A hydrogeomorphic river network model predicts where and why hyporheic exchange is important in large basins

Hyporheic exchange has been hypothesized to have basin-scale consequences; however, predictions throughout river networks are limited by available geomorphic and hydrogeologic data and by models that can analyze and aggregate hyporheic exchange flows across large spatial scales. We developed a parsimonious but physically based model of hyporheic flow for application in large river basins: Networks with EXchange and Subsurface Storage (NEXSS). We applied NEXSS across a broad range of geomorphic diversity in river reaches and synthetic river networks. NEXSS demonstrates that vertical exchange beneath submerged bed forms rather than lateral exchange through meanders dominates hyporheic fluxes and turnover rates along river corridors. Per kilometer, low-order streams have a biogeochemical potential at least 2 orders of magnitude larger than higher-order streams. However, when biogeochemical potential is examined per average length of each stream order, low- and high-order streams were often found to be comparable. As a result, the hyporheic zone's intrinsic potential for biogeochemical transformations is comparable across different stream orders, but the greater river miles and larger total streambed area of lower order streams result in the highest cumulative impact from low-order streams. Lateral exchange through meander banks may be important in some cases but generally only in large rivers.

[1]  Klaus Butterbach-Bahl,et al.  Modeling denitrification in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems at regional scales. , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[2]  Mary A. Voytek,et al.  Hyporheic zone denitrification: Controls on effective reaction depth and contribution to whole‐stream mass balance , 2013 .

[3]  G. Parker,et al.  Physical Basis for Quasi-Universal Relationships Describing Bankfull Hydraulic Geometry of Sand-Bed Rivers , 2011 .

[4]  S. Hamilton,et al.  Factors affecting ammonium uptake in streams – an inter‐biome perspective , 2003 .

[5]  R. Naiman,et al.  Nitrate removal in the hyporheic zone of a salmon river in Alaska , 2009 .

[6]  Brendan G. McKie,et al.  Continental-Scale Effects of Nutrient Pollution on Stream Ecosystem Functioning , 2012, Science.

[7]  Elizabeth W. Boyer,et al.  Nitrogen retention in rivers: model development and application to watersheds in the northeastern U.S.A. , 2002 .

[8]  S. Hamilton,et al.  Control of Nitrogen Export from Watersheds by Headwater Streams , 2001, Science.

[9]  M. Doyle,et al.  Nutrient spiraling in streams and river networks , 2006 .

[10]  R. Haggerty,et al.  Dynamics of nitrate production and removal as a function of residence time in the hyporheic zone , 2011 .

[11]  Y. Fan,et al.  Global Patterns of Groundwater Table Depth , 2013, Science.

[12]  Michelle A Baker,et al.  Are rivers just big streams? A pulse method to quantify nitrogen demand in a large river. , 2008, Ecology.

[13]  Jesús Carrera,et al.  Multicomponent reactive transport in multicontinuum media , 2009 .

[14]  Mary A. Voytek,et al.  Multi-scale measurements and modeling of denitrification in streams with varying flow and nitrate concentration in the upper Mississippi River basin, USA , 2009 .

[15]  J. Harvey,et al.  Interactions between hyporheic flow produced by stream meanders, bars, and dunes , 2013 .

[16]  M. Bayani Cardenas,et al.  Lateral hyporheic exchange throughout the Mississippi River network , 2014 .

[17]  B. O’Connor,et al.  Scaling hyporheic exchange and its influence on biogeochemical reactions in aquatic ecosystems , 2008 .

[18]  G. Griffiths.  Downstream hydraulic geometry and hydraulic similitude , 2003 .

[19]  F. Engelund,et al.  Hydraulic Resistance of Alluvial Streams , 1966 .

[20]  P. Ciais,et al.  Global carbon dioxide emissions from inland waters , 2013, Nature.

[21]  William H. McDowell,et al.  Global abundance and size distribution of streams and rivers , 2012 .

[22]  L. V. Beek,et al.  Water balance of global aquifers revealed by groundwater footprint , 2012, Nature.

[23]  J. Wilson,et al.  Age distributions and dynamically changing hydrologic systems: Exploring topography‐driven flow , 2013 .

[24]  William H. McDowell,et al.  Stream denitrification across biomes and its response to anthropogenic nitrate loading , 2008, Nature.

[25]  Syunsuke Ikeda,et al.  Prediction of Alternate Bar Wavelength and Height , 1984 .

[26]  W. Dietrich,et al.  Physical basis for quasi-universal relations describing bankfull hydraulic geometry of single-thread gravel bed rivers , 2007 .

[27]  A. Elliott,et al.  Transfer of nonsorbing solutes to a streambed with bed forms: Theory , 1997 .

[28]  D. Tonina,et al.  The effects of discharge and slope on hyporheic flow in step‐pool morphologies , 2015 .

[29]  M. Cardenas,et al.  Residence time distributions in sinuosity‐driven hyporheic zones and their biogeochemical effects , 2012 .

[30]  Roberto Revelli,et al.  Hyporheic flow and transport processes: Mechanisms, models, and biogeochemical implications , 2014 .

[31]  L. Ridolfi,et al.  Quantifying the impact of groundwater discharge on the surface–subsurface exchange , 2009 .

[32]  Gregory E Schwarz,et al.  The Role of Headwater Streams in Downstream Water Quality1 , 2007, Journal of the American Water Resources Association.

[33]  C. Vörösmarty,et al.  Responses of Continental Aquatic Systems at the Global Scale: New Paradigms, New Methods , 2004 .

[34]  Wilfred M. Wollheim,et al.  Relationship between river size and nutrient removal , 2006 .

[35]  A. Bouwman,et al.  Exploring changes in river nitrogen export to the world's oceans , 2005 .

[36]  Lars Marklund,et al.  Fractal topography and subsurface water flows from fluvial bedforms to the continental shield , 2007 .

[37]  M. Cardenas.  Stream‐aquifer interactions and hyporheic exchange in gaining and losing sinuous streams , 2009 .

[38]  I. Webster,et al.  Solute Uptake in Aquatic Sediments due to Current-Obstacle Interactions , 1998 .

[39]  S. Hamilton,et al.  Thinking Outside the Channel: Modeling Nitrogen Cycling in Networked River Ecosystems , 2011 .

[40]  T. C. Winter,et al.  Ground Water and Surface Water: A Single Resource , 1999 .

[41]  C. Hopkinson,et al.  Surface and hyporheic transient storage dynamics throughout a coastal stream network , 2010 .

[42]  Gregory E. Schwarz,et al.  Effect of stream channel size on the delivery of nitrogen to the Gulf of Mexico , 2000, Nature.

[43]  M. Jaeggi.  Formation and Effects of Alternate Bars , 1984 .

[44]  J. Harvey,et al.  Effect of enhanced manganese oxidation in the hyporheic zone on basin‐scale geochemical mass balance , 1998 .

[45]  W. McDowell,et al.  Scaling the gas transfer velocity and hydraulic geometry in streams and small rivers , 2012 .