Clinical outcomes for primary molars treated by different types of pulpotomy: A retrospective cohort study.

[1]  N. Farsi,et al.  Sodium Hypochlorite Versus Formocresol and Ferric Sulfate Pulpotomies in Primary Molars: 18-month Follow-up. , 2015, Pediatric dentistry.

[2]  Samah Omar.  MTA, Formocresol, and Ferric Sulfate Have Significantly Better Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes Than Calcium Hydroxide and Laser Therapies in Primary Molar Pulpotomies After 18-24 Months. , 2015, The journal of evidence-based dental practice.

[3]  Y. Al-Dlaigan.  Pulpotomy Medicaments used in Deciduous Dentition: An Update. , 2015, The journal of contemporary dental practice.

[4]  N. Srivastava,et al.  Laser Pulpotomy–An Effective Alternative to Conventional Techniques: A 12 Months Clinicoradiographic Study , 2015, International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry.

[5]  K. Saujanya,et al.  Clinical Evaluation of Success of Primary Teeth Pulpotomy Using Mineral Trioxide Aggregate(®), Laser and Biodentine(TM)- an In Vivo Study. , 2015, Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR.

[6]  N. Lourenço Neto,et al.  Clinical and radiographic outcomes of the use of Low-Level Laser Therapy in vital pulp of primary teeth. , 2015, International journal of paediatric dentistry.

[7]  I. Parisay,et al.  A Review on Vital Pulp Therapy in Primary Teeth , 2014, Iranian endodontic journal.

[8]  T. Oliveira,et al.  Low-level laser therapy as an alternative for pulpotomy in human primary teeth , 2015, Lasers in Medical Science.

[9]  Y. Tu,et al.  Primary molar pulpotomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. , 2014, Journal of dentistry.

[10]  M. Akcay,et al.  Effects of sodium hypoclorite as disinfectant material previous to pulpotomies in primary teeth , 2014, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[11]  B. Durmuş,et al.  In vivo evaluation of the treatment outcome of pulpotomy in primary molars using diode laser, formocresol, and ferric sulphate. , 2014, Photomedicine and laser surgery.

[12]  P. Yadav,et al.  Comparative evaluation of Ferric Sulfate, Electrosurgical and Diode Laser on human primary molars pulpotomy: an "in-vivo" study. , 2014, Laser therapy.

[13]  M. Talebi,et al.  Sodium hypochlorite vs formocresol as pulpotomy medicaments in primary molars: 1-year follow-up. , 2013, Pediatric dentistry.

[14]  Aly Ma,et al.  Sodium hypochlorite versus Formocresol in primary molars pulpotomies: a randomized clinical trial. , 2013 .

[15]  R. Anegundi,et al.  Clinical and radiographic evaluation of pulpotomies in primary molars with formocresol, glutaraldehyde and ferric sulphate. , 2013, Oral health and dental management.

[16]  S. Makhija,et al.  A randomized study of sodium hypochlorite versus formocresol pulpotomy in primary molar teeth. , 2013, International journal of paediatric dentistry.

[17]  P. D. De Coster,et al.  Laser-assisted pulpotomy in primary teeth: a systematic review. , 2012, International journal of paediatric dentistry.

[18]  M. Mercadè,et al.  Clinical and radiographic outcomes of the use of four dressing materials in pulpotomized primary molars: a randomized clinical trial with 2-year follow-up. , 2012, International journal of paediatric dentistry.

[19]  J. Boynton,et al.  Retrospective record review: reinforced zinc oxide-eugenol pulpotomy: a retrospective study. , 2013, Pediatric dentistry.

[20]  Chiniforush Nasim,et al.  Clinical Approach of Laser Application in Different Aspects of Pediatric Dentistry , 2012 .

[21]  R. Haghgoo,et al.  A Histopathological Comparison of Pulpotomy with Sodium Hypochlorite and Formocresol , 2012, Iranian endodontic journal.

[22]  R. Hickel,et al.  Long-term effectiveness of four pulpotomy techniques: 3-year randomised controlled trial , 2011, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[23]  M. Kanellis,et al.  Sodium hypochlorite pulpotomies in primary teeth: a retrospective assessment. , 2011, Pediatric dentistry.

[24]  N. Tadayon,et al.  Clinical and Radiographic Success of Low Level LaserTherapy (LLLT) on Primary Molars Pulpotomy , 2010 .

[25]  E. Barış,et al.  Clinical, radiographic, and histopathologic evaluation of Nd:YAG laser pulpotomy on human primary teeth. , 2007, Journal of endodontics.

[26]  K. Vargas,et al.  Preliminary evaluation of sodium hypochlorite for pulpotomies in primary molars. , 2006, Pediatric dentistry.

[27]  O. Günhan,et al.  The effect of sodium hypochlorite application on the success of calcium hydroxide pulpotomy in primary teeth. , 2006, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[28]  Jeng-fen Liu.  Effects of Nd:YAG laser pulpotomy on human primary molars. , 2006, Journal of endodontics.

[29]  H. Furze,et al.  Pulpotomy with Laser in Primary and Young Permanent Teeth , 2006 .

[30]  A. Crispin,et al.  Effectiveness of 4 Pulpotomy Techniques—Randomized Controlled Trial , 2005, Journal of dental research.

[31]  K. Titley,et al.  Assessment of a novel alternative to conventional formocresol-zinc oxide eugenol pulpotomy for the treatment of pulpally involved human primary teeth: diode laser-mineral trioxide aggregate pulpotomy. , 2005, International journal of paediatric dentistry.

[32]  G. Holan,et al.  Long-term evaluation of pulpotomy in primary molars using mineral trioxide aggregate or formocresol. , 2005, Pediatric dentistry.

[33]  C. Takahashi,et al.  Formocresol mutagenicity following primary tooth pulp therapy: an in vivo study. , 2003, Journal of dentistry.

[34]  J. Dean,et al.  Comparison of electrosurgical and formocresol pulpotomy procedures in children. , 2002, International journal of paediatric dentistry.

[35]  Seale Ns,et al.  Ferric sulfate pulpotomy in primary molars: a retrospective study. , 2000 .

[36]  P. Cleaton-jones,et al.  Pulp response to ferric sulfate, diluted formocresol and IRM in pulpotomized primary baboon teeth. , 1997, ASDC journal of dentistry for children.

[37]  K. Matsumoto,et al.  The effect of pulpotomy using CO2 and Nd:YAG lasers on dental pulp tissue. , 1997, International endodontic journal.

[38]  S. Fadavi,et al.  A comparison of the pulpal response to freeze-dried bone, calcium hydroxide, and zinc oxide-eugenol in primary teeth in two cynomolgus monkeys. , 1996, Pediatric dentistry.

[39]  D. Ranly.  Pulpotomy therapy in primary teeth: new modalities for old rationales. , 1994, Pediatric dentistry.

[40]  R. Kreiger,et al.  Formaldehyde-induced cytotoxicity and sister-chromatid exchanges in human lymphocyte cultures. , 1983, Mutation research.

[41]  B B Lewis,et al.  Formaldehyde in dentistry: a review of mutagenic and carcinogenic potential. , 1981, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[42]  R. J. Pruhs,et al.  Relationship between formocresol pulpotomies on primary teeth and enamel defects on their permanent successors. , 1977, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[43]  C. A. Sweet.  Procedure for Treatment of Exposed and Pulpless Deciduous Teeth , 1930 .