An extension on super slacks-based measure DEA approach

In order to break the tie of efficient decision-making units, super-efficiency data envelopment analysis is proposed to fully discriminate them. Recently, a slacks-based version of the super slacks-based measure (S-SBM) is developed and a novel two-stage approach is proposed to calculate both super-efficiency score by the S-SBM model and efficiency score by the slacks-based measure model. In this paper, we extend the approach to consider continuity of efficiency scores. We illustrate the discontinuity of efficiency measure, and define a continuous slacks-based measure which is proved continuous and directly calculated. An interesting efficiency zone category is also provided. In addition, this paper investigates the relationship among the super-efficiency measures of the proposed approach and some existing approaches under variable returns to scale.

[1]  Patrick T. Harker,et al.  Note: Ranking DMUs with Infeasible Super-Efficiency DEA Models , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[2]  Stefan Scholtes,et al.  Continuity of DEA Efficiency Measures , 2003, Oper. Res..

[3]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Cone ratio data envelopment analysis and multi-objective programming , 1989 .

[4]  Joe Zhu Robustness of the efficient DMUs in data envelopment analysis , 1996 .

[5]  Paul W. Wilson,et al.  Detecting influential observations in data envelopment analysis , 1995 .

[6]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Programming with linear fractional functionals , 1962 .

[7]  Jesús T. Pastor,et al.  An enhanced DEA Russell graph efficiency measure , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[8]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[9]  P. Andersen,et al.  A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis , 1993 .

[10]  Jin-Xiao Chen,et al.  A modified super-efficiency measure based on simultaneous input-output projection in data envelopment analysis , 2011, Comput. Oper. Res..

[11]  Hsuan-Shih Lee,et al.  A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis: An alternative approach , 2013 .

[12]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[13]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Super-efficiency DEA in the presence of infeasibility , 2011, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  Yao Chen,et al.  Measuring super-efficiency in DEA in the presence of infeasibility , 2005, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[15]  Chien-Ming Chen,et al.  Super efficiencies or super inefficiencies? Insights from a joint computation model for slacks-based measures in DEA , 2013, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[16]  A. Charnes,et al.  A structure for classifying and characterizing efficiency and inefficiency in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1991 .

[17]  C. A. Knox Lovell,et al.  Equivalent standard DEA models to provide super-efficiency scores , 2003, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[18]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of DEA models for simultaneous changes in all the data , 1998, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[19]  Joe Zhu,et al.  A modified super-efficiency DEA model for infeasibility , 2009, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[20]  R. Robert Russell,et al.  Duality and continuity , 1995 .

[21]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  INFEASIBILITY OF SUPER EFFICIENCY DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS MODELS , 1999 .

[22]  R. Robert Russell,et al.  Continuity of measures of technical efficiency , 1990 .

[23]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Stability of efficiency evaluations in data envelopment analysis , 1989, ZOR Methods Model. Oper. Res..

[24]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  Analysis of Cost Variances for Management Control in Hospitals , 1990 .

[25]  A. Charnes,et al.  SENSITIVITY OF EFFICIENCY CLASSIFICATIONS IN THE ADDITIVE MODEL OF DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS , 1992 .

[26]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  Stability regions for maintaining efficiency in data envelopment analysis , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[27]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Super-efficiency and DEA sensitivity analysis , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[28]  Liang Liang,et al.  Super-efficiency DEA in the presence of infeasibility: One model approach , 2011, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[29]  Yao Chen,et al.  Ranking efficient units in DEA , 2004 .

[30]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .