Technology affordances: the 'real story' in research with K-12 and undergraduate learners

Computer technologies for learning environments have been introduced with great expectations for improved learning outcomes. However, the great improvements have not materialised; some of these extant studies are examined. Of all the explanations for these disappointing results, the least examined are the affordances of the computer tools. This paper provides a rationale for studying affordances and presents two studies in K-12 and undergraduate settings showing how powerful affordances are in affecting outcomes. Finally, the paper presents guidelines on how to gradually move students from a game affordance of a computer to a learning mode.

[1]  Michael R. Abraham,et al.  The effects of computer animation on the particulate mental models of college chemistry students , 1995 .

[2]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  The invisible computer , 1998 .

[3]  Ronald M. Baecker,et al.  Readings in human-computer interaction : toward the year 2000 , 1995 .

[4]  Diana Laurillard,et al.  Computer simulation as a tool for developing intuitive and conceptual understanding in mechanics , 1993 .

[5]  G. Salomon,et al.  Educational Psychology and Technology: A Matter of Reciprocal Relations , 1998, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[6]  Evan Golub,et al.  On audience activities during presentations , 2005 .

[7]  R. Coppola,et al.  Physiological characteristics of capacity constraints in working memory as revealed by functional MRI. , 1999, Cerebral cortex.

[8]  R. Pea.  Beyond Amplification : Using the Computer to Reorganize Mental Functioning , 1985 .

[9]  Gavriel Salomon,et al.  Predispositions about Learning from Print and Television. , 1984 .

[10]  Z. Berge,et al.  Effects of group size, gender, and ability grouping on learning science process skills using microcomputers , 1990 .

[11]  Gavriel Salomon,et al.  Cognitive Effects With and Of Computer Technology , 1990 .

[12]  Joseph S. Valacich,et al.  The Influence of Task Interruption on Individual Decision Making: An Information Overload Perspective , 1999 .

[13]  A Baddeley,et al.  The fractionation of working memory. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  Roger Azevedo,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Feedback in Computer-Based Instruction , 1995 .

[15]  John W. Shrum,et al.  The effects of microcomputer‐based laboratory exercises on the acquisition of line graph construction and interpretation skills by high school biology students , 1990 .

[16]  Robert L. Mayes,et al.  The Application of a Computer Algebra System as a Tool in College Algebra. , 1995 .

[17]  Gillian Smith,et al.  Affordances and Constraints of Computers in Science Education , 1996 .

[18]  Y. Lou,et al.  Small Group and Individual Learning with Technology: A Meta-Analysis , 2001 .

[19]  Albert Koelmans,et al.  Effectiveness of computer-aided learning as a direct replacement for lecturing in degree-level electronics , 1998 .

[20]  June Lee,et al.  Effectiveness of Computer-Based Instructional Simulation: A Meta Analysis. , 1999 .

[21]  Jiajie Zhang,et al.  The Nature of External Representations in Problem Solving , 1997, Cogn. Sci..

[22]  Ton de Jong,et al.  The Integration of Computer Simulation and Learning Support: An Example from the Physics Domain of Collisions , 1999 .

[23]  K. Scherer,et al.  How Seductive Details Do Their Damage : A Theory of Cognitive Interest in Science Learning , 2004 .

[24]  B. Meyer,et al.  Effects of structure strategy instruction delivered to fifth-grade children using the Internet with and without the aid of older adult tutors. , 2002 .

[25]  G. J. Kelly,et al.  Student's interaction with computer representations: Analysis of discourse in laboratory groups , 1996 .

[26]  R. Kozma,et al.  Multimedia and understanding: Expert and novice responses to different representations of chemical phenomena , 1997 .

[27]  Bonnie J. F. Meyer,et al.  Design and Pilot of a Web-Based Intelligent Tutoring System to Improve Reading Comprehension in Middle School Students , 2006 .

[28]  Leysia Palen,et al.  Instant messaging in teen life , 2002, CSCW '02.

[29]  Claudio A. Canizares,et al.  Advantages and disadvantages of using various computer tools in electrical engineering courses , 1997 .

[30]  Claire M. Fletcher-Flinn,et al.  The Efficacy of Computer Assisted Instruction (CAI): A Meta-Analysis , 1995 .

[31]  Barbara Lockee,et al.  No comparison: Distance education finds a new use for ‘No significant difference’ , 1999 .

[32]  Joseph S. Valacich,et al.  AIS Electronic , 2022 .

[33]  Juli K. Dixon.  Computer Use and Visualization in Students' Construction of Reflection and Rotation Concepts , 1997 .

[34]  G. Salomon,et al.  The computer as a zone of proximal development: Internalizing reading-related metacognitions from a Reading Partner. , 1989 .

[35]  Curtis J. Bonk,et al.  Early Adolescent Composing within a Generative-Evaluative Computerized Prompting Framework , 1992 .

[36]  Wolff-Michael Roth,et al.  Affordances of computers in teacher‐student interactions: The case of interactive physics™ , 1995 .

[37]  Glenda Carter,et al.  Examining science tools as mediators of students' learning about circuits , 1999 .