Efficient Unstructured Grid Adaptation Methods for Sonic Boom Prediction

This paper examines the use of two grid adaptation methods to improve the accuracy of the near-to-mid field pressure signature prediction of supersonic aircraft computed using the USM3D unstructured grid flow solver. The first method (ADV) is an interactive adaptation process that uses grid movement rather than enrichment to more accurately resolve the expansion and compression waves. The second method (SSGRID) uses an a priori adaptation approach to stretch and shear the original unstructured grid to align the grid with the pressure waves and reduce the cell count required to achieve an accurate signature prediction at a given distance from the vehicle. Both methods initially create negative volume cells that are repaired in a module in the ADV code. While both approaches provide significant improvements in the near field signature (< 3 body lengths) relative to a baseline grid without increasing the number of grid points, only the SSGRID approach allows the details of the signature to be accurately computed at mid-field distances (3-10 body lengths) for direct use with mid-field-to-ground boom propagation codes.

[1]  Richard L. Campbell,et al.  Unstructured CFD and Noise Prediction Methods for Propulsion Airframe Aeroacoustics , 2006 .

[2]  Donald C. Howe,et al.  Quiet Spike Near Field Flight Test Pressure Measurements with CFD Comparisons , 2008 .

[3]  Peter G. Coen,et al.  Origins and Overview of the Shaped Sonic Boom Demonstration Program , 2005 .

[4]  Osama A. Kandil,et al.  Fun3D / OptiGRID Coupling for Unstructured Grid Adaptation for Sonic Boom Problems , 2008 .

[5]  David L. Darmofal,et al.  Output-Adaptive Tetrahedral Cut-Cell Validation for Sonic Boom Prediction , 2008 .

[6]  N. Frink Assessment of an Unstructured-Grid Method for Predicting 3-D Turbulent Viscous Flows , 1996 .

[7]  Paresh Parikh,et al.  The NASA tetrahedral unstructured software system (TetrUSS) , 2000, The Aeronautical Journal (1968).

[8]  Phil Scott Lowering the boom. Quieter ways to break the sound barrier. , 2003, Scientific American.

[9]  J. P. Mendoza,et al.  Further studies of the extrapolation of near field overpressure data , 1971 .

[10]  J. Page,et al.  Extrapolation of sonic boom signatures from CFD solutions , 2002 .

[11]  Eric J. Nielsen,et al.  Validation of 3D Adjoint Based Error Estimation and Mesh Adaptation for Sonic Boom Prediction , 2006 .

[12]  R. M. Hicks,et al.  Single-Point and Multipoint Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of High-Speed Civil Transport , 2001 .

[13]  Shahyar Pirzadeh,et al.  Advanced Unstructured Grid Generation for Complex Aerodynamics Applications , 2008 .

[14]  Shahyar Pirzadeh,et al.  Three-dimensional unstructured viscous grids by the advancing-layers method , 1996 .

[15]  P. Roe CHARACTERISTIC-BASED SCHEMES FOR THE EULER EQUATIONS , 1986 .

[16]  Kelly R. Laflin,et al.  A Hybrid Computational Fluid Dynamics Procedure for Sonic Boom Prediction , 2006 .

[17]  P. Spalart A One-Equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic Flows , 1992 .

[18]  Robert P. Narducci,et al.  Drag prediction using nonlinear computational methods , 2000 .

[19]  F. Menter Improved two-equation k-omega turbulence models for aerodynamic flows , 1992 .

[20]  Kenrick Waithe,et al.  Application of USM3D for Sonic Boom Prediction by Utilizing a Hybrid Procedure , 2008 .