Probabilistic Registration of 3-D Medical Images

Registration between 3-D images of human anatomies enables cross-subject diagnosis. However, innate differences in the appearance and location of anatomical structures between individuals make accurate registration difficult. We characterize such anatomical variations to achieve accurate registration. We represent anatomical variations in the form of statistical models, and embed these statistics into a 3-D digital brain atlas which we use as a reference. These models are built by registering a training set of brain MRI volumes with the atlas. This associates each voxel in the atlas with multi-dimensional distributions of variations in intensity and geometry of the training set. We evaluate statistical properties of these distributions to build a statistical atlas. When we register the statistical atlas with a particular subject, the embedded statistics function as prior knowledge to guide the deformation process. This allows the deformation to tolerate variations between individuals while retaining discrimination between different structures. This method gives an overall voxel mis-classification rate of 2.9% on 40 test cases; this is a 34% error reduction over the performance of our previous algorithm without using anatomical knowledge. Besides achieving accurate registration, statistical models of anatomical variations also enable quantitative study of anatomical differences between populations.

[1]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  Warping of a computerized 3-D atlas to match brain image volumes for quantitative neuroanatomical and functional analysis , 1991, Medical Imaging.

[2]  Michael I. Miller,et al.  On The Geometry and Shape of Brain Sub-Manifolds , 1997, Int. J. Pattern Recognit. Artif. Intell..

[3]  J. Gee,et al.  An Empirical Model of Brain Shape , 1998 .

[4]  W. Eric L. Grimson,et al.  Enhanced Spatial Priors for Segmentation of Magnetic Resonance Imagery , 1998, MICCAI.

[5]  U. Grenander,et al.  Statistical methods in computational anatomy , 1997, Statistical methods in medical research.

[6]  Sartaj Sahni,et al.  An efficient motion estimator with application to medical image registration , 1998, Medical Image Anal..

[7]  Takeo Kanade,et al.  Anomaly detection through registration , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (Cat. No.98CB36231).

[8]  Takeo Kanade,et al.  Anomaly detection through registration , 1999, Pattern Recognit..

[9]  Jean-Philippe Thirion,et al.  Fast Non-Rigid Matching of 3D Medical Images , 1995 .

[10]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Characterization of Neuropathological Shape Deformations , 1998, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[11]  E ChristensenGary,et al.  Individualizing Neuroanatomical Atlases Using a Massively Parallel Computer , 1996 .

[12]  Guido Gerig,et al.  Segmentation of 2-D and 3-D objects from MRI volume data using constrained elastic deformations of flexible Fourier contour and surface models , 1996, Medical Image Anal..

[13]  Lawrence H. Staib,et al.  Elastic Model Based Non-rigid Registration Incorporation Statistical Shape Information , 1998, MICCAI.

[14]  A. Toga,et al.  High-Resolution Random Mesh Algorithms for Creating a Probabilistic 3D Surface Atlas of the Human Brain , 1996, NeuroImage.

[15]  Michael I. Miller,et al.  Individualizing Neuroanatomic Atlases Using a Massively Parallel Computer , 1996, Computer.

[16]  Ruzena Bajcsy,et al.  Multiresolution elastic matching , 1989, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[17]  A. Pentland,et al.  Characterization of Neuropathological Shape , 1998 .

[18]  Jean Meunier,et al.  Automatic Computation of Average Brain Models , 1998, MICCAI.

[19]  Fred L. Bookstein,et al.  Landmark methods for forms without landmarks: morphometrics of group differences in outline shape , 1997, Medical Image Anal..