐based view , 1993 .

[16]  K. Boal,et al.  Strategic resources: Traits, configurations and paths to sustainable competitive advantage , 2007 .

[17]  J. Mackie,et al.  I . CAUSES AND CONDITIONS , 2008 .

[18]  Casey Ichniowski,et al.  The Effects of Human Resource Management Practices on Productivity , 1995 .

[19]  Jan W. Rivkin Imitation of Complex Strategies , 2000 .

[20]  R. Grant The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation , 1991 .

[21]  J. Barney,et al.  IS THE RESOURCE-BASED " VIEW " A USEFUL PERSPECTIVE FOR STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT RESEARCH ? , 2001 .

[22]  Daniel A. Levinthal Adaptation on rugged landscapes , 1997 .

[23]  Jeffrey K. Liker,et al.  The Toyota way : 14 management principles from the world's greatest manufacturer , 2004 .

[24]  S. Lippman,et al.  A BARGAINING PERSPECTIVE ON RESOURCE ADVANTAGE , 2003 .

[25]  P. Schoemaker,et al.  Strategic assets and organizational rent , 1993 .

[26]  W. G. Astley,et al.  Administrative Science as Socially Constructed Truth. , 1985 .

[27]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[28]  R. Rumelt Towards a Strategic Theory of the Firm , 1984 .

[29]  Shelby D. Hunt,et al.  Foundations of Marketing Theory: Toward a General Theory of Marketing , 2002 .

[30]  Michael E. Raynor,et al.  The Innovator's Solution: Creating and Sustaining Successful Growth , 2003 .

[31]  Nicolaj Siggelkow Change in the Presence of Fit: the Rise, the Fall, and the Renaissance of Liz Claiborne , 2001 .

[32]  J. Barney Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[33]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[34]  Stuart C. Gilson,et al.  Scott Paper Company , 1998 .

[35]  Margaret A. Peteraf,et al.  Managerial discretion and internal alignment under regulatory constraints and change , 2007 .

[36]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  The Economics of Modern Manufacturing: Technology, Strategy, and Organization , 1990 .

[37]  Margaret A. Peteraf,et al.  Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI: 10.1002/mde.1126 Unraveling The Resource-Based Tangle , 2022 .

[38]  Donald C. Hambrick,et al.  Taxonomic Approaches to Studying Strategy: Some Conceptual and Methodological Issues , 1984 .

[39]  Jie W Weiss,et al.  Bayesian Statistical Inference for Psychological Research , 2008 .

[40]  Stuart A. Kauffman,et al.  ORIGINS OF ORDER , 2019, Origins of Order.

[41]  Thomas C. Powell,et al.  The Philosophy of Strategy , 2002 .

[42]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[43]  Yiannis E. Spanos,et al.  An examination into the causal logic of rent generation: contrasting Porter's competitive strategy framework and the resource-based perspective , 2001 .

[44]  J. Barney,et al.  Organizational Economics: Understanding the Relationship between Organizations and Economic Analysis , 1999 .

[45]  C. Reese,et al.  A Bayesian operationalization of the resource‐based view , 2004 .

[46]  T. C. Powell,et al.  Strategy without ontology , 2003 .

[47]  Carl G. Hempel,et al.  I.—STUDIES IN THE LOGIC OF CONFIRMATION (II.) , 1945 .

[48]  Adam Brandenburger,et al.  Value-based Business Strategy , 2005 .

[49]  T. Troward Causes and conditions. , 1919 .

[50]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[51]  Rodolphe Durand Competitive advantages exist: A critique of Powell , 2002 .

[52]  D. Schendel,et al.  Introduction to ‘Competitive Organizational Behavior: Toward an Organizationally-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage’ , 1994 .

[53]  Imre Lakatos,et al.  Mathematics, science and epistemology: Indexes , 1978 .

[54]  Nicolaj Siggelkow Evolution toward Fit , 2002 .

[55]  T. C. Powell Competitive advantage: logical and philosophical considerations , 2001 .

[56]  Cynthia A. Montgomery,et al.  Strategy Content and the Research Process: A Critique and Commentary , 1989 .

[57]  J. R. Moore,et al.  The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[58]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge and the Speed of the Transfer and Imitation of Organizational Capabilities: An Empirical Test , 1995 .

[59]  G. Tyge Payne Examining Configurations and Firm Performance in a Suboptimal Equifinality Context , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[60]  Robert E. Hoskisson,et al.  BOARD OF DIRECTOR INVOLVEMENT IN RESTRUCTURING: THE EFFECTS OF BOARD VERSUS MANAGERIAL CONTROLS , 1993 .

[61]  C. Hempel Philosophy of Natural Science , 1966 .

[62]  R. E. Miles,et al.  Fit, Failure and the Hall of Fame , 1984 .

[63]  P. H. Friesen,et al.  Archetypes of Strategy Formulation , 1978 .

[64]  M. Porter Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance , 1985 .

[65]  M. Porter What is strategy , 2000 .

[66]  John Skilling,et al.  Data analysis : a Bayesian tutorial , 1996 .

[67]  Robert Drazin,et al.  Equifinality: Functional Equivalence in Organization Design , 1997 .

[68]  J. E. Butler,et al.  Tautology in the resource-based view and the implications of externally determined resource value: f , 2001 .

[69]  David J. Miller,et al.  Configurations of strategy and structure: Towards a synthesis , 1986 .

[70]  M. Porter Towards a dynamic theory of strategy , 1991 .

[71]  Larry Laudan,et al.  Science and Values: The Aims of Science and Their Role in Scientific Debate , 1984 .

[72]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The Core Competence of the Corporation , 1990 .

[73]  William H. Glick,et al.  Fit, Equifinality, and Organizational Effectiveness: A Test of Two Configurational Theories , 1993 .

[74]  Maurizio Zollo,et al.  Deliberate Learning and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities , 2002 .

[75]  James Waldroop,et al.  Understanding "people" people. , 2004, Harvard business review.

[76]  J. Barney Is the Resource-Based “View” a Useful Perspective for Strategic Management Research? Yes , 2001 .

[77]  Robert J. Litschert,et al.  Environment-strategy relationship and its performance implications: An empirical study of the , 1994 .

[78]  R. Reed,et al.  Causal Ambiguity, Barriers to Imitation, and Sustainable Competitive Advantage , 1990 .

[79]  Paul Milgrom,et al.  Complementarities and fit strategy, structure, and organizational change in manufacturing , 1995 .

[80]  Thomas C. Powell,et al.  Fallibilism and Organizational Research: The Third Epistemology , 2001 .

[81]  George M. Zinkhan,et al.  Strategy and the research process: A comment , 1991 .

[82]  Robert M. Grant Cases to Accompany Contemporary Strategy Analysis , 1996 .

[83]  Michael E. Porter,et al.  Matching Dell (A) , 1999 .

[84]  R. Mir,et al.  Strategic management and the philosophy of science: the case for a constructivist methodology , 2000 .

[85]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[86]  S. Winter,et al.  Replication as Strategy , 2001 .

[87]  R E Miles,et al.  Organizational strategy, structure, and process. , 1978, Academy of management review. Academy of Management.

[88]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  The dynamic resource-based view: capability lifecycles , 2003 .

[89]  R. Coff When Competitive Advantage Doesn't Lead to Performance: The Resource-Based View and Stakeholder Bargaining Power , 1999 .

[90]  Jan W. Rivkin Reproducing Knowledge: Replication Without Imitation at Moderate Complexity , 2001 .

[91]  J. Barney,et al.  CAPABILITIES, BUSINESS PROCESSES, AND COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: CHOOSING THE DEPENDENT VARIABLE IN EMPIRICAL TESTS OF THE RESOURCE-BASED VIEW , 2004 .