Processes, barriers, and outcomes described by ergonomics consultants in preventing work-related musculoskeletal disorders.

Despite the importance of reducing work-related musculoskeletal disorders, there appears to have been little evaluation of routine ergonomics consultancy interventions aimed at reducing risks leading to these conditions. In many instances, the effectiveness of advice depends on organisations accepting and implementing measures recommended, involving changes of both individual and collective behaviour. Behaviour change theory, developed elsewhere, suggests that if change is to take place, recipients need to hold positive attitudes and beliefs relating to the desirable behaviour. To investigate the extent to which this is accommodated by current ergonomics consultancy practices, 14 ergonomics consultants were interviewed to explore the consultancy process from which recommendations are developed, exploring the factors that are assessed by consultants, perceived barriers to promoting change, and the extent to which evaluation of outcomes takes place. Consultants' recommendations generally focused on physical aspects of the work environment and did not take explicit account of employees' knowledge or attitudes. Little evaluation of outcomes was conducted by the consultants interviewed. Implications of these findings for improving the efficacy of interventions to reduce work-related musculoskeletal disorders within organisations are discussed.

[1]  L McAtamney,et al.  RULA: a survey method for the investigation of work-related upper limb disorders. , 1993, Applied ergonomics.

[2]  E. Volinn Do workplace interventions prevent low-back disorders? If so, why?: a methodologic commentary. , 1999, Ergonomics.

[3]  Seymour Wh Fitting the service to the plant. , 1947 .

[4]  A. Griffiths Organizational interventions: facing the limits of the natural science paradigm. , 1999, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[5]  J. Prochaska,et al.  Transtheoretical therapy: Toward a more integrative model of change. , 1982 .

[6]  Peter L Block,et al.  Flawless Consulting: A Guide to Getting Your Expertise Used , 1987 .

[7]  Henrich R. Greve,et al.  Organizational Learning from Performance Feedback: A Behavioral Perspective on Innovation and Change , 2003 .

[8]  Ben-Tzion Karsh,et al.  The efficacy of workplace ergonomic interventions to control musculoskeletal disorders: A critical analysis of the peer-reviewed literature , 2001 .

[9]  Snook Sh,et al.  Approaches to the control of back pain in industry: job design, job placement and education/training. , 1988 .

[10]  S Hignett,et al.  Rapid entire body assessment (REBA). , 2000, Applied ergonomics.

[11]  E. N. Corlett,et al.  Evaluation of Human Work , 2005 .

[12]  R. Haslam Targeting ergonomics interventions--learning from health promotion. , 2002, Applied ergonomics.

[13]  Natasa Rupcic,et al.  The fifth discipline-the art and practice of the learning organisation , 2002 .

[14]  C. Kleinke,et al.  Two Models for Conceptualizing the Attitude-Behavior Relationship , 1984 .

[15]  I. Dey Qualitative Data Analysis: A User Friendly Guide for Social Scientists , 1993 .

[16]  J R Wilson,et al.  Fundamentals of ergonomics in theory and practice. , 2000, Applied ergonomics.

[17]  Robert E. Thomas,et al.  Intervention effectiveness research , 2003 .

[18]  R. Chesson,et al.  Health care management: models for evidence-based practice. , 2001, Journal of management in medicine.

[19]  P. Senge The fifth discipline : the art and practice of the learning organization/ Peter M. Senge , 1991 .