Harvest Choice and Timber Supply Models for Forest Forecasting

Timber supply has traditionally been modeled using aggregate data, whereas individual harvest choices have been shown to be sensitive to the vintage and condition of forest capital stocks. In this article, we build aggregate supply models for four roundwood products in a seven-state region of the US South directly from stand-level harvest choice models applied to detailed forest inventories. These models allow for a more precise accounting of the biological and economic underpinnings of supply and support forecasting of changes in forest inventories with a high degree of detail. Estimation results support use of the approach. The elasticities of softwood and hardwood sawtimber supply, 0.34 and 0.31, respectively, are consistent with the elasticities reported by previous studies. The elasticities of softwood and hardwood pulpwood supply (respectively, 0.062 and 0.025) are much lower than previous studies found for pulpwood supply, and cross-price elasticities indicate a dominant influence of sawtimber markets on pulpwood supply. Results generally indicate complementarity between sawtimber and pulpwood supply in the short run. This approach can provide a means of predicting the supply consequences of exogenous factors that could alter forest inventories, e.g., climate change and invasive species, and support regular updating of supply models as new inventory data are recorded. FOR .S CI. 56(4):344-355.

[1]  J. Turner,et al.  The Global Forest Products Model ( GFPM ) : Structure , Estimation , Applications , 2008 .

[2]  V. Ovaskainen,et al.  Forest taxation, timber supply, and economic efficiency. , 1992 .

[3]  J. Uusivuori,et al.  The Harvesting Decisions When a Standing Forest with Multiple Age‐Classes Has Value , 2005 .

[4]  J. Kuuluvainen,et al.  Timber Supply and Life Cycle Harvest of Nonindustrial Private Forest Owners: An Empirical Analysis of the Finnish Case , 1991, Forest Science.

[5]  Richard W. Haynes,et al.  The 1980 softwood timber assessment market model: structure, projections and policy simulations. , 1980 .

[6]  Subhrendu K. Pattanayak,et al.  How Joint is Joint Forest Production? An Econometric Analysis of Timber Supply Conditional on Endogenous Amenity Values , 2002, Forest Science.

[7]  Sharon W. Woudenberg,et al.  The Forest Inventory and Analysis Database: Database Description and Users Manual Version 4.0 for Phase 2 , 2012 .

[8]  John E. Kutzbach,et al.  Projected distributions of novel and disappearing climates by 2100 AD , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  John R. Hauser,et al.  Testing the Accuracy, Usefulness, and Significance of Probabilistic Choice Models: An Information-Theoretic Approach , 1978, Oper. Res..

[10]  S. Swallow,et al.  Spatial Interactions in Multiple-Use Forestry and Substitution and Wealth Effects for the Single Stand , 1993 .

[11]  B. Solberg,et al.  A panel data analysis of nonindustrial private roundwood supply with emphasis on the price elasticity , 2003 .

[12]  Carol L. Alerich,et al.  The forest inventory and analysis database description and users manual version 1.0 , 2001 .

[13]  D. R. Carter Effects of supply and demand determinants on pulpword stumpage quantity and price in Texas , 1992 .

[14]  D. Newman,et al.  An Econometric Analysis of the Southern Softwood Stumpage Market: 1950-1980 , 1987 .

[15]  Xiaoping Zhou,et al.  Incorporating interstate trade in a multi-region timber inventory projection system , 2006 .

[16]  David N. Wear,et al.  THE ECONOMICS OF TIMBER SUPPLY: AN ANALYTICAL SYNTHESIS OF MODELING APPROACHES , 1994 .

[17]  David N. Wear,et al.  Policy-Relevant Nonconvexities in the Production of Multiple Forest Benefits? , 1990 .

[18]  B. Provencher Structural Versus Reduced‐Form Estimation of Optimal Stopping Problems , 1997 .

[19]  Martin Moser,et al.  A timber harvesting model for Austria , 2000 .

[20]  David N. Wear,et al.  Land-Use Changes in Southern Appalachian Landscapes: Spatial Analysis and Forecast Evaluation , 1998, Ecosystems.

[21]  David N. Wear,et al.  Production Economics of Private Forestry: A Comparison of Industrial and Nonindustrial Forest Owners , 1993 .

[22]  Maksym Polyakov,et al.  Econometric analysis of Alabama's pulpwood market , 2005 .

[23]  R. Sheffield,et al.  North Carolina's forests , 1979 .

[24]  J. Kuuluvainen,et al.  Landowner Objectives and Nonindustrial Private Timber Supply , 1996, Forest Science.

[25]  Modeling Discrete Choice with Uncertain Data: An Augmented Mnl Estimator , 2004 .

[26]  Jeffrey P. Prestemon,et al.  Linking harvest choices to timber supply , 2000 .

[27]  Dale e. Lehman,et al.  A behavioral model of timber supply , 1988 .