Recruitment of heterosexual couples in public health research: a study protocol

BackgroundPublic health research involving social or kin groups (such as sexual partners or family members), rather than samples of unrelated individuals, has become more widespread in response to social ecological approaches to disease treatment and prevention. This approach requires the development of innovative sampling, recruitment and screening methodologies tailored to the study of related individuals.MethodsIn this paper, we describe a set of sampling, recruitment and screening protocols developed to enlist urban, drug-using, heterosexual couples into a public health research study. This population is especially hard to reach because they are engaged in illegal and/or stigmatized behaviors. The protocols were designed to integrate adaptive sampling, street- and referral-based recruitment, and screening procedures to verify study eligibility and relationship status.DiscussionRecruitment of heterosexual couples through one partner, preferably the female, can be an effective enlistment technique. Verification of relationship status is an important component of dyadic research. Comparison of parallel questionnaires administered to each member of a dyad can aid in the assessment of relationship status. However, multiple independent sources of information should be used to verify relationship status when available. Adaptive sampling techniques were effective in reaching drug-using heterosexual couples in an urban setting, and the application of these methods to other groups of related individuals in clinical and public health research may prove to be useful. However, care must be taken to consider potential sources of sampling bias when interpreting and generalizing study results.

[1]  Braun Ms Sampling a hidden population: noninstitutionalized drug users. , 1993 .

[2]  S. Tortu,et al.  Women's Drug Injection Practices in East Harlem: An Event Analysis in a High-Risk Community , 2003, AIDS and Behavior.

[3]  S. Tortu,et al.  Agreement between urinalysis and self-reported drug use. , 1999, Substance use & misuse.

[4]  P. Biernacki,et al.  TARGETED SAMPLING: OPTIONS FOR THE STUDY OF HIDDEN POPULATIONS , 1989 .

[5]  P. Rousseeuw,et al.  Unmasking Multivariate Outliers and Leverage Points , 1990 .

[6]  T. Wilson,et al.  Domestic Violence Reported by Women Attending a Sexually Transmitted Disease Clinic , 2001, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[7]  M. S. Braunstein Sampling a hidden population: noninstitutionalized drug users. , 1993, AIDS education and prevention : official publication of the International Society for AIDS Education.

[8]  S. Tortu,et al.  HEPATITIS C AMONG NONINJECTING DRUG USERS: A REPORT , 2001, Substance use & misuse.

[9]  M. Sinclair,et al.  Methods used to maintain a high level of participant involvement in a clinical trial , 2001, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[10]  Douglas D. Heckathorn,et al.  Respondent-driven sampling : A new approach to the study of hidden populations , 1997 .

[11]  Linda M Collins,et al.  Adaptive sampling in research on risk-related behaviors. , 2002, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[12]  Jennifer Lauby,et al.  Street and network sampling in evaluation studies of HIV risk-reduction interventions. , 2002, AIDS reviews.

[13]  D. Heckathorn,et al.  Extensions of Respondent-Driven Sampling: A New Approach to the Study of Injection Drug Users Aged 18–25 , 2002, AIDS and Behavior.

[14]  S. Gortmaker,et al.  Relationship power, condom use and HIV risk among women in the USA , 2002, AIDS care.

[15]  M. Kelley,et al.  Couples- versus individual-based therapy for alcohol and drug abuse: effects on children's psychosocial functioning. , 2002, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[16]  S. Tortu,et al.  Drug-Using Women's Sexual Risk: An Event Analysis , 2000, AIDS and Behavior.