Keys to Detecting Writing Flexibility Over Time: Entropy and Natural Language Processing

Writing researchers have suggested that students who are perceived as strong writers (i.e., those who generate texts that are rated as high quality) demonstrate flexibility in their writing style. While anecdotally this has been a commonly held belief among researchers, scientists, and educators, there is little empirical research to support this claim. This study further investigates this hypothesis by examining how students vary in their use of two linguistic features (i.e., narrativity and cohesion) across 16 prompt-based essays. Forty-five high school students wrote 16 essays across 8 sessions within an Automated Writing Evaluation (AWE) system. Natural language processing (NLP) techniques and Entropy analyses were used to calculate how rigid or flexible students were in their use of narrative and cohesive linguistic features over time and how this trait related to individual differences in literacy abilities (i.e., vocabulary knowledge and comprehension ability), prior world knowledge, and essay quality. For instance, through the unique combination of NLP and Entropy, we found that patterns of narrative flexibility (or rigidity) was significantly and reliably related to students’ prior reading comprehension ability after 2 sessions (4 essays).   Conversely, students’ flexible (or rigid) use of cohesive features was reliably related to their prior reading comprehension ability after 5 sessions (10 essays). These exploratory methodologies are important for researchers and educators, as they indicate that writing flexibility is indeed a trait of strong writers and can be detected rather quickly using the combination of textual features and dynamic analyses.

[1]  E. R. Grossman Entropy and choice time: The effect of frequency unbalance on choice-response , 1953 .

[2]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Component processes in text comprehension and some of their interactions , 1985 .

[3]  D. McNamara,et al.  Cohesion, coherence, and expert evaluations of writing proficiency , 2010 .

[4]  Melissa E. DeRosier,et al.  Zoo U: A Stealth Approach to Social Skills Assessment in Schools , 2012, Adv. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[5]  Laura K. Allen,et al.  L2 writing practice: Game enjoyment as a key to engagement , 2014 .

[6]  Ryan Shaun Joazeiro de Baker,et al.  Developing a generalizable detector of when students game the system , 2008, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[7]  H. Swanson,et al.  Individual differences in children's working memory and writing skill. , 1996, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[8]  Danielle S. McNamara,et al.  What Is Successful Writing? An Investigation Into the Multiple Ways Writers Can Write Successful Essays , 2014 .

[9]  Danielle S. McNamara,et al.  Educational Game Enjoyment, Perceptions, and Features in an Intelligent Writing Tutor , 2013, FLAIRS.

[10]  Yoon Jeon Kim,et al.  Formative and Stealth Assessment , 2014 .

[11]  Erica L. Snow,et al.  The narrative waltz: The role of flexibility in writing proficiency , 2016 .

[12]  Danielle S. McNamara,et al.  Emergent behaviors in computer-based learning environments: Computational signals of catching up , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[13]  Philip M. McCarthy,et al.  Linguistic Features of Writing Quality , 2010 .

[14]  J. W. Gikandi,et al.  Online formative assessment in higher education: A review of the literature , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[15]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Computational Analyses of Multilevel Discourse Comprehension , 2011, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[16]  E. B. Page Project Essay Grade: PEG. , 2003 .

[17]  Danielle S McNamara,et al.  Natural language processing in an intelligent writing strategy tutoring system , 2012, Behavior Research Methods.

[18]  Danielle S. McNamara,et al.  Text Coherence and Judgments of Essay Quality: Models of Quality and Coherence , 2011, CogSci.

[19]  水本 豪,et al.  Individual differences in children's working memory capacity and their sentence comprehension : The case of relative clause and cleft sentences , 2010 .

[20]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Coh-Metrix: An automated tool for theoretical and applied natural language processing , 2011 .

[21]  Danielle S. McNamara,et al.  Measuring deep, reflective comprehension and learning strategies: challenges and successes , 2011 .

[22]  Danielle S. McNamara,et al.  Predicting Human Scores of Essay Quality Using Computational Indices of Linguistic and Textual Features , 2011, AIED.

[23]  Danielle S. McNamara,et al.  Quantifying Text Difficulty with Automated Indices of Cohesion and Semantics , 2007 .

[24]  S. Graham,et al.  The Role of Self-Regulation and Transcription Skills in Writing and Writing Development , 2000 .

[25]  Mark Warschauer,et al.  Automated writing evaluation: defining the classroom research agenda , 2006 .

[26]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Coh-Metrix: Analysis of text on cohesion and language , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[27]  R. T. Kellogg,et al.  Training writing skills: A cognitive developmental perspective , 2008 .

[28]  Rod D. Roscoe,et al.  Writing pal: Feasibility of an intelligent writing strategy tutor in the high school classroom , 2013 .

[29]  Brent A. Olde,et al.  How does the mind construct and represent stories , 2002 .

[30]  V. Shute SteAlth ASSeSSment in computer-BASed GAmeS to Support leArninG , 2011 .

[31]  Danielle S. McNamara,et al.  Self-Explanation Reading Training: Effects for Low-Knowledge Readers , 2004 .

[32]  P. Patterson,et al.  The impact of communication effectiveness and service quality on relationship commitment in consumer, professional services , 1999 .

[33]  P. Black,et al.  Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards through Classroom Assessment , 2010 .

[34]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Automated Evaluation of Text and Discourse with Coh-Metrix: Introduction , 2014 .

[35]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Coh-Metrix , 2011 .

[36]  Claude E. Shannon,et al.  Prediction and Entropy of Printed English , 1951 .

[37]  Michael Halliday,et al.  Cohesion in English , 1976 .

[38]  Danielle S. McNamara,et al.  The Long and Winding Road: Investigating the Differential Writing Patterns of High and Low Skilled Writers , 2014, EDM.

[39]  Richard J. Gerrig,et al.  Experiencing Narrative Worlds: On the Psychological Activities of Reading , 1993 .

[40]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Are Good Texts Always Better? Interactions of Text Coherence, Background Knowledge, and Levels of Understanding in Learning From Text , 1996 .

[41]  Danielle S. McNamara,et al.  The epistemic stance between the author and reader: A driving force in the cohesion of text and writing , 2013 .

[42]  D. McCutchen Knowledge, Processing, and Working Memory: Implications for a Theory of Writing , 2000 .

[43]  Douglas Biber,et al.  Variation across speech and writing: Methodology , 1988 .

[44]  R. Hertwig,et al.  Size, entropy, and density : What is the difference that makes the difference between small and large real-world assortments? , 2009 .

[45]  Danielle S. McNamara,et al.  Predicting Second Language Writing Proficiency: The Roles of Cohesion and Linguistic Sophistication , 2012 .

[46]  Jill Burstein,et al.  AUTOMATED ESSAY SCORING WITH E‐RATER® V.2.0 , 2004 .

[47]  Lawrence M. Rudner,et al.  An Evaluation of IntelliMetric™ Essay Scoring System , 2006 .

[48]  Laura K. Allen,et al.  A Hierarchical Classification Approach to Automated Essay Scoring. , 2015 .

[49]  Danielle S. McNamara,et al.  Students' Walk through Tutoring: Using a Random Walk Analysis to Profile Students , 2013, EDM.

[50]  L. Gregg,et al.  Identifying the Organization of Writing Processes , 2016 .

[51]  付伶俐 打磨Using Language,倡导新理念 , 2014 .

[52]  Laura K. Allen,et al.  Does agency matter?: Exploring the impact of controlled behaviors within a game-based environment , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[53]  Steve Graham,et al.  Writing Next: Effective Strategies to Improve Writing of Adolescents in Middle and High Schools. A Report to Carnegie Corporation of New York. , 2007 .

[54]  L. Faigley,et al.  Coherence, Cohesion, and Writing Quality , 1981, College Composition & Communication.

[55]  Erica L. Snow,et al.  You've got style: detecting writing flexibility across time , 2015, LAK.

[56]  Mark Warschauer,et al.  Utility in a Fallible Tool: A Multi-Site Case Study of Automated Writing Evaluation. , 2010 .

[57]  Danielle S. McNamara,et al.  Developing Pedagogically-Guided Threshold Algorithms for Intelligent Automated Essay Feedback , 2012, FLAIRS Conference.

[58]  Thomas Newkirk How We Really Comprehend Nonfiction. , 2012 .

[59]  Hayes identifying the organization of wi iiing processes , 1980 .